ABSTRACT
We aimed to evaluate ten-year outcomes of penile prosthesis (PP) implantation for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and to assess predictors of early prosthetic infection (EPI). We identified 549 men who underwent 576 PP placements between 2008 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify potential predictors of EPI. An EPI predictive nomogram was developed. Thirty-five (6.1%) cases of EPI were recorded with an explant rate of 3.1%. In terms of satisfaction, 82.0% of the patients defined themselves as "satisfied," while partner's satisfaction was 88.3%. Diabetes (P = 0.012), longer operative time (P = 0.032), and reinterventions (P = 0.048) were associated with EPI risk, while postoperative ciprofloxacin was inversely associated with EPI (P = 0.014). Rifampin/gentamicin-coated 3-piece inflatable PP (r/g-c 3IPP) showed a higher EPI risk (P = 0.019). Multivariate analyses showed a two-fold higher risk of EPI in diabetic patients, redo surgeries, or when a r/g-c 3IPP was used (all P < 0.03). We showed that diabetes, longer operative time, and secondary surgeries were the risk factors for EPI. Postoperative ciprofloxacin was associated with a reduced risk of EPI, while r/g-c 3IPP had higher EPI rates without an increased risk of PP explant. After further validation, the proposed nomogram could be a useful tool for the preoperative counseling of PP implantation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Penile Implantation , Penile Prosthesis , Penis/surgery , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
Penile prosthetic implantation represents a cornerstone for patients with organic erectile dysfunction (ED) that is refractory, unsatisfactory, or contra-indicated for other approved medical or mechanical options. In this study, we introduce the "Ghattas technique," wherein we constructed a polypropylene mesh sheath that surrounds and is fixed to a 13-mm malleable prosthesis cylinder, which can increase the cylinder diameter for cases that need a larger prosthesis. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation and completed the five-item International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-5). Postoperative outcomes were evaluated by IIEF-5 and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaires at final follow-up. The mean age of the 23 included patients was 57.9 (standard deviation [s.d.]: 11.4) years and the mean duration of ED was 8.5 (s.d.: 7.9) years. Erection improvement was determined by comparing mean preoperative and postoperative IIEF-5 scores (8.3 [s.d.: 3.9] vs 24.6 [s.d.: 0.6], P < 0.001). High treatment satisfaction was determined according to a mean EDITS score of 94.9 (s.d.: 9.9). The proposed Ghattas technique was safe and effective in our patients, and provides opportunity for cases that need a diameter larger than 13 mm. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.
Subject(s)
Child , Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Penile Prosthesis , Surgical Mesh , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
General recommendations regarding surgical techniques are not always appropriate for all Peyronie's disease (PD) patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of plication procedures in PD patients with severe penile curvature and the effects of early surgical correction in patients who no longer have progressive deformities. The clinical data from 72 patients who underwent plication procedures were analyzed in this study. Patients were divided into Groups A and B according to the curvature severity (≤60° or >60°) and Groups 1 and 2 according to the duration of disease stabilization (≥3 months or <3 months). At the 1-year follow-up, 90.0% (36/40) and 90.6% (29/32) patients reported complete penile straightening, and 60.0% (24/40) and 100.0% (32/32) patients reported penile shortening in Groups A and B, respectively. No curvature recurrence occurred in any patient, and no significant differences were observed in postoperative International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF), erectile pain, sensitivity, or suture knots on the penis whether such outcomes were grouped according to the curvature severity or the duration of stabilization. However, the duration from symptom onset to surgical management in Group 1 was significantly longer than that in Group 2 (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 20.9 ± 2.0 months and 14.3 ± 1.2 months, respectively, P < 0.001). The present study showed that the plication procedures seemed to be an effective choice for the surgical treatment of PD patients with severe penile curvature. In addition, the early surgical treatment seemed to benefit those patients who already had no erectile pain and no longer exhibited progressive deformity.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Pelvic Pain , Penile Induration/surgery , Penis/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Penile Prosthesis , Urinary Sphincter, Artificial , Penile Implantation , Erectile Dysfunction/surgerySubject(s)
Humans , Male , Penile Prosthesis , Penile Implantation , Diabetes Mellitus , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Salvage TherapyABSTRACT
Peyronie's disease is a common condition resulting in penile deformity, psychological bother, and sexual dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction is one common comorbid condition seen in men with Peyronie's disease, and its presence significantly impacts treatment considerations. In a man with Peyronie's disease and significant erectile dysfunction who desires the most reliable treatment, penile prosthesis placement should be strongly considered. In some instances, such as those patients with relatively mild curvature, prosthesis placement alone may result in adequate straightening. However, many patients will require additional straightening maneuvers such as manual modeling, penile plication, and tunica albuginea incision with or without grafting. For patients with severe penile shortening, penile length restoration techniques may also be considered. Herein, we provide a comprehensive clinical review of penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie's disease. Specifically, we discuss preoperative indications, intraoperative considerations, adjunctive straightening maneuvers, and postoperative outcomes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation/methods , Penile Induration/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Suture Techniques , Traction , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methodsABSTRACT
Inflatable penile prostheses are an important tool in the treatment of medically refractory erectile dysfunction. One of the major complications associated with these prostheses is infections, which ultimately require device explanation and placement of a new device. Over the past several decades, significant work has been done to reduce infection rates and optimize treatment strategies to reduce patient morbidity. This article reviews the current state of knowledge surrounding penile prosthesis infections, with attention to the evidence for methods to prevent infection and best practices for device reimplantation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Bandages , Carrier State/drug therapy , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Coated Materials, Biocompatible , Device Removal , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/therapy , Hair Removal/methods , Immunocompromised Host/immunology , Penile Implantation/methods , Penile Prosthesis , Preoperative Care/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/therapy , Reoperation , Risk Factors , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/therapy , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidis , Surgical Drapes , Surgical Instruments , Surgical Wound Infection/therapyABSTRACT
Penile prosthesis implantation is the gold standard of surgical therapy for patients with medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. However, this umbrella definition includes significant heterogeneity and associated risk profiles that should be candidly discussed and addressed perioperatively. Factors associated with operative success and patient satisfaction are often surgery specific; however, risk profiling via patient selection, preoperative optimization, proper device selection, and intraoperative consideration are highly correlated. Some examples of common risk profiles include comorbidity(ies) such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, prior abdominal surgery, Peyronie's disease, and psychological risk factors. Similarly, integration of surgeon- and patient-amenable characteristics is key to decreasing risk of infection, complication, and need for revision. Finally, patient risk profiling provides a unique context for proper device selection and evidence-based intraoperative considerations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Satisfaction , Patient Selection , Penile Implantation/methods , Penile Induration/epidemiology , Penile Prosthesis , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Reoperation , Risk Assessment , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & controlABSTRACT
The global population is collectively getting older, and age is directly correlated with erectile dysfunction (ED). With the advent of effective oral agents and wide availability of the Internet, a larger portion of the population is becoming aware of the different treatment options for men with ED. The penile prosthesis is a definitive and effective treatment for ED which has been available for just over half a century.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation , Penile ProsthesisABSTRACT
Since their popularization, genitourinary prosthetics have remained a gold-standard therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence and in cases of testicular loss or dysfunction. They have also represented an area of significant innovation, which has contributed to excellent long-term outcomes. Given this history, the objective of the current review was to provide a 5-10-year outlook on anticipated trends and developments in the field of genitourinary prosthetics. To accomplish this objective, a PubMed and patent search was performed of topics relating to penile and testicular prostheses and urinary sphincters. In regard to penile prostheses, findings demonstrated several new concepts including temperature-sensitive alloys, automated pumps, devices designed specifically for neophalluses, and improved malleable designs. With artificial urinary sphincters, new concepts include the ability to add or remove fluid from an existing system, two-piece systems, and new mechanisms to occlude the urethra. For testicular prosthetics, future implementations may not only better replicate the feel of a biological testicle but also add endocrinological functions. Beyond device innovation, the future of prosthetics is also one of expanding geographic boundaries, which necessitates variable cost modeling and regulatory considerations. Surgical trends are also changing, with a greater emphasis on nonnarcotic, postoperative pain control, outpatient surgeries, and adjunctive techniques to lengthen the penis and address concomitant stress incontinence, among others. Concomitant with device and surgical changes, future considerations also include a greater need for education and training, particularly given the rapid expansion of sexual medicine into developing nations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation , Penile Prosthesis/trends , Prostheses and Implants/trends , Prosthesis Design/trends , Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Testicular Diseases/surgery , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urinary Sphincter, Artificial/trends , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/trendsABSTRACT
The field of prosthetic urology demonstrates the striking impact that simple devices can have on quality of life. Penile prosthesis and artificial urinary sphincter implantation are the cornerstone procedures on which this specialty focuses. Modern research largely concentrates on decreasing the rates of complication and infection, as the current devices offer superior rates of satisfaction when revision is not necessary. These techniques are also able to salvage sexual function and continence in more difficult patient populations including female-to-male transgender individuals, those with ischemic priapism, and those with erectile dysfunction and incontinence secondary to prostatectomy. This review summarizes modern techniques, outcomes, and complications in the field of prosthetic urology.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation/methods , Penile Prosthesis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Urethra/injuries , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urinary Retention/epidemiology , Urinary Sphincter, Artificial , UrologyABSTRACT
For patients with moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction, implantable penile prostheses continue to be a viable treatment. Medical device developers apply design controls during the development cycle to ensure that a product performs as intended in the final use environment. This process relies heavily on the principles of systems engineering and documents every facet of performance, unmet need, and risk. To better understand design philosophy, it is important to frame benchmarked performance outcomes in the context of the ideal state. Careful consideration of erectile anatomy and physiology, including flaccid state, transitional phases, and full tumescence, informs penile prosthesis design philosophy and provides the foundation for product advancement.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Biomedical Engineering , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation , Penile Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Systems AnalysisABSTRACT
With the onset of a metabolic syndrome epidemic and the increasing life expectancy, erectile dysfunction (ED) has become a more common condition. As incidence and prevalence increase, the medical field is focused on providing more appropriate therapies. It is common knowledge that ED is a chronic condition that is also associated with a myriad of other disorders. Conditions such as aging, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, prostatic hypertrophy, and prostate cancer, among others, have a direct implication on the onset and progression of ED. Characterization and recognition of risk factors may help clinicians recognize and properly treat patients suffering from ED. One of the most reliable treatments for ED is penile prosthetic surgery. Since the introduction of the penile prosthesis (PP) in the early seventies, this surgical procedure has improved the lives of thousands of men, with reliable and satisfactory results. The aim of this review article is to characterize the epidemiology of men undergoing penile prosthetic surgery, with a discussion about the most common conditions involved in the development of ED, and that ultimately drive patients into electing to undergo PP placement.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Diabetes Complications/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Hypertension , Impotence, Vasculogenic/surgery , Pelvic Bones/injuries , Penile Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Penile Induration/surgery , Penile Prosthesis , Penis/injuries , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Radiation Injuries/surgery , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Reoperation , Spinal Cord Injuries/epidemiology , Vascular Diseases/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the standard of care in men with severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following prostate surgery and radiation. While the current AUS provides an effective, safe, and durable treatment option, it is not without its limitations and complications, especially with regard to its utility in some "high-risk" populations. This article provides a critical review of relevant publications pertaining to AUS surgery in specific high-risk groups such as men with spinal cord injury, revision cases, concurrent penile prosthesis implant, and female SUI. The discussion of each category includes a brief review of surgical challenge and a practical action-based set of recommendations. Our increased understandings of the pathophysiology of various SUI cases coupled with effective therapeutic strategies to enhance AUS surgery continue to improve clinical outcomes of many patients with SUI.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Reoperation , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/surgery , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urinary Sphincter, ArtificialABSTRACT
Penile prosthesis implant (PPI) remains an effective and safe treatment option for men with erectile dysfunction (ED). However, PPI surgery can be associated with a higher risk of complications in certain populations. This article provides a critical review of relevant publications pertaining to PPI in men with diabetes, significant corporal fibrosis, spinal cord injury, concurrent continence surgery, and complex salvage cases. The discussion of each category of special populations includes a brief review of the surgical challenges and a practical action-based set of recommendations. While specific patient populations posed considerable challenges in PPI surgery, strict pre- and postoperative management coupled with safe surgical practice is a prerequisite to achieving excellent clinical outcomes and high patient satisfaction rate.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Diabetes Complications , Diabetes Mellitus , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Implantation , Penile Induration/surgery , Penile Prosthesis , Priapism/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Salvage Therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Suburethral Slings , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Urinary Incontinence/surgery , Urinary Sphincter, ArtificialSubject(s)
Humans , Animals , Male , Rats , Dipyridamole , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penis , Prostatectomy , Penile Erection , ApoptosisABSTRACT
Penile prostheses are subject to a continuous development and have gained better mechanical reliability and safety during the last decades. In this study, we aimed to investigate the outcomes and satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and semirigid penile prosthesis (SPP) implantation.
From August 2001 to June 2012, 257 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) underwent penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) at our institution. Of the 257 patients, 118 underwent implantation of IPP and 139 underwent SPP implantation. The pre-operative and post-operative erectile status of the patients were assessed by international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire. The satisfaction of patients and partners were evaluated by a telephone interview using the erectile dysfunction inventory of treatment satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire and EDITS partner survey.
The overall major complication rate was higher in IPP group. PPI led to a significant improvement in IIEF scores in both groups. For IPP and SPP groups the average EDITS scores were 78±11and 57±8, respectively, and that for the partners were 72±10 and 49±7, respectively (p<0.05).
Although the IPP implantation have better satisfaction rates, the SPP implantation is still a viable treatment option in the surgical treatment of ED because of low cost and high durability with acceptable satisfaction rates.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Erectile Dysfunction/surgery , Penile Prosthesis , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Penile Implantation/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications , Prosthesis Design , Penile Prosthesis/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sexual Partners , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Penile implant usage dates to the 16th century yet penile implants to treat erectile dysfunction did not occur until nearly four centuries later. The modern era of penile implants has progressed rapidly over the past 50 years as physicians' knowledge of effective materials for penile prostheses and surgical techniques has improved. Herein, we describe the history of penile prosthetics and the constant quest to improve the technology. Elements of the design from the first inflatable penile prosthesis by Scott and colleagues and the Small-Carrion malleable penile prosthesis are still found in present iterations of these devices. While there have been significant improvements in penile prosthesis design, the promise of an ideal prosthetic device remains elusive. As other erectile dysfunction therapies emerge, penile prostheses will have to continue to demonstrate a competitive advantage. A particular strength of penile prostheses is their efficacy regardless of etiology, thus allowing treatment of even the most refractory cases.