Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide combined with Wells score helps predict acute pulmonary embolism / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective:To explore the clinical value of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO 2) combined with Wells score in predicting acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods:Patients with suspected acute PE admitted to Emergency Department of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2021 were screened. Patients with positive computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) results were classified as the PE group, and those with negative CTPA results were classified as the non-PE group. Demographic characteristics, symptoms, vital signs, underlying diseases, risk factors for venous thrombosis, arterial blood gas analysis and Wells scores were statistically analyzed and compared between the two groups, and the clinical efficacy of PaCO 2 combined with Wells score in predicting acute PE was evaluated. Results:A total of 1 869 patients with suspected acute PE were screened, and 1 492 patients were finally selected. There were 537 cases in the PE group and 955 cases in the non-PE group. The frequency of chest pain, dyspnea, unilateral lower limb edema, history of PE or deep venous thrombosis, history of surgery or immobilization within 3 months, history of fracture within 3 months, active malignant tumor, elevated Wells score and reduced PaCO 2 in the PE group was significantly higher than that in the non-PE group (all P< 0.05). The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of Wells score was 0.784 (95% CI: 0.758-0.810), and the sensitivity and specificity of predicting acute pulmonary embolism were 61.64% and 88.48%, respectively. The AUC of reduced PaCO 2 was 0.679 (95% CI: 0.651-0.707), and the sensitivity and specificity of predicting acute pulmonary embolism were 79.89% and 55.92%, respectively. The AUC of reduced PaCO 2 combined with Wells score was 0.837 (95% CI: 0.816-0.858), and the sensitivity and specificity of predicting acute pulmonary embolism were 74.12% and 77.07%, respectively. The AUC of reduced PaCO 2 combined with Wells score was significantly greater than the AUC of Wells score ( P<0.001) and the AUC of reduced PaCO 2 ( P<0.001). Conclusions:The efficacy of PaCO 2 reduction combined with Wells score in predicting acute PE was superior to that of either of them alone. This was a beneficial supplement to the screening of patients with acute PE, and would also help reduce the abuse of CTPA in the emergency department.

Reducing ultrasound in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis by using clinical scores and D-dimer testing

Background: To reduce unnecessary venous ultrasound examination in cases suspected to have deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in emergency department by using D dimer and wells score. venous duplex is widely used to diagnose DVT increasing burden on ultrasound in overcrowded emergency department. Authors can decrease this burden by using clinical probability scores and D dimer.Methods: This is prospective study done on 50 consecutive patients suspected to have DVT represented to emergency department of   Menoufia University Hospital during the period from June 2018 to June 2019. Full history, physical examination, assessment of clinical probability score, d dimer level and results of venous duplex collection.Results: According to wells score, the majority of cases diagnosed as DVT were of high probability group 13(68.4%), 5 patients with moderate probability and only one patient with low probability was diagnosed as DVT. The mean of D dimer level in cases diagnosed as DVT is (4173.6±2173.1) and in cases without DVT is (927.4±1064.6). Using wells score and D dimer together, sensitivity is 100%, Specificity is 94%. PPV is 90%, and NPV is 100% in predicting DVT. All cases with negative d dimer and low risk probability do not have DVT.Conclusions: Based on this result, using wells score and d dimer level in early work up of patients suspected to have DVT will decrease overusing and cost of venous duplex.

Comparison of values between Wells score and YEARS algorithm in dignosis of pulmonary embolism / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective:To explore the diagnostic values of Wells score and YEARS algorithm in the patients with pulmonary embolism and to compare the areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) of Wells score and YEARS algorithm, and to find the more suitable score method for pulmonary embolism in clinic.Methods:A total of 139patients who were suspected with pulmonary embolism were collected, among them48patients were clinically as confirmed pulmonary embolism.The disease history, clinical manifestation and results of auxilliary examinations of the patients were collected.All the patients were assessed by Wells score and YEARS algorithm, respectively;the computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was considered as golden standard.The sensitivities, specificities, misdiagnosis rates and omission diagnostic rates, and the accuracies of Wells score and YEARS algorithm of the patients in two groups were analyzed with SPSS 22.0software;the conformities of results of Wells socre, YEARS algorithm, and CTPA were analyzed.Then ROC curves of Wells score and YEARS algorithm in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were made, and the AUC was calculated and compared.Results:Compared with YEARS algorithm, the specificity and accuracy of Wells score in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were markedly increased (P＜0.05) , the misdiagnosis rate was decreased (P=0.037) , however the sensitivity and the misdiagnosis rate had no significant differences (P＞0.05) .The Kappa value of Wells score and CTPA was 0.45, the conformity was moderate;the Kappa value of YEARS algorithm and CTPA was 0.22, the conformity was passable;the Kappa value of Wells score and YEARS algorithm was 0.11, the conformity was bad.The AUC of Wells score and YEARS algorithm were 0.753±0.044 (P＜0.01) and 0.585±0.049 (P=0.101) .Conclusion:The Wells score is superior to the YEARS algorithm in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Comparison of values between Wells score and YEARS algorithm in dignosis of pulmonary embolism / 吉林大学学报(医学版)

Objective: To explore the diagnostic values of Wells score and YEARS algorithm in the patients with pulmonary embolism and to compare the areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) of Wells score and YEARS algorithm, and to find the more suitable score method for pulmonary embolism in clinic. Methods: A total of 139 patients who were suspected with pulmonary embolism were collected, among them 48 patients were clinically as confirmed pulmonary embolism. The disease history, clinical manifestation and results of auxilliary examinations of the patients were collected. All the patients were assessed by Wells score and YEARS algorithm, respectively; the computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) was considered as golden standard. The sensitivities, specificities, misdiagnosis rates and omission diagnostic rates, and the accuracies of Wells score and YEARS algorithm of the patients in two groups were analyzed with SPSS 22.0 software; the conformities of results of Wells socre, YEARS algorithm, and CTPA were analyzed. Then ROC curves of Wells score and YEARS algorithm in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were made, and the AUC was calculated and compared. Results: Compared with YEARS algorithm, the specificity and accuracy of Wells score in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were markedly increased (P<0.05), the misdiagnosis rate was decreased (P= 0.037), however the sensitivity and the misdiagnosis rate had no significant differences ( PX). 05). The Kappa value of Wells score and CTPA was 0. 45, the conformity was moderate; the Kappa value of YEARS algorithm and CTPA was 0.22, the conformity was passable; the Kappa value of Wells score and YEARS algorithm was 0. 11, the conformity was bad. The AUC of Wells score and YEARS algorithm were 0. 753 + 0. 044 ( P<0. 01) and 0. 585 + 0. 049 ( P=0. 101). Conclusion: The Wells score is superior to the YEARS algorithm in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Diagnostic value of Wells score and D-Dimer detection in acute pulmonary embolism / 实用医学杂志

Objective To assess the diagnostic value of Wells score and D-Dimer detection in acute pulmonary embolism. Methods Forty-two suspected cases of pulmonary embolism were collected from March 2012 to September 2014 Then Wells score and D-Dimer detection were applied to confirm the disease. Results Of the total, 26 patients were diagnosed by computed tomographic pulmonary arteriography (CTPA). There were 7, 24 and 11 suspected cases which had low, medium and high Wells score respectively. Among them, 1, 15, and 10 cases were diagnosed by CTPA. The diagnosis rates were 14.2% (1/7), 62.5% (15/24) and 90.9%(10/11) respectively. The D-Dimer level in pulmonary embolism group was significantly higher than that in non-embolism group(P < 0.01). The D-Dimer level of cases with medium or high Wells score was higher than those with low Wells score (P < 0.05). Conclusion Wells score combined with D-Dimer is convenient, accurate and safe for predicting acute pulmonary embolism.

The predictive value of Wells score combined with D-dimer in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To evaluate the predictive value of Wells score combined with D-dimer in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.Methods A total of 540 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism admitted from 2008 to 2011 were enrolled for study.The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) was confirmed by using computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA).These patients were divided into two groups:PE group and non-PE group.Comparative analysis was carried out in demographics,underlying diseases,chief complaints,physical signs,venous thrombosis risk factors,laboratory findings and Wells scores between the two groups.Results Of 502 patients selected into this study,there were 246 in PE group and 256 in Non-PE group.The incidence rates of history of recent surgery or bed-ridden,recent fracture of pelvis or lower limb,symptoms of hemoptysis,transient disturbance of consciousness,signs of unilateral lower limb swelling,hypoxia and hypocapnia of arterial blood gas analysis,elevated levels of D dimer,high Wells score in PE group were significantly higher than those in non-PE group (P ＜ 0.05).And there were no statistical difference in other variables found between the two groups.The areas under the ROC curve of Wells score,D-dimer and the combination of the two were 0.775 (95％ CI:0.719-0.831),0.802 (95 ％ CI:0.751-0.853) and 0.899 (95 ％ CI:0.834-0.964),respectively.And the area under the ROC curve of the combination of the two was greater than that of separated application (P ＜ 0.05).When the cut-off value of Wells score was 5 and D-dimer was 1 724 μg/L,the weighted maximum sensitivity and specificity were reached,and these cut-off values were higher than above determined values,the reliability of the diagnosis of PE was obviously increased,and those were lower than these cut-off values,the reliability of excluding PE was also increased.Conclusions Wells score combined with D-dimer showed a higher value in predicting acute pulmonary embolismthan than their separated application.

Clinical analysis of pulmonary embolism patients with plasma D-dimer ＜ 500 μg/L / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To study the value of plasma D-dimer ＜ 500 μg/L level in diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism occurred in patients.Methods The clinical data of the patients with pulmonary embolism confirmed by imaging examination with plasma D-dimer levels ＜ 500 μg/L admitted from January 1st 2008 to June 30th 2011 were analyzed retrospectively.Results Totally,there were ten pulmonary embolism patients with plasma D-dimer levels ＜ 500 μg/L.The 10 eligible patients were assessed for the possibility of pulmonary embolism by using the Wells score (i.e.Wells clinical pretest probability prediction model).Of them,0 cases was evaluated as low clinical pretest probability (grade ＜2),7 cases as moderate clinical pretest probability (grade 2 ～6) and 3 cases as high clinical pretest probability (grade ＞ 6).Conclusions Pulmonary thromboembolism was easily misdiagnosed for lacking specific clinical manifestations and the missed diagnosis in patients caused high mortality,so it was difficult to exclude acute pulmonary embolism simply depending on the D-dimer levels ＜ 500 μg/L.Therefore,in case of plasma D-dimer levels less than 500 μ g/L,the possibility of pulmonary embolism cannot be ruled out in patients with moderate or high Wells clinical pretest probability.

Comparison of the screening effects between Wells and revised Geneva scores on suspected acute pulmonary thromboembolism / 中华急诊医学杂志

Objective To compare the screening effects between Wells and revised Geneva scores on suspected acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APTE),and to explore a optimum screening method for APTE in the emergency department of China.Methods The study was carried out by using random,crossed,prospective methods to compare the screening effects between Wells and revised Geneva scores for 167 suspected APTE patients in the emergency department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University.Results The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of Wells and revised Geneva scores for screening APTE in the emergency department were (0.917 ± 0.022 ) and (0.927 ± 0.020),respectively ( P ＜ 0.05 ).The diagnostic concordance between the two score systems for predicting APTE was poor (Kappa value =0.276 ). In addition, the difference between their hierarchical discrimination for the possibility of APTE was statistically significant ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Compared with revised Geneva score,fewer patients were diagnosed with low clinical probability of APTE and more patients were diagnosed with intermediate or high clinical probability of APTE through Wells score.The patients with low chnical probability of APTE were excluded from pulmonary embolism in Wells or revised Geneva score.At intermediate clinical probability,the accuracy rate of Wells score for predicting APTE (9.64％) was lower than that (32.84％ ) of revised Geneva ( P ＜ 0.05 ).At high clinical probability,there was no significant difference between their accuracy rate [ (67.24％ vs.86.21％),P＞0.05]. Conclusions Revised Geneva score is more suitable than Wells score in screening suspected APTE patients in the emergency department in our country.

Predication of Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for Pulmonary Embolism / 中山大学学报(医学科学版)

[Objective] To reduce misdiagnosis and underdiagnosis rate of pulmonary embolism,the prediction of the revised Geneva score and Wells score for pulmonary embolism were compared and analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves.[Methods] Sixty-five cases with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were collected in the Third Affiliated Hospital of SUN Yat-sen University from January 1998 to October 2008.Of which 44 cases with PE were clinically confirmed.Relevant clinical data were recorded,summarized and the analysis variables were input to SPSS11.0 for statistical analysis.ROC curves was used to evaluate the probability of PE predicted by the Wells and the revised Geneva scores.[Results] Twenty-four patients had a low clinical probability of PE (Wells score ＜ 2 points ),of which 8 (33.3%) had proven PE.The prevalence of PE was 87.2% in the 39 patients with intermediate probability (2-6 points) and 100% in the 2 patients with high probability (＞ 6 points) (P ＝ 0.000).The confirmed PE was 22.2% in the 18 patients with a low probability (Geneva score 0-3 points),82.1% (32/39) in intermediate probability (4-10 points),100% (8/8) in high probability (score ≥11 points) (P ＝ 0.000).The area under curve (AUC) of the ROC curve in the Wells and Geneva scores was 0.785 ± 0.060 and 0.900 ± 0.038,respectively (P ＝ 0.000).The optimal cutoff value was 2 points in the Wells score and 6.5 points in the Geneva score.The Wells score more than 2 points predicted PE with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 76.2%.The Geneva score more than 6 points predicted PE with a sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 100%.The comparison of the area under curve between the Wells and the Geneva score had a significant difference statistically (P ＜ 0.05).[Conclusion] The Wells score and the revised Geneva score are beneficial to predict pulmonary embolism.The revised Geneva score is roughly superior to the Wells score both in sensitivity and specificity.