Farmácia Popular Program: pharmaceutical market analysis of antihypertensive acting on the renin-angiotensin system medicines / Programa Farmácia Popular: análise do mercado farmacêutico de anti-hipertensivos do sistema renina-angiotensina

Abstract This paper aims to analyse changes in the retail pharmaceutical market following policy changes in the Farmácia Popular Program (FP), a medicines subsidy program in Brazil. The retrospective longitudinal analyses focus on therapeutic class of agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system. Data obtained from QuintilesIMS (formerly IMS Health) included private retail pharmacy sales volume (pharmaceutical units) and sales values from 2002 to 2013. Analyses evaluated changes in market share following key FP policy changes. The therapeutic class was selected due to its relevance to hypertension treatment. Market share was analysed by therapeutic sub-classes and by individual company. Losartan as a single product accounted for the highest market share among angiotensin II antagonists. National companies had higher sales volume during the study period, while multinational companies had higher sales value. Changes in pharmaceutical market share coincided with the inclusion of specific products in the list of medicines covered by FP and with increases in or exemption from patient copayment.

Resumo Este artigo visa analisar as mudanças no mercado de varejo farmacêutico, seguindo as alterações de diretiva no Programa Farmácia Popular (FP), que realiza subvenção de medicamentos no Brasil, em parceria pública privada. Foi realizada análise longitudinal retrospectiva dos medicamentos da classe terapêutica dos agentes que atuam sobre o sistema renina-angiotensina. Os dados obtidos do QuintilesIMS incluíram o varejo farmacêutico em termos do volume e valores de vendas de 2002 a 2013. Análises realizadas consideraram intervenções e reformas ocorridas no FP e seu impacto no mercado farmacêutico da classe terapêutica selecionada, devido a sua relevância para o tratamento da hipertensão. Também se examinou o comportamento do mercado tomando por base as empresas farmacêuticas produtoras. Losartan monodroga representou a maior fatia de mercado entre os antagonistas de angiotensina II. Empresas nacionais obtiveram maior volume de vendas durante o período de estudo, enquanto as empresas multinacionais exibiram maior valor de vendas. Mudanças no mercado farmacêutico coincidiram com a inclusão de produtos específicos na lista de medicamentos abrangidos pelo FP e com aumentos ou isenção de copagamento pelos pacientes.

Consumo y costo de antihipertensivos en Cuba en el período 2003-2013 / Consumption and cost of antihypertensive drugs in Cuba in the 2003-2013 period

Objetivo: describir el patrón de utilización de medicamentos antihipertensivos y su costo entre 2003 y 2013. Método: la información sobre el consumo se obtuvo de la base COMEDICS perteneciente a BIOCUBAFARMA, que contiene las especialidades farmacéuticas facturadas al Sistema Nacional de Salud. El consumo se expresó en dosis diarias definidas (DDD) por 1 000 habitantes y día (DHD). Para el cálculo del costo se utilizó el precio de venta a la población en CUP, vigente en las farmacias comunitarias del país. Resultados: el consumo de antihipertensivos en Cuba muestra un marcado incremento en los últimos 10 años, pasó de 100,2 a 268,0 DHD (167,5 por ciento). Para el conjunto de los antihipertensivos, los costos pasaron de 42,9 a 136,3 millones de CUP, para un incremento de 93 millones (217 por ciento). Para el 2013 los IECA representaron el 53 por ciento del consumo total y el 71 por ciento de los costos. Los diuréticos fue el grupo que mostró una mejor relación entre el consumo y los costos; con 28 por ciento del consumo representaron sólo el 9 por ciento de los costos. La introducción del amlodipino, contrario a lo esperado, no generó una disminución del consumo de la nifedipina. Conclusiones: se produjo en el periodo un cambio del patrón de consumo, que se desplazó hacia medicamentos más costosos como el enalapril, el captopril y el amlodipino, con un aumento del costo del tratamiento de la hipertensión(AU)

Objectives: to describe the pattern of use and the cost of antihypertensive drugs in Cuba from 2003 to 2013. Method: information on drug utilization was obtained from the COMEDICS database of the BIOCUBAFARMA which records the number of packages charged to the National Health System. Consumption data were expressed in defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DHD). For estimation of costs, the sale price in Cuban pesos for the population in the community pharmacies of the country was used. Results: the consumption of antihypertensive drugs in Cuba has increased remarkably in the last 10 years, from 100.2 to 268.0 DHD (167,5 percent). Overall costs increased from 42,9 to 136,3 million CUP, accounting for 217 percent increase. In 2013, IECA accounted for 71 percent of the costs and 53 percent of the consumption. The diuretics were the group that showed a better relationship between the consumption and the costs, with 28 percent of the consumption, they just represented 9 percent of the costs. Contrary to expectations, the introduction of amlodipine did not generate a decrease in the consumption of the nifedipine. Conclusions: in the period, the consumption patterns changed and moved toward more expensive medications as enalapril, captopril and amlodipine, which means that the cost of hypertension treatment increased(AU)

Sodium nitroprusside: low price and safe drug to control BP during thrombolysis in AIS / Nitroprussiato de sódio: uma droga segura e de baixo custo para o controle de PA durante a trombólise em AVC isquêmico

This study analyzes the use of sodium nitroprusside (SN) as an option to reduce blood pressure (BP) below 180/105 mmHg during the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients submitted to intravenous thrombolysis.Method The sample was composed by 60 patients who had AIS and were submitted to intravenous rtPA, split in two groups: half in the control group (CG) with BP < 180/105 mmHg and half in SN group with BP > 180/105 mmHg. Outcome variables were any hemorrhagic transformation (HT); the presence of symptomatic HT, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) after 24 hours of treatment; the independence on discharge and death until three months after stroke onset.Results There were no statistical differences between both groups to any of the outcome variables analyzed.Conclusion The SN might be safe for BP control during thrombolysis to AIS.

Este estudo analisa o uso de nitroprussiato de sódio (NS) como uma opção para reduzir a pressão arterial (PA) durante o tratamento do AVC isquêmico agudo (AVCi) em pacientes submetidos à trombólise intravenosa (rtPA).Método A amostra foi composta por 60 pacientes que tiveram AVCi e foram submetidos a rtPA, dividida em dois grupos: 30 pacientes no grupo controle (GC), com PA < 180/105 mmHg e 30 pacientes no grupo NS com PA > 180/105 mmHg. As variáveis analisadas foram qualquer transformação hemorrágica (TH); a presença de TH sintomática, NIHSS após 24 horas de tratamento; a independência na alta e morte até três meses após o AVCi.Resultados Não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos para qualquer das variáveis de desfecho analisadas.Conclusão O NS pode ser seguro para o controle da pressão arterial durante a trombólise no AVCi.

Cost-effectiveness comparison between non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and maximum-tolerated medical therapy for glaucoma within the Brazilian National Health System (SUS) / Comparação de custo-efetividade entre a esclerectomia profunda não penetrante e a terapia clínica máxima tolerada para o glaucoma no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS)

PURPOSE: Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) has emerged as a viable option in the surgical management of open-angle glaucoma. Our aim is to assess the cost-effectiveness of NPDS and to compare it to maximum medical treatment in a 5-year follow-up. METHODS: A decision analysis model was built. Surgical (NPDS) arm of the decision tree was observational (consecutive retrospective case series) and maximum medical treatment arm was hypothetical. Maximum medical therapy was considered a three-drug regimen (association of a fixed combination of timolol/dorzolamide [FCTD] and a prostaglandin analogue [bimatoprost, latanoprost or travoprost]). Cost-effectiveness ratio was defined as direct cost (US dollars) for each percentage of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Horizon was 5 years and perspective is from the public health care service in Brazil (SUS). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. RESULTS: Direct cost for each percentage of IOP reduction in 5 years (cost-effectiveness ratio) was US$ 10.19 for NPDS; US$ 37.45 for the association of a FCTD and bimatoprost; US$ 39.33 for FCTD and travoprost; and US$ 41.42 for FCTD and latanoprost. NPDS demonstrated a better cost-effectiveness ratio, compared to maximum medical therapy. The ICER was negative for all medical treatment options; therefore NPDS was dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some limitations, NPDS was both less costly and more effective than maximum medical therapy. From the Brazilian public health perspective, it was the most cost-effective treatment option when compared to maximum medical therapy (FCTD and prostaglandin).

OBJETIVO: A esclerectomia profunda não penetrante (EPNP) é uma opção viável para o tratamento cirúrgico do glaucoma de ângulo aberto. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a relação custo-efetividade da EPNP e compará-la com terapia clínica máxima (TCM) em um acompanhamento de 5 anos. MÉTODOS: Um modelo de análise de decisão foi proposto comparando-se o tratamento cirúrgico (EPNP) versus a TCM. A avaliação da EPNP foi observacional retrospectiva de uma série consecutiva de casos e da TCM foi hipotética. A TCM foi considerada como o uso de três drogas (associação de uma combinação fixa de timolol/dorzolamida [CFTD] e um análogo de prostaglandina [bimatoprosta, latanoprosta ou travoprosta]). A relação custo-efetividade foi definida com o custo direto (em dólares) para cada porcentual de redução da pressão intraocular (PIO). A razão de custo-efetividade incremental (ICER) foi calculada. O seguimento foi de 5 anos e a perspectiva dos custos é do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). RESULTADOS: O custo direto para cada porcentual de redução da PIO ao final de 5 anos (relação custo-efetividade) foi de US$ 10,19 para a EPNP; US$ 37,45 para a CFTD + bimatoprosta; US$ 39,33 para CFTD + travoprosta; e US$ 41,42 para CFTD + latanoprosta. A EPNP apresentou uma melhor relação custo-efetividade, quando comparada com a TCM. O índice ICER foi negativo, portanto a EPNP foi a opção terapêutica dominante. CONCLUSÃO: A EPNP foi menos custosa e mais efetiva que a TCM. Do ponto de vista do SUS, ela foi a opção mais custo-efetiva, quando comparada com a TCM.

An economic evaluation of antihypertensive therapies based on clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is a major issue in public health, and the financial costs associated with hypertension continue to increase. Cost-effectiveness studies focusing on antihypertensive drug combinations, however, have been scarce. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the traditional treatment (hydrochlorothiazide and atenolol) and the current treatment (losartan and amlodipine) were evaluated in patients with grade 1 or 2 hypertension (HT1-2). For patients with grade 3 hypertension (HT3), a third drug was added to the treatment combinations: enalapril was added to the traditional treatment, and hydrochlorothiazide was added to the current treatment. METHODS: Hypertension treatment costs were estimated on the basis of the purchase prices of the antihypertensive medications, and effectiveness was measured as the reduction in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure (in mm Hg) at the end of a 12-month study period. RESULTS: When the purchase price of the brand-name medication was used to calculate the cost, the traditional treatment presented a lower cost-effectiveness ratio [US$/mm Hg] than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. In the HT3 group, however, there was no difference in cost-effectiveness ratio between the traditional treatment and the current treatment. The cost-effectiveness ratio differences between the treatment regimens maintained the same pattern when the purchase price of the lower-cost medication was used. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the traditional treatment is more cost-effective (US$/mm Hg) than the current treatment in the HT1-2 group. There was no difference in cost-effectiveness between the traditional treatment and the current treatment for the HT3 group.

Inequalities in prescription of hydrochlorothiazide for diabetic hypertensive patients in Colombia / Desigualdades en la prescripción de hidroclorotiazida en pacientes hipertensos diabéticos en Colombia

Objective Evaluating differences in the suitable prescription of thiazides in hypertense patients, according to affiliation regime. Materials and methods This was an analytical cross-sectional study. The database from a previous study was used regarding two groups of hypertense patients (subsidised regime and contributory regime) who had attended out-patient consultation between 01-09-2007 and 29-02-2008. Ideal therapy was evaluated in both groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis was carried out. Results 136 patients (contributory: 41.9 percent; subsidised: 58.1 percent). Subsidised regime patients were older (mean=68.8±10) than those from the contributory regime (mean=64.1±11.1) (t-test, p=0.0110). Prescribing antihypertensive drugs was ideal in 49/136 of the patients (36.0 percent). Ideal prescription accounted for 24/79 (30 percent) of the patients in the subsidised regime and 25/57 (43.8 percent) in the contributory one (OR=1.79; 95 percent CI:0.88-3.64). Older people (aged ≥ 65yo) were at risk of receiving a non-ideal prescription (OR=2.12; 95 percentCI:1.02-4.38) whilst this was not so in the subsidised regime (OR=1.62; 95 percent CI:0.78-3.35). Conclusions Ideal prescription of antihypertensive drugs was low in the population being studied. There were differences regarding age ideal prescription but not concerning affiliation regime. It is suggested that a longitudinal study be carried out in the future.

Objetivo Evaluar las diferencias en la adecuada prescripción de tiazidas en pacientes hipertensos, según régimen de afiliación. Materiales y métodos Estudio de corte transversal analítico. Se utilizó la base de datos de un estudio previo, dos grupos de pacientes hipertensos: régimen subsidiado y régimen contributivo que asistieron a consulta externa entre el 01-09-2007 y el 29-02-2008. Se evaluó terapia ideal en los dos grupos. Se realizó análisis univariado y multivariado. Resultados Se estudiaron 136 pacientes (contributivo: 41,9 por ciento; subsidiado: 58,1 por ciento). Los pacientes del régimen subsidiado fueron mayores (promedio= 68,8±10) que los del contributivo (promedio=64,1±11.1) (t-test, p=0,0110). La prescripción de antihipertensivos fue ideal en 49/136 (36,0 por ciento). En el régimen subsidiado la prescripción fue ideal en 24/79 (30 por ciento) y en el contributivo en 25/57 (43,8 por ciento) (OR: 1,79 IC95 por ciento (0,88-3,64)). La edad ≥65años fue riesgo de prescripción no ideal (OR: 2.12, IC95 por ciento(1,02-4,38)), mientras que no lo fue estar en el régimen subsidiado (OR=1,62, IC95 por ciento(0,78-3,35). Conclusiones La prescripción ideal de antihipertensivos es baja. Hay diferencias en la edad, en la prescripción ideal, mas no por régimen de afiliación. Se sugiere un estudio longitudinal en el futuro.

Avaliação econômica das associações fixas de prostaglandina/prostamida e timolol no tratamento do glaucoma e da hipertensão ocular / Economic evaluation of prostaglandin/prostamide and timolol fixed combinations in the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o custo ao final de 5 anos, a efetividade e a relação custo-efetividade das associações fixas de prostaglandina ou prostamida com timolol 0,5 por cento para o tratamento do glaucoma e da hipertensão ocular no Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil. MÉTODOS: Este estudo transversal avaliou as seguintes associações fixas: bimatoprosta/timolol 0,5 por cento (BT), latanoprosta/timolol 0,5 por cento (LT) e travoprosta/timolol 0,5 por cento (TT). O custo foi calculado a partir do número médio de gotas de 5 frascos de cada associação, da duração (dias) e do preço máximo ao consumidor (PMC). A efetividade na redução da pressão intraocular (PIO) foi obtida na literatura. Para cada uma das associações, calculou-se o custo diário, mensal, anual e em 5 anos. A relação custo-efetividade foi definida como o custo em 5 anos de cada percentual de redução da PIO. RESULTADOS: O PMC, número médio de gotas por frasco e a duração média (dias) foram, respectivamente: R$ 83,07; 109,4 e 54,7 para BT; R$ 126,03; 97,0 e 48,5 para LT e R$ 97,47; 96 e 48,0 para TT. A capacidade de redução percentual da PIO encontrada na literatura foi 35,10 por cento para BT, 35,00 por cento para LT e 34,70 por cento para TT. O custo em 5 anos para cada percentual de redução da PIO foi de R$ 61,02 para BT, R$ 104,71 para LT e R$ 82,53 para TT. A associação BT é dominante sobre as demais. CONCLUSÕES: BT apresentou em 5 anos menor custo e maior efetividade que LT e TT.

PURPOSE:To assess the 5-year cost, effectiveness and costeffectiveness of fixed combinations of prostaglandin or prostamide and timolol 0. 5 percent on glaucoma and/or ocular hypertension in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated the following fixed combinations: bimatoprost/timolol 0. 5 percent (BT), latanoprost/timolol 0. 5 percent (LT) and travoprost/ timolol 0. 5 percent (TT). Cost was obtained through mean number of drops in a sample of 5 containers of each medication, duration (days) and the average wholesale price (AWP). Effectiveness in reducing intraocular pressure IOP was derived from the literature. Daily, monthly, annually and 5-year cost was calculated. Costeffectiveness was defined as cost by each percentage of IOP reduction over 5 years. RESULTS: AWP, mean number of drops and mean duration (days) were: R$ 83. 07; 109. 4 and 54. 7 for BT; R$ 126. 03; 97. 0 and 48. 5 for LT and R$ 97. 47; 96. 0 and 48. 0 for TT. Mean percentage of IOP reduction, obtained from literature, was: 35. 10 percent for BT, 35. 00 percent for LT and 34. 70 percent for TT. Cost-effetiveness ratio (R$/ percent) was: 61. 02 for BT, 104. 71 for LT and 82. 53 for TT. BT was dominant over LT and TT. CONCLUSION: BT presented lower costs and better effectiveness when compared to LT and TT. The most cost-effective fixed combination was BT.

Preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos no Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil / Precios y disponibilidad de medicamentos en el Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil / Medicine prices and availability in the Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program

OBJETIVO: Analisar o desempenho do Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil perante os setores público e privado, em relação a: disponibilidade, preço e custo, para o paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensão e diabetes. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizada a metodologia desenvolvida pela Organização Mundial da Saúde em conjunto com a Ação Internacional para Saúde, para comparação de preços e disponibilidade de medicamentos. A pesquisa foi aplicada em maio de 2007, em estabelecimentos de diferentes setores [público, privado e as modalidades própria (FPB-P) e expansão (FPB-E) do Programa], em 30 municípios do Brasil. Os quatro medicamentos analisados foram: captopril 25mg e hidroclorotiazida 25mg, para hipertensão, e metformina 500mg e glibenclamida 5mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: O FPB-E apresentou maior disponibilidade de medicamentos e o setor público, a menor. Tanto no setor público quanto na FPB-P o percentual de disponibilidade de similares foi maior que o de genéricos...

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the performance of the Programa Farmácia Popular do Brasil (FPB - Brazilian Popular Pharmacy Program) in the public and private sectors, in terms of availability and cost of medicines for hypertension and diabetes. METHODS: The methodology developed by the World Health Organization, in partnership with the Health Action International, was used to compare medicines prices and availability. This study was performed in May 2007, in different sectors (public, private and the Program's government-managed [FPB-P] and private-sector-managed [FPB-E] categories), in 30 cities in Brazil. A total of four medicines were analyzed: captopril 25mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25mg for hypertension; and metformin 500mg and glibenclamide 5mg for diabetes. RESULTS: FPB-E showed greatest medicine availability, while the public sector the lowest. The percentage of availability of similar medicines was higher than that of generic medicines, both in the public sector and in the FPB-P...

OBJETIVO: Analizar el desempeño del Programa Farmacia Popular de Brasil frente a los sectores público y privado, con relación a: disponibilidad, precio y costo para el paciente, de medicamentos para hipertensión y diabetes. MÉTODOS: Fue utilizada la metodología desarrollada por la Organización Mundial de la Salud en conjunto con la Acción Internacional para Salud, para comparar los precios y la disponibilidad de medicamentos. La investigación fue aplicada en mayo de 2007, en establecimientos de diferentes sectores [público, privado y las modalidades propia (FPB-P) y expansión (FPB-E) del Programa], en 30 municipios de Brasil. Los cuatro medicamentos analizados fueron: captopril 25 mg e hidroclorotiazida 25 mg, para hipertensión, y metformina 500 mg y glibenclamida 5 mg, para diabetes. RESULTADOS: El FPB-E presentó mayor disponibilidad de medicamentos y el sector público, la menor. Tanto en el sector público como en la FPB-P el porcentaje de disponibilidad de similares fue mayor que el de los genéricos...

Considerações sobre o ângulo de administração de colírios antiglaucomatosos análogos das prostaglandinas / Considerations about administration angle of prostaglandin analogs

OBJETIVO: Investigar se há diferença no peso e volume das gotas de colírios análogos das prostaglandinas em ângulos de gotejamento de 45º e 90º com relação ao plano horizontal. MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo experimental utilizando os colírios latanoprosta, travoprosta e bimatoprosta, pelo qual se gotejava as soluções com angulação de 45º e 90º. Estes colírios foram escolhidos em virtude do seu uso rotineiro em oftalmologia e do seu custo. A primeira gota e dez gotas seguintes foram pesadas em ângulo de 45º e 90º. A análise estatística foi realizada por meio do programa SPSS® 12.0 (Microsoft), utilizando o teste de variância ANOVA, sendo considerada diferença estatisticamente significante um valor P<0,001. RESULTADOS: Verificou-se que há diferença no peso, e conseqüentemente no volume, das gotas instiladas a 45º e a 90º dos colírios de travoprosta e bimatoprosta. Para o colírio travoprosta o gotejo a 45º produz uma gota menor que em 90º. O inverso ocorre para o colírio de bimatoprosta. Já para o colírio de latanoprosta, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante. CONCLUSÕES: Como houve diferença estatística no peso das gotas de dois colírios análogos das prostaglandinas e em outro não se verificou esta variação, - e como este possui relação direta com o volume - infere-se que devemos ser críticos diante de estimativas de custo ou duração da terapia com base no gotejamento dos colírios considerando número de gotas por frasco e volume.

PURPOSE: To investigate if there is any difference in volume and drop weight of prostaglandin analogs when adopting drip angles of 45º and 90º, regarding a horizontal line. METHODS: An experimental study was conducted using the follow ophthalmic solutions: latanoprost, travoprost and bimatoprost. In this study the ophthalmic solutions were dripped according to an angle of 45º or 90º. Prostaglandin analogs were chosen due to their common use in ophthalmology and their cost. The first drop and other ten drops were weighed, alternating the drip angle (45º or 90º). Statistical analysis was done with SPSS® 12.0 (Microsoft), using quantitative comparisons with the ANOVA test. An odds value (P) below 0.001 was considered a statistical significant difference. RESULTS: We verified differences in weight and size of the travoprost and bimatoprost drops instilled at 45º and 90º. The drip at 45º produces a smaller drop of travoprost (P<0.001), and the inverse occurs for bimatoprost. There were no statistical significant differences in weight of latanoprost drops according to the instillation angle. CONCLUSIONS: Once there was statistical difference in weight - which has direct relationship with size - of the drops of two kinds of prostaglandin analogs and in another one we did not observe this variation, we infer that cost and therapy duration estimates should be analyzed carefully, especially if this kind of drip measure is used.

Patrón y costo del tratamiento antihipertensivo para pacientes ambulatorios en un hospital general / Pattern and costs of the antihypertensive treatment for ambulatory patients in a general hospital

El manejo de la hipertensión arterial (HTA) es muy variable e individualizado por lo que la prescripción y el costo del mismo influyen en la accesibilidad y adherencia al tratamiento. OBJETIVO: Determinar la prescripción antihipertensiva usada y los costos de la misma en pacientes que acuden a un hospital general. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio transversal y descriptivo de la prescripción ambulatoria de medicamentos antihipertensivos de los pacientes atendidos en el Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza de Lima en el año 2003. Se registraron los nombres de los fármacos prescritos tanto con el denominador común internacional (DCI) como con el de marca comercial (MC) y se determinó el costo de la terapia en función al precio de venta sugerido al público. RESULTADOS: De un total de 303 historias clínicas de pacientes hipertensos, sólo el 4,9% de ellos registró un adecuado control de la HTA.Las drogas antihipertensivas prescritas como primera elección pertenecieron al grupo de los inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de angiotensina (IECA) en un 70,5%, seguido de los calcioantagonistas (CA) en 11,7%, los beta-bloqueadores en 6,4% y otros en11,4%. Las drogas prescritas como segunda elección pertenecieron al grupo de los diuréticos tiazídicos en 58,9%, los CA en 17,9%, los IECA en 13,7%, y otras drogas en 9,5%. El fármaco de primera línea con mayor prescripción fue el enalapril (53,8%), y el fármaco de segunda línea con mayor prescripción fue la hidroclorotiazida (50,0%). Se utilizó fármacos de MC en 13,6% del total de las prescripciones. Se calculó un costo promedio mensual de la terapia antihipertensiva prescrita de 33,9 nuevos soles, elevándose el costo en un 28,4% al haber sido prescrita en la modalidad de MC de forma parcial. CONCLUSIONES: A pesar de los beneficios ampliamente demostrados de la terapia con diuréticos tiazídicos, el uso de este fármaco es bajo; asimismo...

In our hospitals, the treatment of hypertension is highly variable and individualized, with prescriptions and costs that influence on treatment accessibility and compliance. OBJECTIVE: To know the class and costs of the antihypertensive therapy in a general hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A transversal and descriptive study was done on the prescription of antihypertensive drugs from ambulatorypatients during 2003 in the Hospital Nacional Arzobispo Loayza of Lima. International Common Names and Trademark Names were registered and the cost of therapy was calculated witheach drug‘s price. RESULTS: Three hundred and three medical records were collected. An optimal control of blood pressure was registered in only 4,9%. First choice antihypertensive class drugwas angiotensin converter enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) in 70,5%, followed by calcium channel blockers (CCB) in 11,7%, beta blockers (BB) in 6,4% and other drugs 11,4%. Second choice antihypertensive class drug was thiazide diuretics in 58,9%, CCB in 17,9%, ACEI in 13,7% and other drugs 9,5%. Most prescribed first line drug was enalapril in 53,8% and most prescribed second line drug was hydrochlorothiazide in 50,0%. Trademark Names prescriptionswere done in 13,6%. The monthly cost of the antihypertensive therapy was S/ 33,9 nuevos soles with an increase of 28,4% because of partially prescribed Trademark Names drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite of the known benefits of thiazide diuretic therapy,the use of this class of drug was low, and that the prescription of Trademark Names drugs increases the monthly average cost of therapy.

Metabolic syndrome patient compliance with drug treatment

OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the compliance with drug treatment in patients with metabolic syndrome. 2) To determine association between access to and use of medicines, as well as the level of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and compliance. INTRODUCTION: Low compliance has been one of the greatest challenges for the successful treatment of chronic diseases. Although this issue has been widely studied in patients with isolated hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia, compliance studies involving patients with these concomitant diseases or with metabolic syndrome diagnosis are scarce. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving patients who have been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome according to the IDF criteria. Patients were being treated in a Health-Medical School Center bound to the Public Brazilian Healthcare System. This study was conducted in two phases. Phase I was characterized by analyzing medical records and Phase II involved interviewing the patients. A variation of the Morisky-Green Test was used to evaluate compliance. Compliance was the dependent variable and the independent variables included access to medicines, the use of medicines and the level of knowledge concerning cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-three patients were identified as being eligible for Phase II, and 75 were included in the study. The average level of compliance was 5.44 points (standard deviation of 0.68), on a scale ranging from 1.00 to 6.00 points. There was no statistically meaningful association between independent variables and compliance. The level of patient knowledge of diet and dyslipidemia was considered to be low. CONCLUSIONS: Patients involved in this study exhibited a high level of compliance with drug treatment. Further research is needed to better elucidate the compliance behavior of patients who have been diagnosed with metabolic syndrome.

The impact of losartan on the lifetime incidence of ESRD and costs in Mexico / El impacto del losartan en la incidencia de por vida de la enfermedad renal de la etapa terminal y sus costos en México

Background. The RENAAL (Reduction of Endpoints in Type 2 Diabetes with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) study demonstrated that treatment with losartan reduced the risk of ESRD by 29% among hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. The objective of this study was to project the effect of losartan compared to placebo on the lifetime incidence of ESRD and associated costs from a third-party payer perspective in Mexico. Methods. A competing risks method was used to estimate lifetime incidence of ESRD, while accounting for the risk of death without ESRD. The cost associated with ESRD was estimated by combining the cumulative incidence of ESRD with the lifetime cost associated with ESRD. Total cost was estimated as the sum of the cost associated with ESRD from the three main public institutions in Mexico, the lifetime cost of losartan therapy, and other costs (non-ESRD/non-losartan) expected for patients with type 2 diabetes. Survival was estimated by weighting the life expectancies with and without ESRD by the cumulative risk of ESRD. Results. The projected lifetime incidence of ESRD for losartan patients was lower (66%) compared with placebo patients (83%). This reduction in ESRD resulted in a decrease in ESRD-related cost of M$49,737 per patient and a discounted gain of 0.697 life years per patient. After accounting for the cost of losartan and the additional cost associated with greater survival, we projected that treatment with losartan would result in a net savings of M$24,073 per patient. Conclusion. Treatment with losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy not only reduced the within-trial incidence of ESRD but is projected to result in lifetime reductions in ESRD, increased survival, and overall cost savings to public institutions in Mexico.

Antecedentes. El estudio RENAAL (Reducción de los grados o puntos terminales en la diabetes tipo 2 con losartan, el antagonista de la anglotenslna II) demostró que el tratamiento con losartan redujo el riesgo de la ESRD (enfermedad renal de la etapa terminal) en 29% entre pacientes hipertensos con diabetes tipo 2 y neuropatía diabética. El propósito estudiado fue hacer una proyección del efecto del losartan comparándolo con el placebo en la incidencia de por vida de la ESRD y con los costos asociados de un tercer pagador en perspectiva en México. Métodos. Se utilizó un método de riesgos muy competitivo para calcular la incidencia de por vida de la ESRD, al mismo tiempo que se calculaba el riesgo de muerte sin la ESRD. El costo asociado con la ESRD se calculó confirmando la incidencia acumulativa de la ESRD en relación con el costo de por vida de la terapia con losar-tan y otros costos (sin ESRD o sin losartan) con los que se contaba para pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. La supervivencia se calculó esperando las expectativas de vida con y sin ESRD por el riesgo acumulativo de ESRD. Resultados. La proyectada incidencia de por vida de la ESRD en cuanto a los pacientes con losartan fue más baja (66%) comparada con los pacientes que tomaron placebo (83%). Esta reducción de la ESRD tuvo por resultado una disminución en el costo relacionado con la ESRD de $49,737 por paciente y una ganancia descartada de 0.697 años de vida por paciente. Luego de contabilizar el costo del losartan y el costo añadido asociado con una mayor supervivencia, llegamos a la conclusión de que el tratamiento con losartan daría por resultado un ahorro neto de $24,073 por paciente. Conclusión. El tratamiento mediante losartan en pacientes aquejados de diabetes tipo 2 y neuropatía no sólo redujo la incidencia intraexperimental de la ESRD, sino que además nos ha servido para proyectar que resulte en reducciones de por vida en la ESRD, en una supervivencia incrementada y en un ahorro total de costos en cuanto a las instituciones públicas en nuestro país.

Prescribing patterns and cost of antihypertensive drugs in an internal medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND: Antihypertensive agents are selected primarily for their ability to prevent morbidity and mortality related to hypertension. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prescribing trends and the cost of antihypertensive drugs were studied in 300 patients attending an internal medicine clinic. Beta-blockers were the most frequently used group of drugs (46.7%), followed by calcium-channel antagonists (34.3%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (30%). Diuretics were used in only 13.2% of the prescriptions. Atenolol (36%), amlodipine (29.3%) and enalapril (19%) were the most frequently used individual drugs. Propranolol, furosemide, amlodipine and atenolol were the least expensive drugs used, with annual drug acquisition costs of Rs 80, 102, 182 and 318, respectively. Benazepril (Rs 1778), diltiazem SR (Rs 1777), lisinopril (Rs 1660), prazosin (Rs 1416) and losartan (Rs 1365) were the most expensive drugs in terms of annual drug acquisition costs. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study emphasize the need to encourage frequent use of diuretics. Since the costs of different antihypertensives vary considerably, newer and relatively expensive antihypertensives should be prescribed only when clearly indicated.

Principles of drug therapy in hypertension.

The most difficult diagnosis in medicine is the diagnosis of hypertension. Since this label encompasses many maladies both known (secondary hypertension), and the unknown, the office recording of blood pressure alone will not suffice to warrant treatment with drugs right away. There are more than 6 major guidelines in the world about the rules of the game of drug therapy in hypertension. The present preoccupation with newer drugs as first line antihypertensive drugs would ruin any economy, if the exchequer is to foot the bill. The stress in drug treatment has been the step-care mode of drug therapy where one starts with one drug in small doses, building the dose gradually, adding the next drug to get cumulative power to lower the pressure. Since the early seventies, the need to step-down therapy is being stressed wherein the doctor starts cutting down the drugs and the dosage, once he achieves the desired blood pressure levels. Diuretics and beta-blockers should be the first choice when drugs are indicated, unless there are positive indications for other drugs, or the first line drugs are contra-indicated. Routine treatment with drugs is recommended by the American JNC for people with sustained blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg, but the British recommendations put the cut off at the pressure level of 160/100 mm Hg. Indian patients respond to very small doses in the beginning. The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study failed to demonstrate a significant difference between the 3 randomised target blood pressure groups for the majority of cardiovascular events, although it did prove the theoretical hypothesis, that more vigorous treatment could certainly bring down the measured blood pressure to greater extent in 90% of patients I Greater importance will be given in the future for the non-pharmacological approaches, as well as to baseline blood pressure values, at which drug treatment should be started.