Cross over placebo control trial of dilazep in beta-thalassemia/hemoglobin E patients.

An attempt was made to find better symptomatic treatment for beta-thalassemia/hemoglobin E (beta-thal/Hb E) patients in order to reduce their blood demand. Oral administration of dilazep was prescribed for these patients and a clinical trial was conducted over a 2-year period as a cross over placebo control study. Seventeen beta-thal/Hb E patients were enrolled in the study. All of them received dilazep and placebo for 10 months at different periods of time and were taken care of by the same doctor throughout the study. The blood demand of the same patients during the period of receiving dilazep with the period of receiving placebo, was 1.5 +/- 1.8 U/10 months versus 2.2 +/- 2.6 U/10 months, respectively. Thus dilazep showed a benefit in decreasing the blood demand by about 50% although the results did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). There was a statistical difference in hemoglobin concentration of the patients receiving dilazep compared with placebo (p = 0.038). While receiving dilazep the mean +/- SD hemoglobin level was 5.82 +/- 0.8 g/dl, significantly higher than while receiving placebo (5.66 +/- 0.9 g/dl) (p = 0.038). The liver, and renal function tests, and cardiac enzyme levels of the patients showed no significant changes throughout the study. However, one case had a problem with bleeding following tooth extraction whilst receiving dilazep and needed 1 unit of blood transfusion. In conclusion, administration of dilazep to patients with beta-thal/Hb E increased the patients' hemoglobin and reduced their blood demand with few side effects.

A double-blind placebo control trial of dilazep in beta-thalassemia/hemoglobin E patients.

Since the obtained results from the pilot study indicated that dilazep which was a membrane stabilizer would be benefit to treatment and prevention of anemia and chronic leg ulcer in beta-thalassemia/hemoglobin E (beta-thal/HbE) patients, the authors had continued the study in a second phase, ie a double blind placebo control trial. Twenty-seven beta-thal/HbE patients were recruited in the study. Eight patients who suffered from chronic leg ulcer were given dilazep. The rest of patients were given dilazep or placebo according to a randomized table. Hence, 16 patients received dilazep and 11 received placebo. When we compared the number of unit of blood transfusion, hemoglobin level, 2-3 DPG and P50 value between the dilazep and placebo groups using unpaired t-test, we found that there were no statistical differences in any of the parameters. However, when we compared the data within the group using paired t-test, there was statistical decrease in blood requirement after treatment in the dilazep group (p < 0.05). Concerning with the treatment of chronic leg ulcer, 3 in 8 patients were completely healed within 3 months, 4 in 8 patients were improved and 1 in 8 patients was not improved. There were complaints of skin itching and mild epigastric pain in placebo group but the liver function tests, kidney function tests and cardiac enzyme did not significantly change during the medication.