ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of the optical surface imaging system (OSI) using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) algorithm in single-center non-coplanar treatment of multiple brain metastases.Methods:Data of phantom and 15 patients with multiple brain metastases who underwent single-center non-coplanar radiotherapy in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. kV/MV and OSI imaging were used for imaging of the patients and phantoms under the same non-coplanar couch angle, respectively. The accuracy of OSI imaging of the phantoms and patients was evaluated using kV/MV imaging as reference image. The difference between the OSI and kV/MV systems is defined as accuracy, and the percentage of the absolute difference ≤1.00 mm in the translational direction or ≤0.50° in the rotational direction is defined as the threshold pass rate. Origin software was used to draw radar maps and Bland-Altman plots for statistical analysis.Results:When OSI images were used for the phantom imaging, the average differences in six-dimensional directions of lateral, long, vertical, rotational, roll and pitch were 0.03 mm, -0.09 mm, -0.27 mm, 0.04°, 0.17° and -0.19°, respectively. The maximum values were -2.20 mm, -2.30 mm, -1.20 mm, 0.60°, -1.00°, and -1.00°, respectively. When OSI system was utilized for the imaging of 15 patients, the average differences in six-dimensional directions were 0.44 mm, 0.16 mm, -0.20 mm, -0.11°, 0.10°, and -0.12°, respectively. The maximum values were -1.80 mm, 2.00 mm, 0.90 mm, -0.90°, -0.70°, and 0.80°, respectively. The translational errors mainly occurred in the lateral and long directions. The qualified rates of the threshold values of the phantoms and patients were 77% and 75% in the lateral direction, 82% and 89% in the long direction, respectively. In addition, 57% and 56% of patients met the threshold conditions of ±1.00 mm and ±0.50° in the six-dimensional directions, respectively.Conclusions:The OSI system using new SRS algorithm cannot meet the high accuracy requirements of single-center non-coplanar radiotherapy for multiple brain metastasis, especially in the lateral and long directions. It is not recommended for non-coplanar image guidance.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of Zap-X system and CyberKnife (CK) G4 system of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single brain metastasis.Methods:Twelve patients with single brain metastasis had been treated with CK were selected retrospectively. The prescribed dose of planning target volume (PTV) was 18-24 Gy for 1-3 fractions. The PTV was ranged from 0.44 to 11.52 cm 3. The 12 patients were re-planned in the Zap-X planning system using the same prescription dose and organs at risk constraints, and the prescription dose of PTV was normalized to 70% for both Zap-X and CK. The planning parameters and dosimetric parameters of PTV and organs at risk were compared and evaluated between two plans. All data were read at MIM Maestro. A paired Wilcoxon' signed-rank test was adopted for statistical analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistical significance. Results:For the target coverage, CK was significantly higher than Zap-X (99.14±0.57% vs. 97.55±1.34%, P<0.01), but Zap-X showed a higher conformity index (0.81±0.05 vs. 0.77±0.07, P<0.05), a lower Paddick gradient index (2.98±0.24 vs. 3.15±0.38), and a higher gradient score index (GSI) than CK. The total monitor unit (MU) of Zap-X was significantly lower than that of CK (11 627.63 ±5 039.53 vs. 23 522.16 ±4 542.12, P<0.01) and the treatment time was shorter than that of CK [(25.08 ±6.52) vs. (38.08 ±4.74) min, P<0.01]. Zap-X had lower dose volumes than CK for the dose of brain ( P<0.05). Zap-X had a lower D mean and D max of brainstem (both P<0.05), but a higher value of eyes and lens. For optic nerves and optic chiasm, there were no significant differences between two groups. In addition, for the protection of skin (V 22.5 Gy), Zap-X seemed better than CK [(4.15±4.48) vs. (4.37±4.50) cm 3, P<0.05]. Conclusions:For SRS treating single brain metastasis, Zap-X could provide a high quality plan equivalent to or even better than CK, especially reducing the treatment time. With continuous improvement and upgrading of Zap-X system, it may become a new SRS platform for the treatment of brain metastasis.
ABSTRACT
Surgery combined with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can improve the overall survival and becomes one of main treatments for resectable brain metastases. Compared with postoperative SRS, preoperative SRS (Pre-SRS) has theoretical advantages of reducing the dissemination of active tumor cells into the treatment cavity during surgery, reducing radiation dose, reducing radiation to surrounding normal brain tissue, and ensuring successful implementation of perioperative treatment, etc. Recent clinical studies have confirmed that Pre-SRS can reduce local recurrence rate and the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN) and leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM). Moreover, the indications, dose fractionation, and combined therapy remain to be confirmed by more prospective studies. In this article, research progress in Pre-SRS for resectable brain metastases was reviewed.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the accuracy and stability of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) algorithm in optical surface imaging (OSI) system in non-coplanar radiotherapy.Methods:Three OSI imaging systems were used to measure the phantom repeatedly at different couch rotation angles to analyze the accuracy and stability of OSI system. Seven patients with multiple brain metastases who underwent single-center non-coplanar radiotherapy were randomly selected, and the accuracy and stability of OSI for patient imaging were analyzed. Stability is defined as the difference between the two OSI measurements when the couch is turned from 0° to a non 0° angle, and then back to 0°, using the 0° cone beam CT (CBCT) as the "gold standard". Accuracy is defined as the difference between OSI and CBCT (at 0° couch angle) measurement data. The measurement data with normal distribution were described as Mean ± SD. The data with non-normal distribution were expressed as M (Q). The difference of the former data was compared by one-way ANOVA, and the difference of the latter data was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis H nonparametric test. Results:For non-coplanarity, the translation accuracy of the phantom and the patient was ≤ 1.30 mm and ≤ 1.00 mm, and the rotation accuracy was ≤ 0.50° and ≤ 0.60°, respectively. The translation errors mainly occurred in the left-right and head-foot directions. In terms of stability, the maximum standard deviation of phantom coplanar translation and rotation was 0.06 mm and 0.06°. The maximum standard deviation of patient translation and rotation was 0.17 mm and 0.19°.Conclusions:Although the new SRS algorithm improves the non-coplanar accuracy, it still cannot meet the precise requirements of non-coplanar single isocenter radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases, especially in the left-right and head-foot directions. When the couch rotation angle is large, OSI is not recommended for image-guided radiotherapy. However, its high stability can be used to monitor the intrafractional motion of patients.
ABSTRACT
Jugular foramen schwannomas (JFS) are rare benign tumors located in the jugular foramen. They can present with various symptoms depending on the extent of involvement of the tumor such as hearing loss, tinnitus, headache, and ataxia. Surgical resection has been considered as the primary treatment option for JFS. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) offers an equally good treatment in patients with small and residual tumors after surgery with the advantage of being non-invasive with minimal complication rates. Herein, we present a rare case of JFS treated by SRS in our institution.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy and side effects of multi-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases from colorectal cancer.Methods:A total of 98 patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer searched from the database of Professional Committee of Brain Metastasis of Shanghai Anticancer Association were recruited in this study. Among them, 46 patients weretreated with SRT and 52 patients with SRS. Clinical characteristics of all patients were analyzed between two groups and the local tumor control rate, median survival time and the incidence of radiation-induced brain injury were compared between two groups.Results:The objective remission rates (ORR) in the SRT and SRS groups were 76.1% and 67.3%, respectively. The 12-month local tumor control rates were 88.3% and 83.9% between two groups, with no statistical difference ( P=0.689). The median overall survival time of all patients was 11.6 months, 10.8 months in the SRT group and 12.7 months in the SRS group. There was no statistical difference between two groups ( P=0.129). Multivariate analysis showed that the main factors leading to poor prognosis included the number of tumors of >3( P=0.026), low GPA score ( P=0.035), and lack of systematic treatment mode and bevacizumab ( P=0.001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of acute and late radiation-induced brain injury between two groups. Conclusions:Both SRT and SRS are effective therapies for brain metastases from colorectal cancer. The synergistic application of systematic treatment mode may be one of the main reasons affecting the survival time of the patients.
ABSTRACT
Lung cancer is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence and mortality in China, and is prone to brain metastasis in the process of disease development, which seriously affects the quality of life and survival of patients. The treatment methods for brain metastasis of lung cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy, etc. It's one of the research hotspots to choose reasonable and effective treatment schemes for different patients. This paper reviews the research progress in the treatment of brain metastasis from lung cancer, to provide reference for selecting more reasonable clinical treatment for the patients.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are two treatment modalities commonly utilized to treat brain metastases (BMs). Aim: The purpose of this study is to analyse retrospectively the local control and survival of patients with BMs of breast cancer (BC) treated via radiosurgery using Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT-RS). Methods: 18 patients with 41 BMs of BC and treated by VMAT-RS were studied. They were classified according to the molecular subtype of BC and the modified breast graded prognostic assessment -GPA- index. Patients presented 1-4 BMs, which were treated with 5 non-coplanar VMAT arcs. The spatial distribution of BMs, the influence of receptor status on the location of the lesions and survival assessed via the Kaplan-Meier model were analyzed. Results: The median survival time (MST) was 19.7 months. Statistically significant differences were determined in the MST according to the Karnofsky performance status (p= 0.02) and the HER2 status (p= 0.004), being more prolonged in the HER2+ patients. Finally, our results showed that the cerebellum is the predominant site of breast cancer BMs, and also suggested that HER2+BMs had a predilection for some structures of the posterior circulation, such as the cerebellum, brainstem and occipital lobes (p= 0.048). Conclusions: The VMAT-RS is a technique with an overall survival comparable to other radiosurgery techniques. The baseline situation at the time of treatment, the modified breast-GPA and the molecular subtypes, are factors that significantly influence patient survival.
Resumen Antecedentes: La radioterapia holocraneal (WBRT) y la radiocirugía estereotáctica (SRS) son dos modalidades de tratamiento comúnmente empleados para el tratamiento de las metástasis cerebrales (BMs). Objetivo: El propósito de este estudio es analizar de forma retrospectiva el control local y la supervivencia de los pacientes con BMs de cáncer de mama (BC) tratados mediante radiocirugía empleando arcoterapia volumétrica modulada (VMAT-RS). Métodos: Se analizaron 18 pacientes con 41 BMs de BC tratados mediante VMAT-RS. Se clasificaron según el subtipo molecular de BC y el GPA (Graded Prognostic Assessment) modificado de cáncer de mama. Los pacientes presentaron de 1-4 BMs, las cuales fueron tratadas con 5 arcos VMAT no coplanares. Se analizó la distribución espacial de las BMs, la influencia del status del receptor en la localización de las lesiones y la supervivencia evaluada mediante el modelo de Kaplan-Meier. Resultados: La mediana del tiempo de supervivencia (MST) fue de 19.7 meses. Se hallaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el MST según el índice de Karnofsky (p= 0.02) y el status de HER2 (p= 0.004), siendo más prolongado en las pacientes HER2+. Por último, nuestros resultados mostraron que el cerebelo es el lugar predominante de las BMs de cáncer de mama, y también sugirieron que las BMs HER2+ presentaban una predilección por algunas estructuras de la circulación posterior, como el cerebelo, el tronco cerebral y los lóbulos occipitales (p= 0.048). Conclusiones: VMAT-RS es una técnica con una supervivencia global comparable a otras técnicas de radiocirugía. La situación basal en el momento del tratamiento, el GPA modificado de cáncer de mama así como los subtipos moleculares de cáncer de mama, son factores que influyen de forma significativa en la supervivencia de los pacientes.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases from January 2006 to December 2016, lung adenocarcinoma and analyze the related factors.@*Methods@#In this multi-center retrospective analysis, clinical data of 208 patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed and assigned into the SRT (n=86) and SRS groups (n=122). The clinical characteristics of patients in two groups were analyzed. The local tumor control rate, median survival time and radiation brain injury were statistically compared between two groups.@*Results@#At the end of follow-up, the objective response rates (ORR) were 70.9% and 71.3% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.772). The local tumor control rates at 12 months were 89% and 86% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.383). The median overall survival time of all patients was 14.3 months, 15.6 months in the SRT group and 13.7 months in the SRS group (P=0.349). Multivariate analysis showed that large target volume (P<0.001), low GPA score (P=0.012) and no insensitive gene mutation (P<0.001) were the main factors of poor prognosis. The incidence of late radiation brain injury was 5.8% and 14.8% in two groups (P=0.043).@*Conclusions@#SRT and SRS yield similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma. SRT may have a lower incidence of late radiation brain injury than SRS.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare relevant dosimetric parameters of non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treating brain tumors in conventional flattening filter (FF) or flattening filter-free (FFF) delivery mode, aiming to explore the appropriate evaluation method of accelerator for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).@*Methods@#Clinical data of 10 patients with single cranial tumor were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received non-coplanar VMAT at a prescription dose of 25 Gy in 1 fraction. Dosimetric parameters including conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI50, GI25), gradient, volume of the brain tissue receiving larger than 10 Gy and 12 Gy(V10 and V12) and beam-on time were statistically compared between two treatment plans by paired sample t-test.@*Results@#When FFF-VMAT was compared with FF-VMAT in SRS for intracranial tumors, Paddick gradient index GI50 was 2.91±0.34 vs.3.07±0.35, 6.91±0.28 vs.7.35±0.27 for GI25, (0.57±0.07) cm vs.(0.61±0.08) cm for gradient, respectively (all P<0.05), whereas CI did not significantly differ (P>0.05). For the normal brain tissues, the average dose was (160.64±43.64) cGy vs.(174.27±53.98) cGy, (45.35±30.32)% vs.(48.37±30.88)% for V10 and (36.69±25.15)% vs.(39.48±25.37)% for V12, respectively (all P<0.05).@*Conclusions@#Non-coplanar VMAT in FFF delivery mode can improve dose distribution and normal brain tissue sparing in the treatment of intracranial single tumors. Meanwhile, supplement of GI index and gradient index can implement comprehensive evaluation of the SRS planning.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare relevant dosimetric parameters of non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in treating brain tumors in conventional flattening filter (FF) or flattening filter-free (FFF) delivery mode,aiming to explore the appropriate evaluation method of accelerator for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).Methods Clinical data of 10 patients with single cranial tumor were retrospectively analyzed.All patients received non-coplanar VMAT at a prescription dose of 25 Gy in 1 fraction.Dosimetric parameters including conformity index (CI),heterogeneity index (HI),gradient index (GI50,GI25),gradient,volume of the brain tissue receiving larger than 10 Gy and 12 Gy (V10 and V12) and beam-on time were statistically compared between two treatment plans by paired sample t-test.Results When FFF-VMAT was compared with FF-VMAT in SRS for intracranial tumors,Paddick gradient index GI50 was 2.91±0.34 vs.3.07±0.35,6.91±0.28 vs.7.35±0.27 for GI25,(0.57±0.07) cm vs.(0.61±0.08) cm for gradient,respectively (all P<0.05),whereas CI did not significantly differ (P>0.05).For the normal brain tissues,the average dose was (160.64±43.64) cGy vs.(174.27± 53.98) cGy,(45.35± 30.32) % vs.(48.37± 30.88) % for V10 and (36.69±25.15) % vs.(39.48±25.37) % for V12,respectively (all P<0.05).Conclusions Non-coplanar VMAT in FFF delivery mode can improve dose distribution and normal brain tissue sparing in the treatment of intracranial single tumors.Meanwhile,supplement of GI index and gradient index can implement comprehensive evaluation of the SRS planning.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of brain metastases from January 2006 to December 2016,lung adenocarcinoma and analyze the related factors.Methods In this multi-center retrospective analysis,clinical data of 208 patients with brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed and assigned into the SRT (n=86) and SRS groups (n=122).The clinical characteristics of patients in two groups were analyzed.The local tumor control rate,median survival time and radiation brain injury were statistically compared between two groups.Results At the end of follow-up,the objective response rates (ORR) were 70.9% and 71.3% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.772).The local tumor control rates at 12 months were 89% and 86% in the SRT and SRS groups (P=0.383).The median overall survival time of all patients was 14.3 months,15.6 months in the SRT group and 13.7 months in the SRS group (P=0.349).Multivariate analysis showed that large target volume (P<0.001),low GPA score (P=0.012) and no insensitive gene mutation (P< 0.001) were the main factors of poor prognosis.The incidence of late radiation brain injury was 5.8% and 14.8% in two groups (P=0.043).Conclusions SRT and SRS yield similar clinical efficacy in the treatment of brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma.SRT may have a lower incidence of late radiation brain injury than SRS.
ABSTRACT
La radiocirugía estereotáctica ha demostrado efectividad en el tratamiento multimodal de los tumores de base de cráneo, de todas maneras se sugiere que en áreas radiobioló;gicamente sensibles (ej. nervios ó;pticos y tronco cerebral) la dosis radiante debería reducirse por los efectos radiotó;xicos. Para evitar la ineficacia terapó;©utica, una alternativa recientemente implementada es la radiocirugía multisesió;n (RCH). Se analizó; en forma retrospectiva una serie de tumores de base de cráneo, con el fin de evaluar el tratamiento con RCH a travó;©s del control tumoral en las imágenes post-tratamiento. Se evaluó; tambín edad, sexo, histología tumoral, volumen tumoral, protocolo radiante, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) pre-tratamiento y neurocirugía y tratamiento radiante previos. Fueron tratados 84 pacientes entre enero 2009 y enero 2017. La mediana de edad fue 51.5 aó;±os; sexo femenino: 53.6%. Hubo un 92.7% de no-progresió;n luego del tratamiento, con una mediana de tiempo de seguimiento de 36 meses. Los tumores tratados fueron principalmente adenomas hipofisarios, neurinomas del acó;ºstico, y meningiomas de base de cráneo. La mayoría de los pacientes recibió; un esquema de tratamiento fraccionado de 5 días, con una dosis total de 25 Gy. No se observó; radiotoxicidad tardía clínicamente manifiesta. En el análisis multivariado, un KPS alto pre-tratamiento fue significativamente asociado a la no-progresió;n tumoral. En esta serie, la alta incidencia de no-progresió;n tumoral indicaría que el tratamiento con RCH podría ser una opció;n terapó;©utica en algunos casos de tumores de base de cráneo, principalmente recurrencias o remanencias tumorales de adenomas hipofisarios, neurinomas y meningiomas.
Stereotactic radiosurgery has shown effectiveness in the multimodal treatment of skull base tumors, however it is suggested that in radiobiologically sensitive areas (eg. optic nerves and brainstem) the radiation dose should be reduced due to radiotoxic effects. To avoid the consequent therapeutic ineffectiveness, a recently implemented alternative is multisession radiosurgery (RCH). We retrospectively analyzed a series of patients with skull base tumors, in order to evaluate the treatment with RCH through tumor control in the post-treatment images. Age, sex, tumor histology, tumor volume, radiation protocol, pre-treatment Karnofsky performance status (KPS) previous neurosurgery and radiant treatment were also evaluated. Eighty-four patients were treated between January 2009 and January 2017. The median age was 51.5 years; females: 53.6%. There was a 92.7% non-progression after treatment, with a median follow-up time of 36 months. Treated tumors were mainly pituitary adenomas, acoustic schwannomas, and skull base meningiomas. Most of the patients received a 5-day fractionated treatment scheme, with a total dose of 25 Gy. No clinically manifest late radiotoxicity was observed. In the multivariate analysis, a high pre-treatment KPS was significantly associated with tumor non-progression. In our series, the high incidence of tumor non-progression would indicate that treatment with RCH could be a therapeutic option in some cases of skull-base tumors, mainly recurrences or tumor residuals of pituitary adenomas, neurinomas and meningiomas.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Radiosurgery/methods , Skull Base Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Time Factors , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Multivariate Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Karnofsky Performance Status , Disease-Free Survival , Disease Progression , Skull Base Neoplasms/pathology , Skull Base Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tumor Burden , Kaplan-Meier EstimateABSTRACT
Lung cancer ranks first in the incidence of malignancies in China.It not only has a high mortality rate,but also has a high rate of brain metastases because of its special texture characteristics.With the development of imaging techniques and the improvement of diagnosis and treatment,the overall survival rate of lung cancer patients with brain metastases has been increased,however,the 5-year survival rate at each stage is still about 18%.This article reviews the current effective treatment strategies,including surgery,radiotherapy,chemotherapy,and targeted therapies for brain metastases of lung cancer.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has become a major alternative in the neurosurgical field. However, many patients complained of considerable discomfort during the fixation of rigid headframe. This study investigated whether our modified procedure could reduce fixation-related pain. METHODS: Sixty-six patients who underwent GKRS were enrolled in this study. Thirty-one patients (Group A) underwent the conventional subcutaneous infiltration technique, and 35 patients (Group B) did the modified procedure. In group A, the headframe was held in position by an assistant, and local anesthetics were injected subcutaneously using a 23-gauge spinal needle at pinning sites. Subsequently, pins were applied according to measurements based on spinal needle depth. In group B, with the frame held in position by an assistant, pin sites were marked with a surgical pen under the guidance of needle cap placed on the pin holes. The head frame was then removed, and local anesthetics were injected subcutaneously and periosteally at each marked pin site using a 26-gauge needle. The headframe was then repositioned 5 minutes after local infiltration, and pins were applied according to measurements based on spinal needle depth. To evaluate pain severity during procedures, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded during local infiltration and frame placement with pins. The pain scores of the two groups were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Group B had a significantly lower VAS score during frame placement than group A (7.26 vs. 3.61; p<0.001), and mean VAS score at local infiltration was also significantly lower in group B (4.74 vs. 3.74; p=0.008). CONCLUSION: Patients in group B experienced significantly less pain than those in group A during pin placement. Pre-fixation time advanced local anesthesia might reduce pain during stereotactic procedures, and the use of a 26-gauge needle appeared in less pain during local infiltration.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Local , Anesthetics, Local , Head , Needles , RadiosurgeryABSTRACT
Este estudo objetiva avaliar o perfil sociodemográfico e clínico dos pacientes com metástase cerebral submetidos à radiocirurgia estereotáxica (RCE) no serviço de radioterapia de um hospital da região sul de Santa Catarina. Foram estudados dados de prontuários digitais de todos os pacientes submetidos à RCE como tratamento de metástase cerebral, de agosto de 2015 a agosto de 2016. Foram excluídos aqueles que realizaram RCE por outro motivo ou fora do período estudado. Dos 27 pacientes incluídos, 14 eram do sexo feminino e, 13, do masculino. O tumor primário mais encontrado foi o de pulmão (12 casos, 44,4%). A maioria dos pacientes apresentou uma lesão cerebral (16 casos, 59,3%), e a média de tamanho da lesão foi de 1,5 ± 0,86 cm. Em muitos pacientes a radiociurgia foi o único tratamento realizado para a metástase cerebral. Dos pacientes que haviam feito seguimento no hospital estudado (n = 14), nove apresentaram progressão da doença (64,3%), três obtiveram resposta parcial (21,4%) e dois permaneceram com doença estável (14,3%). A principal causa de progressão foi o aparecimento de novas lesões cerebrais (6 casos, 66,7%). A média de tamanho das lesões pósradiocirurgia foi de 1,28 ± 0,57 cm. A diferença do tamanho médio das lesões pré e pós-radiciurgia foi de 0,22 cm (p = 0,593). Grande parte dos resultados encontrados é condizente com os dados já encontrados na literatura. Sugere-se que novos estudos sejam realizados no serviço, principalmente para avaliar a resposta à RCE.
This study aims to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with cerebral metastases submitted to stereotatic radiosurgery (SRS) in the radiotherapy service of a hospital in the southern region of Santa Catarina. Data from digital files of all patients submitted to the SRS as treatment of cerebral metastases from August 2015 to August 2016 were studied. Those who performed SRS for another reason and out of the study period were excluded. From the 27 patients included, 14 were female and 13 were male. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (12 cases, 44.4%). Most of the patients had one brain lesion (16 cases, 59.3%), and the average lesion size was 1.5 ± 0.86 cm. In many patients, radiosurgery was the only treatment performed for brain metastases. From the patients who had been followed at the hospital studied (n = 14), nine had progression of the disease (64.3%), three had partial response (21.4%) and two remained with stable disease (14.3%). The main cause of progression was the appearance of new brain lesions (6 cases, 66.7%). The average size of lesions after radiosurgery was 1.28 ± 0.57 cm. The difference in average pre-and post-radiosurgery lesion size was 0.22 cm (p = 0.593). Most of the results found are consistent with data already available in the literature. It is suggested that the study be amplified, mainly to evaluate the response to the SRS.
ABSTRACT
Lung cancer is a malignant tumor,leading to the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide.Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancer types.Out of all the patients with advanced NSCLC,more than 40% develop brain metastasis,and lung cancer associated with brain metastasis indicates poor prognosis.Traditional treatment options,such as ra-diotherapy,chemotherapy and surgery,have an extremely limited role in improvement of prognosis of such patients.In recent years, with the development of stereotactic radiotherapy and targeted therapy,particularly chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, radiotherapy combined with targeted therapy and other types of therapies,NSCLC patients with brain metastases could benefit from these therapies with an improved quality of life and prolonged median overall survival. However, the ideal treatment regimen for NSCLC patients with brain metastases remains controversial.Recent advances in NSCLC with brain metastases will be described elabo-rately in this paper,to provide a theoretical basis for selecting a reasonable treatment plan for non-small lung cancer patients with brain metastasis.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of our optic nerve sheath meningioma (ONSM) case series in terms of preventing tumor growth and preserving vision in ONSM patients. METHODS: Between July 2003 and March 2015, 1,398 patients with intracranial meningioma were diagnosed at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Among them, only 13 patients (0.93%) were diagnosed with ONSM and enrolled in the present study. Tumor volume changes of ONSM patients and their visual acuity were evaluated before and after treatments. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 50 months (range, 12–133 months). Visual acuity was evaluated in 12 of 13 patients, and visual acuity was found to be preserved in 9 of 12 patients (75%). Tumor volume was reduced in all patients. The tumor control rate was 100% in the present study. The difference in tumor volume between pretreatment and last follow-up was statistically significant (p=0.015). CONCLUSION: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) could maintain visual acuity and stabilize tumor volume in ONSM patients, suggesting that IMRT and GKS may be effective therapies for ONSM. However, which treatment is the more effective modality must be confirmed by prospective studies and longer-term follow-up.
Subject(s)
Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Meningioma , Optic Nerve , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Seoul , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Burden , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
We present our experience on the hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery (FGKS) for large skull base meningioma as an initial treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients with large skull base meningioma ≥10 cm³ who underwent FGKS as the initial treatment option. The mean volume of tumors prior to radiosurgery was 21.2±15.63 cm³ (range, 10.09~71.42). The median total margin dose and marginal dose per fraction were 18 Gy (range, 15~20) and 6 Gy (range, 5~6), respectively. Patients underwent three or four fractionations in consecutive days with the same Leksell® frame. The mean follow-up duration was 38 months (range, 17~78). There was no mortality. At the last follow-up, the tumor volume was stationary in 15 patients (65.2%) and had decreased in 8 patients (34.8%). Six patients who had cranial neuropathy at the time of FGKS showed improvement at the last clinical follow-up. Following FGKS, 4 patients (17%) had new cranial neuropathy. The trigeminal neuropathy was the most common and all were transient. The mean Karnofsky Performance Status score at pre-FGKS and the last clinical follow-up was 97.0±10.4 points (median, 100) and 98.6±6.9 (median, 100) points, respectively. FGKS has showed satisfactory tumor control with functional preservation for large skull base meningiomas. Further prospective studies of large cohorts with long term follow-up are required to clarify the efficacy in the tumor control and functional outcome as well as radiation toxicity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Cohort Studies , Cranial Nerve Diseases , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Follow-Up Studies , Karnofsky Performance Status , Meningioma , Mortality , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery , Retrospective Studies , Skull Base , Skull , Trigeminal Nerve Diseases , Tumor BurdenABSTRACT
Objective To compare the dosimetric effects of micro-multileaf collimator (MLC)(2 mm leaf width) and conventional MLC (10 mm leaf width) on inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS). Methods In view of the fact that the micro-MLC has a small open field,30 patients with intracranial tumor with a<10 cm diameter were enrolled in this study. Their inverse dynamic IMRT plans were established using conventional MLC (conventional group) and micro-MLC (micro group) with the same other conditions. The radiation doses to the target volume and the organs at risk (OAR) were compared between the two groups with t test. Results Compared with the conventional group, the micro group had a significantly better dose distribution in the target volume (P=0.019). However, there were no significant differences in D98,D95,D50,and D3between the two groups (P=0.774,0.650,0.170,0.080). The micro group had a 58.7% lower mean homogeneity index and a 20.1% higher mean conformity index than the conventional group (P=0.000). The micro group had significantly lower radiation doses to OAR than the conventional group (P=0.044). The mean Dmeanand Dmaxof the brain stem in the micro group were 10.0% and 8.2%,respectively,lower than those in the conventional group (P=0.768,0.753). The mean Dmeanand Dmax of the right eye and left eye in the micro group were 16.5%,19.3%,21.4%,and 13.4%,respectively,lower than those in the conventional group (P=0.572,0.775 and 0.734,0.630). The mean Dmaxof the left lens, right lens, left optic nerve, right optic nerve, and optic chiasm in the micro group were 50.4%, 24.1%, 38.5%, 27.8%, and 5.7%, respectively, lower than those in the conventional group (P=0.172,0.467, 0.521,0.740,0.899). The PRV100,PRV50,and PRV25of the normal tissue in the micro group were no more than those in the conventional group(P=0.839,0.832,0.972). Conclusions In inverse IMRT in intracranial SRS,micro-MLC is better than conventional MLC because it can improve CI of the target volume and reduce the radiation doses to OAR.