ABSTRACT
Fentanyl as a synthetic opioid works by binding to the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) in brain areas to generate analgesia, sedation and reward related behaviors. As we know, cerebellum is not only involved in sensory perception, motor coordination, motor learning and precise control of autonomous movement, but also important for the mood regulation, cognition, learning and memory. Previous studies have shown that functional MORs are widely distributed in the cerebellum, and the role of MOR activation in cerebellum has not been reported. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of fentanyl on air-puff stimulus-evoked field potential response in the cerebellar molecular layer using in vivo electrophysiology in mice. The results showed that perfusion of 5 μmol/L fentanyl on the cerebellar surface significantly inhibited the amplitude, half width and area under the curve (AUC) of sensory stimulation-evoked inhibitory response P1 in the molecular layer. The half-inhibitory concentration (IC
Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Cerebellum , Evoked Potentials , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Interneurons , Physical StimulationABSTRACT
Abstract Study objective: In this study, we aimed to compare the antimicrobial effects of bupivacaine and fentanyl citrate and to reveal the impact on antimicrobial effect potential in the case of combined use. Design: In vitro prospective study. Setting: University Clinical Microbiology Laboratory. Measurements: In our study, in vitro antimicrobial effect of 0.05 mg.mL-1 fentanyl citrate, 5 mg.mL-1 bupivacaine were tested against Staphylococcus aureus American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 29213, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Candida albicans ATCC 10231 as Group F (Fentanyl Citrate) and Group B (Bupivacaine), respectively. S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were cultured onto Mueller Hinton agar (Oxoid, UK) plates and Candida albicans ATCC 10231 were cultured onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (Oxoid, UK) plates for 18-24 hours at 37 °C. Main results: In terms of inhibition zone diameters, S. Aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and C. albicans ATCC10231 values obtained after 12 and 24 hours of incubation were significantly higher in Group F than Group B (p < 0.001). In terms of inhibition zone diameters, E. coli ATCC 25922, and K. pneumomiae ATCC 13883 values obtained after 12 and 24 hours of incubation were significantly higher in Group B than Group F (p < 0.001, E. coli 12ª hour p = 0.005). Conclusions: Addition of fentanyl to Local Anesthetics (LAs) is often preferred in regional anesthesia applications in today's practice owing especially to its effect on decreasing the local anesthetic dose and increasing analgesia quality and patient satisfaction. However, when the fact that fentanyl antagonized the antimicrobial effects of LAs in the studies is taken into account, it might be though that it contributes to an increase in infection complications. When the fact that fentanyl citrate which was used in our study and included hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide as protective agents, broadened the antimicrobial effect spectrum of LAs, had no antagonistic effect and showed a synergistic antimicrobial effect against E. Coli is considered, we are of the opinion that the addition of fentanyl to LAs would contribute significantly in preventing the increasing regional anesthesia infection complications.
Resumo Objetivo: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar os efeitos antimicrobianos da bupivacaína e citrato de fentanil e revelar o impacto no potencial do efeito antimicrobiano no caso de uso combinado. Desenho: Estudo prospectivo in vitro. Local: Laboratório de Microbiologia Clínica da Universidade. Medidas: Em nosso estudo, os efeitos antimicrobianos in vitro do citrato de fentanil na concentração de 0,05 mg.mL-1 - Grupo F e da bupivacaína na concentração de 5 mg.mL-1 - Grupo B foram testados em culturas de Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 (do inglês American Type Culture Collection 29213), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 e Candida albicans ATCC 10231. As culturas de S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 e Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 foram semeadas em placas de ágar Mueller Hinton (Oxoid, Reino Unido), e a cultura de Candida albicans ATCC 10231 foi realizada em placa de ágar Sabouraud dextrose (Oxoid, Reino Unido) durante 18-24 horas a 37 °C. Principais resultados: Com relação ao diâmetro da zona de inibição, os valores de S. aureus ATCC 29213, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 e C. albicans ATCC10231 obtidos após 12 e 24 horas de incubação foram significantemente maiores no Grupo F do que no Grupo B (p < 0,001). Os valores do diâmetro da zona de inibição das culturas de E. coli ATCC 25922 e K. pneumomiae ATCC 13883 obtidos após 12 e 24 horas de incubação foram significantemente maiores no Grupo B do que no Grupo F (p < 0,001, E. coli na 12ª hora p = 0,005) Conclusões: A preferência atual e frequente pela adição de fentanil aos Anestésicos Locais (AL) para a realização de anestesia regional se deve sobretudo à possibilidade de redução da dose do anestésico local, a melhora na qualidade da analgesia e a satisfação do paciente. No entanto, ao considerar estudos em que o fentanil antagonizou o efeito antimicrobiano dos AL, pode-se pensar que esse fato contribua para aumento de complicação infecciosa. O citrato de fentanil usado em nosso estudo, contendo ácido clorídrico e hidróxido de sódio como agentes conservantes, ampliou o espectro de efeitos antimicrobianos dos AL, não teve efeito antagônico e demonstrou efeito antimicrobiano sinérgico contra a E. coli. Acreditamos que a adição de fentanil aos anestésicos locais traria importante contribuição na prevenção das crescentes complicações por infecção da anestesia regional.
Subject(s)
Bupivacaine/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Sodium Hydroxide/pharmacology , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Drug Synergism , Hydrochloric Acid/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosageABSTRACT
SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: Opioids interact with both innate and adaptive immune systems and have direct effects on opioid receptors located on immune cells. Research on this topic has provided evidence of the opioid influence on the immune response associated with surgical stress. The immunological effects of opioids are currently being investigated, particularly whether they influence the outcome of surgery or the underlying disease regarding important aspects like infection or cancer progression. This review addresses background research related to the influence of the opioid receptor on the immune system, the immunosuppressive effect associated with major opioids during the perioperative period, and their clinical relevance. The objective of the study was to review the effects of opioids on the immune system. Methods: A search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases using the terms "immunosuppression," "immune system," "surgical procedures," "analgesics," "opioids" and "perioperative care." Results: The immunosuppressive effect of opioids was identified over 30 years ago. They include signaling and acting directly through immune cells, including B and T lymphocytes, NK cells, monocytes, and macrophages, as well as activating the downstream pathways of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis leading to the production of immunosuppressive glucocorticoids in the peripheral and sympathetic nervous system.
RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: Os opioides interagem com ambos os sistemas imunes, inato e adaptativo, através de efeitos diretos sobre os receptores dos opioides localizados nas células imunes. As pesquisas neste assunto têm fornecido evidência da influência dos opioides sobre a resposta imune associada ao estresse cirúrgico. Os efeitos imunológicos dos opioides estão sendo pesquisados na atualidade, principalmente se eles determinam o resultado da cirurgia ou doença consequente devido a fatos importantes como infecção ou progressão do câncer. Essa revisão tem como alvo ver antecedentes em pesquisa relativa à influência dos receptores dos opioides no sistema imunológico, o efeito imunossupressor associado com opioides maiores durante o período peri-operatório e sua importância clínica. O objectivo da pesquisa foi revisar os efeitos dos opioides no sistema imunológico. MÉTODOS: Uma estrategia de procura foi dirigida na mídia PubMed, e no cadastro de Embase e The Cochrane, usando os termos "imunosuppressão", "sistema imunológico", "procedimentos cirúrgicos", "analgésicos", "opioides" e "cuidado peri-operatório". RESULTADOS: O efeito imunosuppressor dos opioides foi identificado há mais de 30 anos. Os efeitos imunosupressores incluem sinalização e ação diretamente através das células imunes, mesmo com os linfócitos B e T, células NK, monócitos e macrófagos, também como ativando as vias de corrente do eixo hipotálamo- hipófise- adrenal (HPA) levando à produção de glucocorticoides imunossupresores no sistema nervoso periférico e simpático.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Immune System/drug effects , Tramadol/administration & dosage , Tramadol/pharmacology , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Adaptive Immunity/drug effects , Perioperative Period , Remifentanil/administration & dosage , Remifentanil/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/pharmacologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The capacity of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) to phagocyte microorganisms is an important function to be preserved during surgical interventions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of propofol, fentanyl and remifentanil combination on Candida albicans engulfment by human PMN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients scheduled to undergo surgical interventions (ASA I-II) received propofol, fentanyl and remifentanil as intravenous anesthesia. PMNs were obtained before and after the surgical procedure and phagocytosis assay was performed using opsonized C. albicans. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: No differences between the values obtained before and after anesthesia treatment in the number of phagocytic PMN and the number of C. albicans engulfed were observed. These results suggest that the used anesthesic protocol does not alter one of the most important immune mechanisms.
OBJETIVOS: La capacidad de las células polimorfonucleares (CPN) de fagocitar a los microorganismos es una importante función que se debe de preservar durante las intervenciones quirúrgicas. Por lo tanto, el propósito de este estudio fue determinar el efecto de la combinación del propofol, el fentanil y el remifentanil en la ingestión de Candida albicans por parte de las CPN humanas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Veinte pacientes sujetos a intervenciones quirúrgicas (ASA I-II) recibieron propofol, fentanil y remifentanil como anestesia endovenosa. Los CPN se obtuvieron antes y después del procedimiento quirúrgico y el ensayo de fagocitosis fue realizando usando C. albicans opsonizada. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: No se observaron diferencias significativas en los valores obtenidos antes y después del tratamiento anestésico tanto en el número de CPN fagocíticas como en el número de C. albicans dentro de las células. Estos hallazgos sugieren que el protocolo anestésico usado no altera uno de los mecanismos de defensa más importante del organismo.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Candida albicans/immunology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Phagocytosis/drug effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Propofol/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Remifentanil , NeutrophilsABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción. Las interacciones farmacológicas ocurren con mayor frecuencia en las unidades de cuidados intensivos que en otros servicios. Sin embargo, en Colombia son pocos los estudios en que se han evaluado en pacientes críticamente enfermos. Objetivos. Caracterizar las potenciales interacciones farmacológicas en las prescripciones de pacientes hospitalizados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos y determinar los factores asociados con su aparición. Materiales y métodos. Se analizó una cohorte retrospectiva de pacientes hospitalizados en una unidad de cuidados intensivos, durante un periodo de siete meses. Las prescripciones diarias se evaluaron en busca de potenciales interacciones farmacológicas mediante el programa Lexicomp™. Se calculó la incidencia de interacciones, se clasificaron según su tipo, gravedad y grado de documentación, y se evaluaron los factores asociados con su aparición mediante regresión logística. Resultados. La proporción de pacientes con por lo menos una interacción fue de 84 %, en tanto que el 87 % presentó más de una interacción; la mediana fue de seis interacciones por paciente. La más frecuente fue entre el fentanilo y el midazolam (23 %). Las interacciones de gravedad y grado de documentación moderados fueron las más frecuentes (77,6 y 52,6 %, respectivamente). El fármaco índice más frecuente fue el midazolam (12 %) y el precipitante más frecuente, el fentanilo (10,6 %). La edad (odds ratio, OR=3,1) y el número de medicamentos (OR=11,8), se asociaron con la aparición de interacciones. Conclusiones. Dada su elevada frecuencia y potencial impacto negativo es importante vigilar sistemáticamente las prescripciones en cuidados intensivos para detectar las interacciones, con el fin de contribuir al uso racional de los medicamentos y a mejorar la calidad de la atención.
Abstract Introduction: Drug-drug interactions occur more frequently in intensive care units than in other services. However, in Colombia, there are few studies on this problem in critically ill patients. Objectives: To characterize potential drug-drug interactions generated from prescriptions during hospitalization in an intensive care unit and to determine factors associated with their onset. Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort was assembled with patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit for a seven-month period. The daily prescription was assessed for potential drugdrug interactions using the Lexicomp® program. We calculated the incidence of interactions, classified them by type, severity, and level of documentation, and evaluated the factors associated with their onset using logistic regression. Results: The proportion of patients with at least one interaction was 84% while 87% had more than one interaction; the median was six interactions per patient. The most frequent was fentanyl and midazolam (23%). Moderate interactions were the most frequent by severity (77.6%) and by documentation (52.6%). The most common index and precipitating drugs were midazolam (12%) and fentanyl (10.6%), respectively. Age (OR=3.1) and the number of drugs (OR=11.8) were associated with the occurrence of interactions. Conclusions: Given their high frequency and potential negative impact, the systematic monitoring of prescriptions in intensive care units to detect interactions is important. Such monitoring contributes to the rational use of medicines and to improve the quality of care.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Drug Interactions , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Potassium Chloride/adverse effects , Potassium Chloride/pharmacology , Midazolam/adverse effects , Midazolam/pharmacology , Fentanyl/adverse effects , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Colombia , Enoxaparin/adverse effects , Enoxaparin/pharmacology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated when undergoing examination, although the best combination of drugs has not been determined. The combination of opioids and benzodiazepines is used to relieve the patient's pain and discomfort. More recently, propofol has assumed a prominent position. This randomized prospective study is unique in medical literature that specifically compared the use of propofol and fentanyl with or without midazolam for colonoscopy sedation performed by anesthesiologists. The aim of this study was to evaluate the side effects of sedation, discharge conditions, quality of sedation, and propofol consumption during colonoscopy, with or without midazolam as preanesthetic. The study involved 140 patients who underwent colonoscopy at the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received intravenous midazolam as preanesthetic 5 min before sedation, followed by fentanyl and propofol; Group II received intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol. Patients in Group II had a higher incidence of reaction (motor or verbal) to the colonoscope introduction, bradycardia, hypotension, and increased propofol consumption. Patient satisfaction was higher in Group I. According to the methodology used, the combination of midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol for colonoscopy sedation reduces propofol consumption and provides greater patient satisfaction.
RESUMO A colonoscopia é um dos procedimentos mais feitos. Sedação e analgesia diminuem a ansiedade e o desconforto e minimizam riscos. Em razão disso, os pacientes preferem que o exame seja feito sob anestesia, embora não tenha sido determinada a melhor combinação de fármacos. A associação de benzodiazepínicos com opioides é usada para aliviar a dor e o desconforto do paciente. Mais recentemente, o propofol assumiu posição de destaque. Este estudo, prospectivo e randomizado, é único na literatura médica e especificamente comparou o uso do propofol e fentanil associado ou não ao midazolam na sedação para colonoscopia feita por anestesiologistas. Os objetivos do estudo foram avaliar os efeitos colaterais da sedação, as condições de alta, a qualidade da sedação e o consumo de propofol durante a colonoscopia, com ou sem o midazolam como pré-anestésico. Envolveu 140 pacientes submetidos à colonoscopia, no Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos. O Grupo I recebeu, por via endovenosa, midazolam como pré-anestésico, cinco minutos antes da sedação, seguido do fentanil e propofol. O Grupo II recebeu, por via endovenosa, anestesia com fentanil e propofol. Os pacientes do Grupo II apresentaram maior incidência de reação (motora ou verbal) à introdução do colonoscópio, bradicardia, hipotensão arterial e maior consumo de propofol. A satisfação dos pacientes foi maior no Grupo I. De acordo com a metodologia empregada, a associação de midazolam ao propofol e fentanil para sedação em colonoscopia reduz o consumo de propofol e cursa com maior satisfação do paciente.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Midazolam/pharmacology , Propofol/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Colonoscopy , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Pain/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Background and objectives: Laryngoscopy and intubation can cause hemodynamic response. Various medications may be employed to control that response. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on hemodynamic response. Methods: Ninety elective surgery patients who needed endotracheal intubation who were in American Society of Anesthesiology I–II group and ages between 21 and 65 years were included in that prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures, heart rates at the time of admittance at operation room were recorded as basal measurements. The patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 30) received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with infusion in 10 min, Group II (n = 30) received 2 μg/kg fentanyl, Group III received 2 mg/kg esmolol 2 min before induction. The patients were intubated in 3 min. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures and heart rates were measured before induction, before intubation and 1, 3, 5, 10 min after intubation. Results: When basal levels were compared with the measurements of the groups, it was found that 5 and 10 min after intubation heart rate in Group I and systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures in Group III were lower than other measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine was superior in the prevention of tachycardia. Esmolol prevented sytolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure increases following intubation. We concluded that further studies are needed in order to find a strategy that prevents the increase in systemic blood pressure and heart rate both. .
Justificativa e objetivos: Laringoscopia e intubação podem causar resposta hemodinâmica. Vários medicamentos podem ser usados para controlar essa resposta. Neste estudo, nosso objetivo foi comparar os efeitos de dexmedetomidina, fentanil e esmolol sobre a resposta hemodinâmica. Métodos: Foram incluídos no estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego 90 pacientes programados para cirurgias eletivas, com intubação endotraqueal, estado físico ASA I-II, entre 21 e 65 anos. Pressões arteriais médias, sistólicas, diastólicas e frequências cardíacas foram medidas ao darem entrada na sala de operações e registradas como valores basais. Os pacientes foram randomizados em três grupos: Grupo I (n = 30) recebeu 1 μg/kg de dexmedetomidina com infusão em 10 min; Grupo II (n = 30) recebeu 2 μg/kg de fentanil; Grupo III (n = 30) recebeu 2 mg/kg de esmolol 2 min antes da indução. Os pacientes foram intubados em 3 min. As pressões médias, sistólicas e diastólicas e as frequências cardíacas foram medidas antes da indução, antes da intubação e nos minutos 1, 3, 5 e 10 após a intubação. Resultados: Quando os níveis basais foram comparados entre os grupos, verificou-se que nos minutos 5 e 10 pós-intubação as frequências cardíacas no Grupo I e as pressões arteriais médias, sistólicas e diastólicas no Grupo III estavam mais baixas do que em outros tempos mensurados (p <0,05 ). Conclusões: Dexmedetomidina foi superior na prevenção de taquicardia. Esmolol preveniu o aumento das pressões arteriais médias, sistólicas e diastólicas após a intubação. Concluímos que estudos adicionais são necessários para descobrir uma estratégia que previna tanto o aumento ...
Justificación y objetivos: La laringoscopia y la intubación pueden causar una respuesta hemodinámica. Varios medicamentos pueden ser usados para controlar esa respuesta. En este estudio, nuestro objetivo fue comparar los efectos de la dexmedetomidina, el fentanilo y el esmolol sobre la respuesta hemodinámica. Métodos: Noventa pacientes programados para cirugías electivas con intubación endotraqueal, estado físico ASA I-II, y edades entre 21 y 65 años, se incluyeron en el estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado y doble ciego. Las presiones arteriales medias, sistólicas, diastólicas y las frecuencias cardíacas se midieron cuando los pacientes llegaron al quirófano y se registraron como valores basales. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 3 grupos: el grupo i (n = 30) recibió 1 μg/kg de dexmedetomidina con infusión en 10 min; el grupo ii (n = 30) recibió 2 μg/kg de fentanilo; el grupo iii recibió 2 mg/kg de esmolol 2 min antes de la inducción. Los pacientes fueron intubados en 3 min. Las presiones medias, sistólicas y diastólicas y las frecuencias cardíacas fueron medidas antes de la inducción, antes de la intubación y durante los minutos 1, 3, 5 y 10 después de la intubación. Resultados: Cuando los niveles basales fueron comparados entre los grupos, verificamos que en los minutos 5 y 10 la postintubación, las frecuencias cardíacas en el grupo i y las presiones arteriales medias, sistólicas y diastólicas en el grupo iii eran más bajas que en otros tiempos medidos (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: La dexmedetomidina fue superior en la prevención de la taquicardia. El esmolol previno el aumento de las presiones arteriales medias, sistólicas y diastólicas después de la intubación. Concluimos que son necesarios algunos estudios adicionales para descubrir una estrategia ...
Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Neurovascular Coupling/drug effects , Intubation/instrumentation , Laryngoscopy/instrumentation , Tachycardia/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
We investigated the effect of propofol and fentanyl on microelectrode recording (MER) and its clinical applicability during subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. We analyzed 8 patients with Parkinson's disease, underwent bilateral STN DBS with MER. Their left sides were done under awake and then their right sides were done with a continuous infusion of propofol and fentanyl under local anesthesia. The electrode position was evaluated by preoperative MRI and postoperative CT. The clinical outcomes were assessed at six months after surgery. We isolated single unit activities from the left and the right side MERs. There was no significant difference in the mean firing rate between the left side MERs (38.7+/-16.8 spikes/sec, n=78) and the right side MERs (35.5+/-17.2 spikes/sec, n=66). The bursting pattern of spikes was more frequently observed in the right STN than in the left STN. All the electrode positions were within the STNs on both sides and the off-time Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III scores at six months after surgery decreased by 67% of the preoperative level. In this study, a continuous infusion of propofol and fentanyl did not significantly interfere with the MER signals from the STN. The results of this study suggest that propofol and fentanyl can be used for STN DBS in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease improving the overall experience of the patients.
Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Deep Brain Stimulation , Electrodes, Implanted , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Microelectrodes , Parkinson Disease/prevention & control , Propofol/pharmacology , Severity of Illness Index , Subthalamic Nucleus/drug effects , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Investigar o efeito de esmolol, lidocaína e fentanil na dispersão da onda P (DP), durações dos intervalos QT e QT corrigido (QTc) e as respostas hemodinâmicas à intubação endotraqueal durante a indução com propofol. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos 80 pacientes adultos, estado físico ASA I ou II, idade entre 18 e 60 anos, neste estudo prospectivo, randômico e duplo-cego. Todos os pacientes foram submetidos a exame eletrocardiográfico (ECG) antes da indução da anestesia. Os pacientes foram randomicamente alocados em quatro grupos iguais. O grupo controle (Grupo C) recebeu 5 mL de solução salina; o grupo esmolol (Grupo E) recebeu 0,5 mg.kg-1 de esmolol; o grupo fentanil (Grupo F) recebeu 2 µg.kg-1 de fentanil e o grupo lidocaína (Grupo L) recebeu 1,5 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína antes da indução anestésica. A anestesia foi induzida com propofol. ECG foi feito em todos os pacientes durante o primeiro e o terceiro minutos de indução, 3 minutos após a administração de relaxante muscular e 5 e 10 minutos após intubação. A DP e intervalos QT foram medidos em todos os ECGs. Os intervalos QTc foram determinados com o uso da fórmula de Bazett. Frequência cardíaca (FC) e pressão arterial média (PAM) foram registradas antes e depois da indução anestésica, imediatamente após a intubação e em 1, 3, 5, 7 e 10 minutos após a intubação. RESULTADOS: Após a intubação, a FC aumentou significativamente nos Grupos C, L e F em comparação com o grupo controle. Porém, não houve diferença significativa nos valores da FC após a intubação entre os grupos E e controle. Nos Grupos C e L, a PAM aumentou significativamente após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. No entanto, nos Grupos L, F e E não houve diferença significativa entre os valores da PAM após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. A DP foi significativamente mais longa no Grupo C após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. Porém, nos grupos L, F e E não houve diferença significativa entre os valores de DP após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. A duração do intervalo QTc foi significativamente maior nos grupos C e L após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. Porém, não houve diferença significativa na duração do QTc nos grupos F e E após a intubação em comparação com o grupo controle. CONCLUSÃO: Concluímos que a administração de esmolol antes da intubação previne a taquicardia, o aumento da PAM e as durações da onda P e intervalo QTc causados pela laringoscopia e intubação traqueal.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In our study we aimed to investigate the effect of esmolol, lidocaine and fentanyl on P-wave dispersion (Pwd), QT and corrected QT (QTc) durations and hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation during propofol induction. METHODS: A total of eighty adult patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II aged 18 to 60 years were included in this prospective, randomised, double-blind study. All patients had control electrocardiograms (ECGs) done before anesthesia induction. The patients were randomised into four equal groups. The control group (Group C) received saline 5 mL, the esmolol group (Group E) received esmolol 0.5 mg.kg-1, the fentanyl group (Group F) received fentanyl 2 µg.kg-1 and the lidocaine group (Group L) received lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg-1 before anesthesia induction. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol. ECGs for all patients were performed during the 1st and 3rd minutes of induction, 3 minutes after administration of muscle relaxant, and at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after intubation. Pwd and QT intervals were measured on all ECGs. QTc intervals were determined using the Bazett formula. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded before and after induction of anesthesia, immediately after intubation, and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10 minutes after intubation. RESULTS: Compared with control, HR significantly increased in Group C, Group L and Group F after intubation. However, in Group E, there was no significant difference in HR values between control and after intubation. Compared with control, MAP significantly increased in Group C and Group L after the intubation. However, in Group E and Group F, there was no significant difference in MAP values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, Pwd significantly increased in Group C after intubation. In Group L, Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in Pwd values between control and after the intubation. Compared with control, QTc duration significantly increased in Group C and L after the intubation. In Group F and Group E, there was no significant difference in QTc durations between control and after the intubation. CONCLUSION: We concluded that administration of esmolol before intubation prevents tachycardia and an increase in MAP, Pwd and QTc duration caused by laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Investigar el efecto del esmolol, lidocaína y fentanilo en la dispersión de la onda P (DOP), duraciones de los intervalos QT y QT corregido (QTc) y las respuestas hemodinámicas a la intubación endotraqueal durante la inducción con propofol. MÉTODOS: En este estudio prospectivo, aleatorio y doble ciego, fueron incluidos 80 pacientes adultos, con estado físico ASA I o II, y edad entre 18 y 60 años. Todos los pacientes se sometieron al examen electrocardiográfico (ECG) antes de la inducción de la anestesia. Los pacientes fueron aleatoriamente divididos en cuatro grupos iguales. El grupo control (Grupo C) recibió 5 mL de solución salina; el grupo esmolol (Grupo E) recibió 0,5 mg.kg-1 de esmolol; el grupo fentanilo (Grupo F) recibió 2 µg.kg-1 de fentanilo y el grupo lidocaína (Grupo L) recibió 1,5 mg.kg-1 de lidocaína antes de la inducción anestésica. La anestesia fue inducida con propofol. El ECG se hizo en todos los pacientes durante el primero y el tercer minuto de inducción, 3 minutos después de la administración del relajante muscular y 5 y 10 minutos después de la intubación. La DOP y los intervalos QT se midieron en todos los ECGs. Los intervalos QTc fueron determinados con el uso de la fórmula de Bazett. La frecuencia cardíaca (FC) y la presión arterial promedio (PAP) fueron registradas antes y después de la inducción anestésica, inmediatamente después de la intubación y en 1, 3, 5, 7 y 10 minutos después de la intubación. RESULTADOS: Después de la intubación, la FC aumentó significativamente en los Grupos C, L y F en comparación con el grupo control. Sin embargo, no hubo diferencia significativa en los valores de la FC después de la intubación entre los grupos E y control. En los Grupos C y L, la PAP aumentó significativamente después de la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. Sin embargo, en los Grupos L, F y E no hubo diferencia significativa entre los valores de la PAP posteriormente a la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. La DOP fue significativamente más larga en el Grupo C después de la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. No obstante, en los grupos L, F y E no hubo diferencia significativa entre los valores de DOP después de la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. La duración del intervalo QTc fue significativamente mayor en los grupos C y L después de la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. Sin embargo, no hubo diferencia significativa en la duración del QTc en los grupos F y E después de la intubación en comparación con el grupo control. CONCLUSIONES: Llegamos entonces a la conclusión, de que la administración del esmolol antes de la intubación previene la taquicardia, el aumento de la PAP y las duraciones de la onda P e intervalo QTc causados por la laringoscopia y por la intubación traqueal.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Intubation, Intratracheal , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Propanolamines/pharmacology , Propofol/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Avaliou-se a eficiência do cateterismo posterior do plexo braquial em cães para promover bloqueio motor e sensitivo, por meio de três protocolos anestésicos. Foram utilizados nove cães, machos e fêmeas, sem distinção de raça e idade, com peso variando de 6 a 15kg, distribuídos em três grupos de três animais por grupo. Após a confirmação do correto posicionamento do cateter pela via posterior do plexo braquial por meio do exame radiográfico, foram aplicadas as medicações de acordo com os grupos. No grupo 1, a solução anestésica de bupivacaína 0,5% sem vasoconstrictor, na dose de 2mg.kg-1, foi usada isoladamente. No grupo 2, a solução anestésica de bupivacaína foi associada ao butorfanol na dose de 0,25mg.kg-1 . No grupo 3, o fentanil, na dose de 0,005mg.kg¹, foi associado à solução anestésica de bupivacaína. Não houve diferença estatística significante entre os grupos. Observou-se que a duração dos bloqueios motor e sensitivo foi clinicamente maior no grupo 2. O cateterismo posterior do plexo braquial permite a aplicação de fármacos mais próximos do plexo nervoso, promovendo analgesia complementar nos membros anteriores.
We evaluated the efficiency of the posterior brachial plexus catheterization in dogs to promote motor and sensory block using three anesthetic protocols. We used nine dogs, males and females, without distinction of race and age, weighing 6 to 15kg which were divided into three groups of three animals per group. After confirming the correct positioning of the catheter through the posterior brachial plexus through radiographic examination, the medications were administered according to the groups. In group 1 the anesthetic bupivacaine 0.5% without a vasoconstrictor dose of 2mg.kg-1 was used alone. In group 2 the anesthetic bupivacaine was associated with butorphanol at a dose of 0.25mg.kg-1. In group 3, the fentanyl dose was associated with 0.005mg.kg-1 anesthetic bupivacaine. There was no statistically significant difference between groups. It was observed that the duration of sensory and motor block was clinically higher in group 2. The posterior brachial plexus catheterization allows the application of drugs closer to the nerve plexus promoting additional analgesia in the forelimbs.
Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Anesthesia , Butorphanol/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Radiology/methods , Catheterization , DogsABSTRACT
JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Comparar os efeitos de dexmedetomidina e fentanil sobre as alterações hemodinâmicas em fumantes crônicos do sexo masculino. MÉTODOS: Este é um estudo prospectivo, randômico e cego. Sessenta pacientes do sexo masculino, tabagistas crônicos, com idades entre 16 e 60 anos foram selecionados. Os pacientes foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos: Grupo D (n = 30) recebeu 1 µg.kg-1 de dexmedetomidina e Grupo F (n = 30) recebeu 3 µg.kg-1 de fentanil em 150 mL de solução salina normal, com início 10 minutos antes da indução da anestesia. Antes da intubação, a frequência cardíaca e a pressão arterial dos pacientes foram medidas. Após a indução da anestesia para intubação endotraqueal, a frequência cardíaca e os valores da pressão arterial foram novamente medidos 1, 3 e 5 minutos após a intubação. RESULTADOS: A frequência cardíaca estava baixa no Grupo D antes da indução da anestesia, intubação e no primeiro e terceiro minutos pósintubação. A pressão arterial sistólica estava baixa no Grupo F antes da intubação. Embora a pressão arterial diastólica estivesse menor antes da indução da anestesia e aos 5 minutos após a intubação em ambos os grupos, ela já estava baixa no Grupo F antes mesmo da intubação. Enquanto a pressão arterial média estava baixa no Grupo D antes da indução anestésica, ela estava baixa no Grupo F antes da intubação. Os valores para o duplo produto (frequência cardíaca vezes pressão arterial sistólica) estavam baixos no Grupo D antes da indução e no 1º e 3º minutos após a intubação. CONCLUSÕES: A dexmedetomidina, aplicada em fumantes crônicos do sexo masculino via infusão a uma dose de 1 µg.kg-1 10 minutos antes de indução anestésica, controla melhor as elevações da frequência cardíaca e do duplo produto a 1 e 3 minutos após a intubação, comparado ao grupo que recebeu 3 µg.kg-1 de fentanil.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on hemodynamic changes in chronic male smokers. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, blinded study. Were selected 60 chronic male smokers (aged 16 to 60 years). The patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group D (n = 30) received 1 µg.kg-1 dexmedetomidine and Group F (n = 30) received 3 µg.kg-1 fentanyl in 150 mL of normal saline, beginning 10 minutes before anesthesia induction. Before intubation, the heart rate and blood pressure of patients were measured. After anesthesia induction for endotracheal intubation, heart rate and blood pressure values were measured at 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation. RESULTS: Heart rate was low in Group D before anesthesia induction, intubation, and at the 1st and 3rd minutes after intubation. Systolic arterial pressure was low in Group F before intubation. Although diastolic arterial pressure was lower before anesthesia induction and at 5 minutes after intubation in both groups, it was already low in Group F before intubation. Whereas the mean arterial pressure was low in Group D before anesthesia induction, it was low in Group F before intubation. The values for rate-pressure product were low in Group D before induction and at 1 and 3 minutes after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine, which was applied via infusion at a loading dose of 1 µg.kg-1 10 minutes before anesthesia induction in chronic male smokers, better suppressed increases in heart rate and rate-pressure product at 1 and 3 minutes after intubation compared to the group receiving 3 µg.kg-1 fentanyl.
JUSTIFICATIVA Y OBJETIVOS: Comparar los efectos de la dexmedetomidina y del fentanil sobre las alteraciones hemodinámicas en fumadores crónicos del sexo masculino. MÉTODOS: Este es un estudio prospectivo, randómico y ciego. Sesenta pacientes del sexo masculino, fumadores crónicos, con edades entre los 16 y los 60 años, fueron seleccionados. Los pacientes fueron divididos aleatoriamente en dos grupos: Grupo D (n = 30) recibió 1 µg.kg-1 de dexmedetomidina o 3 µg.kg-1 de fentanil, y el Grupo F (n = 30) que recibió 150 mL de solución salina normal, con inicio 10 minutos antes de la inducción de la anestesia. Antes de la intubación, se mensuraron la frecuencia cardíaca y la presión arterial de los pacientes. Después de la inducción de la anestesia para la intubación endotraqueal, la frecuencia cardíaca y los valores de la presión arterial fueron medidos uno, tres y cinco minutos después de la intubación. RESULTADOS: La frecuencia cardíaca estaba baja en el Grupo D antes de la inducción de la anestesia, de la intubación y en el primero y tercer minutos posintubación. La presión arterial sistólica estaba baja en el Grupo F antes de la intubación. Aunque la presión arterial diastólica fuese menor antes de la inducción de la anestesia y a los cinco minutos después de la intubación en ambos grupos, ella ya estaba baja en el Grupo F antes incluso de la intubación. Mientras la presión arterial promedio estaba baja en el Grupo D antes de la inducción anestésica, estaba baja también en el Grupo F antes de la intubación. Los valores para el doble producto (frecuencia cardíaca por la presión arterial sistólica), eran bajos en el Grupo D antes de la inducción y en el 1º y 3º minutos después de la intubación. CONCLUSIONES: Descubrimos pues, que la dexmedetomidina, que fue aplicada en fumadores crónicos del sexo masculino vía infusión a una dosis de 1 µg.kg-1 10 minutos antes de la inducción anestésica, controla mejor las elevaciones de la frecuencia cardíaca y del doble producto a uno y tres minutos después de la intubación, comparado al grupo que recibió 3 µg.kg-1 de fentanil.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Heart Rate/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Intubation, Intratracheal , Smoking , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind MethodABSTRACT
Postanesthesia shivering is an undesirable event that may induce a variety of adverse consequences including patient discomfort, increased oxygen consumption and wound pain. Thus, its pharmacological treatment should be regarded. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of morphine, fentanyl and pethidine for the treatment of postanesthesia shivering. Fifty patients who developed shivering were treated in a randomized double blinded manner with an intravenous bolus dose of 2 or 4 mg morphine, 25 or 50 mg pethidine, and 50 microg fentanyl. Then, they were monitored for 30 minutes and the shivering suppression grade, the time taken to stop shivering, the shivering cessation time, recurrence of shivering and opioid side effects were evaluated. Core body temperature was measured immediately before, and at 15 and 30 minute after administering the drug. The groups did not differ significantly regarding shivering suppression grade, shivering cessation time, and recurrence of shivering. There was a significant difference in the time taken to stop shivering between groups. Following injection of the drugs, the core temperatures increased in the five groups with statistical difference. All opioids were effective in treating postanesthesia shivering in a similar extent
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Morphine/pharmacology , Meperidine/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Body Temperature/drug effects , Double-Blind Method , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
To compare the effectiveness of single bolus dose of esmolol or fentanyl in attenuating the hemodynamic responses during laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Ninety adult ASA I and ASA II patients were included in the study who underwent elective surgical procedures. Patients were divided into three groups. Group C [control] receiving 10 ml normal saline, group E [esmolol] receiving bolus dose of esmolol 2 mg/kg and group F [fentanyl] receiving bolus dose of fentanyl 2microg/kg intravenously slowly. Study drug was injected 3 min before induction of anesthesia. Heart rate, systemic arterial pressure and ECG were recorded as baseline and after administration of study drug at intubation and 15 min thereafter. Reading of heart rate, blood pressure and rate pressure product were compared with baseline and among each group. The rise in heart rate was minimal in esmolol group and was highly significant. Also the rate pressure product at the time of intubation was minimal and was statistically significant rate 15 min thereafter in group E. Esmolol 2 mg/kg as a bolus done proved to be effective in attenuating rises in heart rate following laryngoscopy and intubation while the rise in blood pressure was suppressed but not abolished by bolus dose of esmolol
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Heart Rate/drug effects , Laryngoscopy , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Propanolamines/pharmacology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Anesthetics, Intravenous , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Detection of morphine, fentanyl, and tramadol in human hair and in hair, bone and bone marrow of rats was done using high pressure liquid chromatography [HPKC]. Forty participants were divided into 4 groups control, morphine, tramadol, and fentanyl group. Hair samples were taken after 7 days of exposure to the tested drugs. The animal pat of the experiment consisted of 80 rats. The first 40 rats were divided into 4 subgroups [10 rats each]. The first subgroup was injected with saline IP as a control group, the second subgroup was injected with morphine 20mg/kg SC. The 3[rd] subgroup was injected with fentanyl 60micro g/kg IP and the 4[th] one was injected with tramadol 20mg/kg IP. Hair specimens were collected ten days after injection. The other forty rats were divided into 4 subgroups treated with the same drug doses of the first 40 rats, but morphine and tramadol groups were scarificed after 1 hour and fentanyl group was scarificed after 20 minutes. Femora diaphysis and bone marrow were collected from each sacrificed rat and frozen. After extraction; HPLC was used to evaluate if these drugs could be detected in these tissues after exposure to single therapeutic doses or not. Results showed that all control groups gave negative results. Morphine, fentanyl and tramadol were detected in human hair at levels 20-123pg/mg, 0.6-1.3 and 1.23-4.23 ng/mg respectively. In rats; morphine was detected at level 0.03-0.53, 4.39-12.31 and 9.31-31.20 ng/mg in hair, bone and bone marrow of rats respectively. Fentanyl was detected at level 1.9-6.20, 5.35-22.36 and 18.22-53.49 ng/mg while tramadol was detected at level 1.27-3.92, 9.6-21.6, and 22.62 to 51.31 ng/mg in hair, bone and bone marrow respectively. This study confirmed that morphine, fentanyl and tramadol are detectable even after single use in hair, bone and bone marrow
Subject(s)
Humans , Animals, Laboratory , Morphine/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Tramadol/pharmacology , Drug Monitoring , Bone and Bones , Bone Marrow , Hair , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Humans , RatsABSTRACT
To study the effects of sufentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure after easy and difficult intubations. From January 2006 to January 2008 there were included 120 patients undergoing general anesthesia at University Hospital Center [Mother Theresa] Service of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Tirana, Albania. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 60 patients each receiving Sufentanil [group S], and Fentanyl [group F], 2 minutes before intubation. Fourteen patients were found to have difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubations [8 in group S. and 6 in group F], in which several attempts to intubate were carried out. We compared the intraocular pressure values before, and 2 minutes after the intubations between the 2 groups, and also between the 2 groups that resulted as difficult intubations. The mean intraocular pressure measured 2 minutes after intubation in group S was lower than in group F. Mean intraocular pressure changes in the 2 groups were: 1.67mm Hg in group S, and -1.77mm Hg in group F. The small groups included patients with difficult intubation; mean intraocular pressure changes were + 1.93 mm Hg in group S, and +3.7 mm Hg in group F. Both drugs blunt the increased intraocular pressure during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubations, but in difficult intubation, sufentanil presented better protection than fentanyl
Subject(s)
Humans , Laryngoscopy , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Sufentanil/pharmacology , Anesthesia, Intravenous/pharmacologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Fentanyl was reported to inhibit the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist-induced contraction. The goal of this in vitro study was to identify the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype primarily involved in the fentanyl-induced attenuation of phenylephrine-induced contraction in isolated endothelium-denuded rat aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic rings were suspended in order to record isometric tension. Concentration-response curves for phenylephrine (10-9 to 10-5 M) were generated in the presence or absence of one of the following drugs: fentanyl (3x10-7, 10-6, 3x10-6 M), 5-methylurapidil (3x10-8, 10-7, 3x10-7 M), chloroethylclonidine (10-5 M) and BMY 7378 (3x10-9, 10-8, 3x10-8 M). Phenylephrine concentration-response curves were generated in the presence or absence of fentanyl in rings pretreated with either 3x10-9 M prazosin, 10-9 M 5-methylurapidil or 3x10-9 M BMY 7378. RESULTS: Fentanyl (10-6, 3x10-6 M) attenuated phenylephrine-induced contraction in the rat aorta. 5-Methylurapidil and BMY 7378 produced a parallel rightward shift in the phenylephrine concentration-response curve. The pA2 values for 5-methylurapidil and BMY 7378 were estimated to be 7.71 +/- 0.15 and 8.99 +/- 0.24, respectively. Fentanyl (10-6 M) attenuated phenylephrine-induced contraction in rings pretreated with 10-9 M 5-methylurapidil, but did not alter the rings when pretreated with 3x10-9 M BMY 7378. Pretreatment of the rings with chloroethylclonidine showed a 72.9 +/- 2.3% reduction in phenylephrine-induced maximal contraction. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that fentanyl attenuates phenylephrine-induced contraction by inhibiting the pathway involved in the alpha1D-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction of the rat aorta.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rats , Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/pharmacology , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/pharmacology , Aorta/drug effects , Clonidine/analogs & derivatives , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Phenylephrine/pharmacology , Piperazines/pharmacology , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Vasoconstriction/drug effectsABSTRACT
To determine the characteristic profiles of 2 hypobaric spinal anesthetic solutions for selective spinal anesthesia in inguinal herniorrhaphy. The study took place in the general surgery room of Anesthesia Department, Ankara Numune Research and Training Hospital between May and July 2005 as a prospective, randomized and double-blind trial. Sixty-one ASA I-III patients scheduled for inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group R received combined spinal epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine 7.5 mg and group B received bupivacaine 5 mg; in both groups 25 micro g of fentanyl was added. Solutions were diluted with 1.5 ml of sterile water. A Portex 18/27 or 16/27 needle was inserted at L1-2 or L2-3 with patients sitting upright; surgery began after the sensory block reached the T6 dermatome. Sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic data, side effects, recovery time, the timing of the onset of pain, and the walkout were assessed. Motor block duration was shorter in Group R [56.1 +/- 36.1 minutes versus 72.5 +/- 23.3 minutes] [p=0.013]. Complete motor block duration was shorter in Group R. There was no difference between the 2 groups. Intra-group analysis showed that hemodynamic values after anesthesia induction were lower than initial values. Ropivacaine plus fentanyl provided similar sensory anesthesia, but with a shorter duration of motor block than bupivacaine plus fentanyl when used for selective spinal anesthesia in herniorrhaphy surgery. Furthermore, we suggest that hemodynamic should be carefully monitored during surgery
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Bupivacaine/pharmacology , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , Prospective Studies , Patient SatisfactionABSTRACT
A anestesia peridural é amplamente difundida no meio veterinário, utilizando-se o anestésico local isolado ou associado aos opióides, capazes de promover aumento do efeito analgésico. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a função cardiorrespiratória e analgésica da ropivacaína isolada ou associada ao fentanil ou tramadol. Para tanto, oito cães foram tranqüilizados com acepromazina, submetidos à anestesia peridural com um dos seguintes protocolos: GR (ropivacaína), GRF (ropivacaína + fentanil), GRT (ropivacaína + tramadol), em volume total de 0,25ml kg-1, e foram avaliados os parâmetros: freqüência cardíaca e respiratória, temperatura retal, pressão arterial sistólica, e gasometria do sangue arterial, os bloqueios sensitivo e motor, o grau de sedação e a ocorrência de possíveis efeitos indesejáveis. A diminuição da freqüência cardíaca nos grupos GRF e GRT foi mais intensa e ocorreu hipotermia significativa no GRF. Foi evidenciada sedação severa em GRF e GRT. O período de recuperação foi mais curto nos animais de GRT. O GRT foi o grupo que apresentou bloqueio mais cranial. Foram observadas bradicardia, hipotermia e síndrome de Shiff-Sherrington no período trans-anestésico em animais de todos os grupos. Nas 24 horas de período pós-anestésico, não foram evidenciados efeitos indesejáveis nos grupos. O GRF apresentou maior duração de anestesia e analgesia, enquanto que o GRT apresentou a menor duração de anestesia com analgesia intermediária e o GR apresentou duração intermediária, com menor analgesia. Não foram encontradas alterações respiratórias e hemogasométricas, porém, bradicardia, hipotermia e síndrome de Schiff-Sherrington, alterações trans-anestésicas comuns na anestesia peridural foram encontradas.
Peridural anesthesia is broadly applied in the Veterinary field, using the isolated local anesthetic or in combination with opiates capable to increase the analgesic effect. This research compared analgesia and cardiorespiratory effects of epidural anaesthesia produced by ropivacaine alone or combined with fentanyl or tramadol in eight mixed breed adult dogs after sedation with acepromazina. Drugs were administered on the following protocols: GR (ropivacaine), GRF (ropivacaine + fentanyl), GRT (ropivacaine + tramadol), in 0.25ml kg-1 of total volume. Heart and respiratory rate, rectal temperature, blood pressure and, gasometry of atrial blood were mensured, as well the sensory and motor blockade (latency and period of action), degree of sedation and side effects. The most important decrease of the heart rate occurred in GRF and GRT. Also significant hypothermia in GRF. Intense degree of sedation was observed in GRF and GRT. The period of recovery was shorter in GRT. The most cranial region of blockade occurred in GRT. Bradicardia, hypothermia and Shiff-Sherrington syndrom were observed in the transanesthetic period in animal from all of the groups. During 24 hours after the anaesthesia no side effects were observed. The GRF had the longer period of anesthesia and analgesia, GRT presented the shorter period of anesthesia with intermediate analgesia and, GR presented intermediate period of anesthesia with lower degree of analgesia. Respiratory and hemogasometrics change were not found, but hipotermy, bradicardy and Schiff-Sherrington syndrome, side effects usually seen in peridural anesthesia, were observed in this study.
Subject(s)
Animals , Dogs , Analgesia, Epidural/veterinary , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Fentanyl/pharmacology , Cardiovascular System , Tramadol/pharmacologyABSTRACT
To compare the effects of epidural and intravenous fentanyl on breast feeding behaviors and fentanyl concentration in the colostrum after an analgesic dose. This study was conducted at the Obstetrics Department of Kasr El-Aini Hospital-Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. The studied mothers were 100 multipara, who have been subjected to cesarean section, and have a previous history of successful breast feeding. The study was conducted from May 2005 to May 2007. They were divided into 2 groups: group I included 50 patients who received epidural anesthesia with fentanyl, and group II included 50 patients who received spinal anesthesia with intravenous fentanyl, and both groups were observed for initial breast feeding behaviors of newborns, and fentanyl concentration in the colostrum at 45 minutes, and 24 hours after birth. The study included 100 multipara, 2 samples of colostrum were taken from each patients at 45 minutes, and at 24 hours. The levels of fentanyl concentration were greatest at 45 minutes of the initial sampling time, reaching 0.40 +/- 0.059 ng/ml in the epidural group, and 0.19 +/- 0.019 ng/ml in intravenous fentanyl group. There was no statistical difference in breast feeding behaviors at birth, or at 24 hours of age in both groups. Although the levels of fentanyl concentration were greatest at 45 minutes of the initial sampling time, it can be used safely as intravenous or epidural without affecting the initial breast feeding behaviors of the newborn