ABSTRACT
Objective To conduct reevaluation of systematic review/Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arteri-al chemoembolization(TACE)combined with sorafenib in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Methods The systematic reviews and Meta-analysis of TACE combined with sorafenib in the treatment of HCC were collected through computer searches on PubMed,Embase,the CochraneLibrary,CNKI and Wanfang data knowledge service platform.The time limit was from data-base inception to August 2022.The experimental group received TACE combined with sorafenib,and the control group received other con-ventional treatments.After screening the literature and extracting the data,PRISMA statement was adopted to evaluate the quality of the included reports,AMSTAR 2scale was used for methodological quality evaluation,and GRADE tool was used for outcome indicator and evidence quality evaluation.Results A total of 9 literatures were included,including 43 outcome indicators.The PRISMA score was 20.5-25.5,including 7 articles of high quality and 2 articles of moderate quality.The results of AMSTAR 2 quality evaluation show that all the literatures were of extremely low quality,and the key items with the most problems were item 2 and item 7.The results of GRADE evaluation showed that there were 4 high quality indicators,15medium quality indicators,21 low quality indicators and 3 unevaluable indi-cators.The main factor leading to degradation was bias risk,followed by inconsistency.In terms of curative effect,compared with the con-trol group,the 1-year survival rate,time to progression,objective response rate and disease control rate of patients in the experimental group were significantly improved.However,the incidence of adverse reactions(diarrhea,hand and foot syndrome,hypertension)in the control group was significantly better than those in the experimental group.Conclusion The methodology quality and evidence quality of systematic review/Meta-analysis related to TACE combined with sorafenib in the treatment of HCC is poor,and the standardization still needs to be further improved.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE To reevaluate the system atic evaluation of g emcitabine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC），in order to provide evidence-based evidence for the treatment of NSCLC. METHODS Retrieved from Wanfang database ，CNKI，VIP，PubMed，Embase，systematic evaluation of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the treatment of advanced NSCLC was included from the inception to Dec. 2021. RevMan 5.3 system evaluation software was used for meta-analysis of various outcome indicators ； AMSTAR2 scale was used for methodological quality evaluation ，and GRADE tool was used for evidence quality evaluation. RESULTS A total of 9 literatures were included. Meta-analysis showed that the effective rate of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin was significantly lower than pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but was similar to vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The 1-year survival rate of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin was equivalent to that of pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but was superior to vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting between gemcitabine combined with cisplatin and pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin had a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia than pemetrexed/vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in gemcitabine combined with cisplatin were higher than pemetrexed combined with cisplatin ，but were significantly lower than vinorelbine combined with cisplatin. The evaluation results of AMSTAR 2 scale showed that 6 systematic evaluation were of low quality in methodology and 3 were of very low quality. The results of the GRADE tool showed that 31％ of the outcome indicators were of medium quality （14 items），27％ were of low quality （12 items），and 42％ were of very low quality（19 items）. Research limitations and publication bias were the most frequently downgraded factors. CONCLUSIONS Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin has advantages over 154854280@qq.com vinorelbine combined with cisplatin in the efficacy and safety of ad vanced NSCLC ，especially in the 1-year survival rate ，the incidence of neutropenia and leucopenia. The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin are inferior to those of pemetrexed combined with cisplatin. However ，the methodological quality and evidence level of systematic evaluation are not high on the whole ，and the overall quality of research needs to be improved.