ABSTRACT
Antecedentes: El departamento del Cauca en Colombia es multiétnico, multicultural y biodiverso, también con grandes diferencias en bajo peso al nacer (BPN), mortalidad perinatal y mortalidad neonatal tardía entre municipios. Objetivo: Determinar la relación de costo-efectividad del control prenatal (CPN) cuando ha tenido buena calidad frente al que ha tenido calidad deficiente con respecto al BPN en el departamento del Cauca entre 2018 y 2020. Método: Evaluación económica con diseño epidemiológico de una cohorte histórica desde la perspectiva de la institución pagadora. Se calculó la razón incremental de costo-efectividad (RICE), análisis de sensibilidad e impacto presupuestal. Resultados: La incidencia de BPN fue del 8,3% (348/4182). La calidad deficiente en el CPN incrementó el riesgo de BPN (OR: 3,38; IC95%: 1,05-8,2) y la buena calidad tuvo una mejor relación de costo-efectividad (RICE: USD 2727,75), con posición dominante frente a la calidad deficiente (6,14 veces el PIB per cápita de ahorro) y con un impacto presupuestal de USD 2.904.392. Conclusiones: La buena calidad del CPN en el departamento del Cauca durante 2018-2020 fue costo-efectiva y dominante por ser de menor costo y mayor efectividad.
Background: The department of Cauca in Colombia is multiethnic, multicultural, and biodiverse, also with large differences in low birth weight (LBW), perinatal mortality, and late neonatal mortality among municipalities. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness relationship of antenatal care (ANC) when it has had good quality compared to that which has had poor quality with respect to low birth weight in the department of Cauca between 2018 and 2019. Method: Economic evaluation with epidemiological cohort design historical from the perspective of the payer institution. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE), sensitivity analysis, and budgetary impact were calculated. Results: The incidence of LBW was 8.3% (348/4182). Poor quality in ANC increased the risk of LBW (OR: 3.38; CI95%: 1.05-8.2), good quality had a better cost-effectiveness ratio (RICE: USD 2727.75), with dominant position against poor quality (6.14 times the GDP/capita savings) with a budgetary impact of USD 2,904,392. Conclusions: The good quality of the ANC in the department of Cauca during 2018-2020 was cost-effective and dominant because it is lower cost and more effective.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Prenatal Care/economics , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Retrospective Studies , Health Care Costs , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
Introduction: Despite penicillin being the drug of choice for the treatment of syphilis, many pregnant women who test positive for syphilis do not receive the drug as recommended by the Ministry of Health, contributing to the increase in costs associated with congenital syphilis. Objective: This study aims to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of administering at least one dose of 2.4 million IU of benzathine penicillin in the first trimester of pregnancy as soon as the result of a positive rapid treponemal test performed during antenatal care in primary care units of the Brazilian National Health System. Methods: An analytical model was proposed based on a decision tree. The perspective of the analysis was the one used in The Brazilian National Health System. The clinical outcomes were abortion, prematurity, neonatal death, stillbirth, and congenital syphilis, estimated in terms of disability-adjusted life-years. Only direct costs were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The model predicted that the most efficient strategy is the one that includes the administration of penicillin in primary care for cases of gestational syphilis. This strategy is more effective, although more costly. The cost per disability-adjusted life-years averted with the use of this strategy was estimated at R$49.79 (US$ 10.67). Conclusion: The prenatal strategy in primary care units that includes the administration of penicillin to pregnant women with syphilis during the first trimester of pregnancy has the greatest potential to be cost-effective.
Introdução: A despeito de a penicilina ser o medicamento de escolha para o tratamento da sífilis, muitas gestantes com teste positivo para sífilis não recebem o medicamento como recomendado pelo Ministério da Saúde, concorrendo para o aumento dos custos associados à sífilis congênita. Objetivo: Estimar a razão de custo-efetividade incremental da administração de pelo menos uma dose de 2,4 milhões de Unidades Internacionais de penicilina benzatina no primeiro trimestre de gravidez, tão logo se tenha o resultado de um teste rápido treponêmico positivo realizado na consulta pré-natal em unidades de atenção primária do Sistema Único de Saúde. Métodos: Um modelo analítico foi proposto a partir de uma árvore de decisão. A perspectiva da análise foi a do Sistema Único de Saúde. Os desfechos em saúde foram aborto, prematuridade, morte neonatal, natimorto e sífilis congênita, estimados em termos de anos de vida ajustados a incapacidades (disability-adjusted life-years). Apenas os custos diretos foram considerados. Análises de sensibilidade determinística e probabilística foram realizadas. Resultados: O modelo previu que a estratégia mais eficiente é aquela que inclui a administração da penicilina na atenção primária aos casos de sífilis gestacional. Embora essa estratégia possa representar maior custo, apresenta maior efetividade. O custo por disability-adjusted life-years evitado com o uso dessa estratégia foi estimado em R$49,79. Conclusão: A estratégia de pré-natal nas unidades de atenção primária que inclui a administração da penicilina em gestantes com sífilis ainda no primeiro trimestre de gestação é a que apresenta o maior potencial para ser custo-efetiva.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Penicillin G Benzathine/therapeutic use , Prenatal Care/economics , Primary Health Care , Syphilis, Congenital/prevention & control , Penicillin G Benzathine/economics , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Cost-Benefit AnalysisABSTRACT
Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar el impacto sanitario y económico del control prenatal (CPN) en mujeres de hogares pobres. Material y métodos: Se tomó una muestra aleatoria de 9 244 mujeres embarazadas (población= 25 000). Se estimó la incidencia de mortalidad materna, los costos directos de atención y la diferencia de medias y proporciones. Los costos fueron estimados en dólares americanos (USD) de 2014, con perspectiva del tercer pagador. Resultados: El 75% de las mujeres viven en zonas urbanas. La media de edad fue de 23 años (IC95%: 23.5-23.8). El 87.5% asistió al menos a una cita de CPN. El costo medio de partos con CPN fue de USD$ 609.1 (IC95%: 581-632.7). Sin CPN fue de USD $857.8 (IC95%: 774.7-923.8). Los costos se incrementan 32% (IC95% 27.1-41) sin CPN. Conclusión: El CPN es una intervención eficiente y efectiva para la gestión del riesgo de la salud materna.
Abstract: Objective: To estimate health care costs of live births and the impact of prenatal care visit (PCV) in women from poor households. Materials and methods: A randomized sample of 9 244 pregnant women (out of total= 25 000). Mean differences and proportions were calculated to compare results in both groups of women. The costs were estimated in American Dollars (USD) 2014, from the payer’s perspective. Results: 75% of women live in urban areas. The mean age was 23 years old (CI95% 23.5-23.8). The average cost with PCV was USD 609.1 (CI95%: 581-632.7) and without PCV was USD 857.8 (CI95%: 774.7-923.8) and 87% of women attended at least one PCV. The health care costs increased in 32% (CI95% 27.1-41) in women who did not attended PCV. Conclusion: The PCV is an efficient and effective intervention for managing the risk of maternal health.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Young Adult , Prenatal Care/economics , Insurance, Health , Poverty , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population , Maternal Mortality , Public Health/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sampling Studies , Health Care Costs , Colombia , Cost ControlABSTRACT
Resumen: Objetivo: Comprobar la asociación entre el aseguramiento público en salud y la atención prenatal adecuada en mujeres adolescentes. Material y métodos: Análisis transversal de datos de 3 978 mujeres (N=4 522 296) que reportaron embarazo en la adolescencia (12-19 años), derivados de las Encuestas Nacional de Salud 2000 y de Salud y Nutrición 2006 y 2012. Mediante modelos de regresión logística se analizó oportunidad, frecuencia y contenido de la atención prenatal. Resultados: La probabilidad de recibir atención prenatal oportuna y frecuente aumentó de 0.60 (IC95%:0.56;0.64) en 2000 a 0.71 (IC95%:0.66;0.76) en 2012. En 2012 la probabilidad de recibir atención oportuna, frecuente y con contenido básico fue 0.54 (IC95%:0.49;0.58) siendo mayor en mujeres con Seguridad Social que en aquéllas afiliadas al Seguro Popular o sin aseguramiento. Conclusión: Contar con seguridad social incrementa la probabilidad de recibir atención prenatal adecuada en adolescentes en México.
Abstract: Objective: To test the association between public health insurance and adequate prenatal care among female adolescents in Mexico. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study, using the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2000, 2006, and 2012.We included 3 978 (N=4 522 296) adolescent (12-19) women who reported a live birth.We used logistic regression models to test the association of insurance and adequate (timeliness, frequency and content) prenatal care. Results: The multivariable predicted probability of timely and frequent prenatal care improved over time, from 0.60 (IC95%:0.56;0.64) in 2000 to 0.71 (IC95%:0.66;0.76) in 2012. In 2012, the probability of adequate prenatal care was 0.54 (IC95%:0.49;0.58); women with Social Security had higher probability than women with Seguro Popular and without health insurance. Conclusion: Having Social Security is associated with receipt of adequate prenatal care among adolescents in Mexico.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Pregnancy in Adolescence/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Prenatal Care/economics , Social Security , Socioeconomic Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Surveys , Medically Uninsured , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , MexicoABSTRACT
Abstract Aim This article aims to evaluate access to prenatal care according to the dimensions of availability, affordability and acceptability in the SUS microregion of southeastern Brazil. Methods A cross-sectional study conducted in 2012-2013 that selected 742 postpartum women in seven hospitals in the region chosen for the research. The information was collected, processed and submitted to the chi-square test and the nonparametric Spearman’s test, with p-values less than 5% (p < 0.05). Results Although the SUS constitutionally guarantees universal access to health care, there are still inequalities between pregnant women from rural and urban areas in terms of the availability of health care and among families earning up to minimum wage and more than one minimum wage per month in terms of affordability; however, the acceptability of health care was equal, regardless of the modality of the health services. Conclusion The location, transport resources and financing of health services should be reorganised, and the training of health professionals should be enhanced to provide more equitable health care access to pregnant women.
Resumo Este artigo tem por objetivo avaliar o acesso à assistência pré-natal segundo as dimensões de disponibilidade, capacidade de pagar e aceitabilidade, no SUS de uma microrregião do sudeste brasileiro. Trata-se de um estudo seccional, realizado em 2012-2013, que selecionou 742 puérperas em sete maternidades da região escolhida para a pesquisa. As informações foram coletadas, processadas e submetidas ao teste Qui-quadrado e ao teste não paramétrico de Spearman, com p-valor menor que 5% (p < 0,05). Apesar de o SUS garantir constitucionalmente o acesso universal ao sistema de saúde, nota-se que ainda existem iniquidades entre as puérperas da zona rural e urbana quanto à disponibilidade e, entre as famílias que ganham até um salário mínimo e mais de um salário mínimo por mês, quando se relaciona à capacidade de pagar, porém a aceitabilidade revelou-se igual, independentemente da modalidade dos serviços de saúde. O local de moradia, os recursos de transporte e o financiamento dos serviços de saúde devem ser reorganizados, e a formação dos profissionais de saúde aprimorada, a fim de oferecer um acesso mais justo às gestantes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Maternal Mortality , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Prenatal Care/economics , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Urban Health Services/economics , Urban Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health Services/economics , Rural Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/economicsABSTRACT
Objetivo. Explorar percepciones de proveedores de salud y beneficiarías del Programa Oportunidades sobre la práctica de actividad física durante el embarazo y posparto, e identificar características de la consejería sobre el tema en el primer nivel de atención en salud. Material y métodos. Estudio de métodos mixtos que forma parte de una intervención en nutrición del Programa Oportunidades. La información cualitativa se colectó por entrevista (50 mujeres; 34 proveedores de salud) y se obtuvo información cuantitativa a partir de un cuestionario (n=88 mujeres; n=64 proveedores; n=111 observaciones de consulta). Resultados. Se documentaron barreras a) individuales: falta de tiempo y de apoyo social; b) socioculturales: prejuicios de pares y familiares, y falta de instructores, y c) ambientales: falta de espacios físicos seguros y apropiados. 38% de las mujeres reporta haber recibido consejería sobre el tema versus 63.4% de proveedores que reportan haberla dado (p=0.002). Conclusiones. Urgen capacitación a proveedores y promoción de la actividad física que eliminen los prejuicios asociados al tema durante el embarazo y posparto.
Objective.To explore perceptions of healthcare providers and beneficiaries of Oportunidades program on physical activity during pregnancy and post-partum; and identify current reported practices related to counseling on physical activity in the primary healthcare services in Mexico. Materials and methods. A mixed methods approach was used which is part of a nutrition intervention of the Oportunidades program. Qualitative information was collected through interviews (50=women; 34=providers) and quantitative information was collected by questionnaires (n=88 women; n=64 provider; n=111 observations during consultation). Results. The main barriers were: a) individual (lack of time and social support to childcare); b) sociocultural (gender bias derived from peer groups or family and lack of instructors), and c) environmental (lack of safe and adequate physical places). Only 38% of beneficiary women reported having been counseled on physical activity vs 63.4% of providers who reported having counseled on physical activity (p=0.002). Conclusion. There is a need to train healthcare providers and to promote physical activity during pregnancy and post-partum for reducing associated biases.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Postnatal Care/economics , Postnatal Care/organization & administration , Postnatal Care/psychology , Exercise , Health Personnel/psychology , Postpartum Period/psychology , Poverty/psychology , Prenatal Care/economics , Prenatal Care/organization & administration , Prenatal Care/psychology , Pregnancy/psychology , Attitude to Health , Interviews as Topic , Patient Compliance , Counseling , Government Programs , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/organization & administration , MexicoABSTRACT
"The Supporting Program for Obstetric Care Underserved Areas (SPOU)" provides financial aids to rural community (or district) hospitals to reopen prenatal care and delivery services for regions without obstetrics and gynecology clinics or hospitals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early stage effect of the SPOU program. The proportion of the number of birth through SPOU was calculated by each region. Also survey was conducted to investigate the extent of overall satisfaction, elements of dissatisfaction, and suggestions for improvement of the program; 209 subjects participated from 7 to 12 December, 2012. Overall, 20% of pregnant women in Youngdong (71 cases) and Gangjin (106 cases) used their community (or district) hospitals through the SPOU whereas Yecheon (23 cases) was 8%; their satisfaction rates were high. Short distance and easy accessibility was the main reason among women choosing community (or district) hospital whereas the reasons of not selecting the community (or district) hospital were favor of the outside hospital's facility, system, and trust in the medical staffs. The SPOU seems to be currently effective at an early stage. However, to successfully implement this program, the government should make continuous efforts to recruit highly qualified medical staffs and improve medical facility and equipment.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Hospitals , Prenatal Care/economics , Program Evaluation , Republic of Korea , Rural PopulationABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate factors that influence antenatal care utilization and their association with adverse pregnancy outcomes [defined as low birth weight, stillbirth, preterm delivery or small for gestational age] among pregnant women in Kumasi. A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted of 643 women aged 19-48 years who presented for delivery at selected public hospitals and private traditional birth attendants from July-November 2011. Participants' information and factors influencing antenatal attendance were collected using a structured questionnaire and antenatal records. Associations between these factors and adverse pregnancy outcomes were assessed using chi-square and logistic regression. Nineteen percent of the women experienced an adverse pregnancy outcome. For 49% of the women, cost influenced their antenatal attendance. Cost was associated with increased likelihood of a woman experiencing an adverse outcome [adjusted OR = 2.15; 95% Cl = 1.16-3.99; p = 0.016]. Also, women with >5 births had an increased likelihood of an adverse outcome compared with women with single deliveries [adjusted OR = 3.77; 95% Cl = 1.50-9.53; p = 0.005]. The prevalence of adverse outcomes was lower than previously reported [44.6 versus 19%]. Cost and distance were associated with adverse outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Cost and distance could be minimized through a wider application of the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , National Health Programs , Prenatal Care/economics , Logistic Models , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Pregnancy Outcome , Health Services Accessibility , Cross-Sectional Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare inpatient and outpatient care costs for pregnant/parturient women with diabetes and mild hyperglycemia. METHODS: A prospective observational quantitative study was conducted in the Perinatal Diabetes Center in the city of Botucatu, Southeastern Brazil, between 2007 and 2008. Direct and indirect costs and disease-specific costs (medications and tests) were estimated. Thirty diet-treated pregnant women with diabetes were followed up on an outpatient basis, and 20 who required insulin therapy were hospitalized. RESULTS: The cost of diabetes disease (prenatal and delivery care) was US$ 3,311.84 for inpatients and US$ 1,366.04 for outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Direct and indirect costs as well as total prenatal care cost were higher for diabetic inpatients while delivery care costs and delivery-postpartum hospitalization were similar. Prenatal and delivery-postpartum care costs were higher for these patients compared to those paid by Brazilian National Health System.
OBJETIVO: Comparar custos de hospitalização e de atenção ambulatorial em gestantes/parturientes diabéticas e com hiperglicemia leve. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional, prospectivo, quantitativo descritivo realizado em centro de diabete perinatal em Botucatu, SP, entre 2007 e 2008. Foram estimados os custos por absorção diretos e indiretos disponíveis na instituição e os custos específicos para a doença (medicamentos e exames). As 30 gestantes diabéticas tratadas com dieta foram acompanhadas em ambulatório e 20 tratadas com dieta mais insulina foram hospitalizadas. RESULTADOS: O custo da doença diabete (para a assistência pré-natal e parto) foi de US$ 3,311.84 para as gestantes hospitalizadas e de US$ 1,366.04 para as acompanhadas em ambulatório. CONCLUSÕES: Os custos diretos e indiretos e o custo total da assistência pré-natal foram mais elevados nas gestantes diabéticas hospitalizadas enquanto os custos da assistência ao parto e hospitalização para parto e puerpério foram semelhantes. Os custos da assistência pré-natal como no parto/puerpério foram superiores aos valores pagos pelo Sistema Único de Saúde.
OBJETIVO: Comparar costos de hospitalización y de atención por ambulatorio en gestantes/parturientas diabéticas y con hiperglicemia leve. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional, prospectivo, cuantitativo descriptivo realizado en centro de diabetes perinatal en Botucatu, Sureste de Brasil, entre 2007 y 2008. Se estimaron los costos por absorción directos e indirectos disponibles en la institución y los costos específicos para la enfermedad (medicamentos y exámenes). Las 30 gestantes diabéticas tratadas con dieta fueron acompañadas en ambulatorio y 20 tratadas con dieta más insulina fueron hospitalizadas. RESULTADOS: El costo de la enfermedad diabetes (para asistencia prenatal y parto) fue de US$ 3,311.84 para las gestantes hospitalizadas y de US$ 1,366.04 para las acompañadas en ambulatorio. CONCLUSIONES: Los costos directos e indirectos y el costo total de la asistencia prenatal fueron más elevados en las gestantes diabéticas hospitalizadas mientras que los costos de la asistencia al parto y hospitalización para parto y puerperio fueron semejantes. Los costos de la asistencia prenatal como en el parto/puerperio fueron superiores a los valores pagados por el Sistema Único de Salud.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Ambulatory Care/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hyperglycemia/economics , Pregnancy in Diabetics/economics , Brazil , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Hyperglycemia/therapy , Postnatal Care/economics , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy in Diabetics/therapy , Prenatal Care/economics , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Pregnancies complicated by diabetes are associated with increased numbers of maternal and neonatal complications. Hospital costs increase according to the type of care provided. This study aimed to estimate the cost-benefit relationship and social profitability ratio of hospitalization, compared with outpatient care, for pregnant women with diabetes or mild hyperglycemia. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational quantitative study conducted at a university hospital. It included all pregnant women with pregestational or gestational diabetes, or mild hyperglycemia, who did not develop clinical intercurrences during pregnancy and who delivered at the Botucatu Medical School Hospital (Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, HC-FMB) of Universidade Estadual de São Paulo (Unesp). METHODS: Thirty pregnant women treated with diet were followed as outpatients, and twenty treated with diet plus insulin were managed through frequent short hospitalizations. Direct costs (personnel, materials and tests) and indirect costs (general expenses) were ascertained from data in the patients' records and the hospital's absorption costing system. The cost-benefit was then calculated. RESULTS: Successful treatment of pregnant women with diabetes avoided expenditure of US$ 1,517.97 and US$ 1,127.43 for patients treated with inpatient and outpatient care, respectively. The cost-benefit of inpatient care was US$ 143,719.16, and outpatient care, US$ 253,267.22, with social profitability of 1.87 and 5.35, respectively. CONCLUSION: Decision-tree analysis confirmed that successful treatment avoided costs at the hospital. Cost-benefit analysis showed that outpatient management was economically more advantageous than hospitalization. The social profitability of both treatments was greater than one, thus demonstrating that both types of care for diabetic pregnant women had positive benefits.
CONTEXTO E OBJETIVO: Gestações complicadas pelo diabetes estão associadas com aumento de complicações maternas e neonatais. Os custos hospitalares aumentam de acordo com a assistência prestada. O objetivo foi calcular o custo-benefício e a taxa de rentabilidade social da hospitalização comparada ao atendimento ambulatorial em gestantes com diabetes ou com hiperglicemia leve. DESENHO DO ESTUDO: Estudo prospectivo, observacional, quantitativo, realizado em hospital universitário, sendo incluídas todas as gestantes com diabetes pregestacional e gestacional ou com hiperglicemia leve que não desenvolveram intercorrências clínicas na gestação e que tiveram parto no Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista (HC-FMB-Unesp). MÉTODOS: Trinta gestantes tratadas com dieta foram acompanhadas em ambulatório e 20 tratadas com dieta e insulina foram abordadas com hospitalizações curtas e frequentes. Foram obtidos custos diretos (pessoal, material e exames) e indiretos (despesas gerais) a partir de dados contidos no prontuário e no sistema de custo por absorção do hospital e posteriormente calculado o custo-benefício. RESULTADOS: O sucesso do tratamento das gestantes diabéticas evitou o gasto de US$ 1.517,97 e US$ 1.127,43 para pacientes hospitalizadas e ambulatoriais, respectivamente. O custo-benefício da atenção hospitalizada foi US$ 143.719,16 e ambulatorial, US$ 253.267,22, com rentabilidade social 1,87 e 5,35 respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: A análise "árvore de decisão" confirma que o sucesso dos tratamentos elimina custos no hospital. A relação custo-benefício indicou que o tratamento ambulatorial é economicamente mais vantajoso do que a hospitalização. A rentabilidade social de ambos os tratamentos foi maior que 1, indicando que ambos os tipos de atendimento à gestante diabética têm benefício positivo.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Ambulatory Care/economics , Decision Trees , Diabetes, Gestational/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Hyperglycemia/economics , Prenatal Care/economics , Brazil , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Hyperglycemia/therapy , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
La actual coyuntura económica brasileña trae consecuencias para el Estado en todas sus esferas, implicando en una cuidadosa planificación de sus administradores. Así, la aplicación adecuada de su presupuesto es uno de los objetivos primordiales anhelado por el sector salud. El presente estudio presentará una metodología para la apropiación de costos de la atención prenatal de bajo riesgo, que puede servir de subsidio para investigaciones científicas e intervención en la planificación y evaluación de costos. Esta apropiación se realizó teniendo como escenario la Salud de la Familia, al cual acuden las embarazadas de forma prioritaria. En la perspectiva de la cobertura universal a la que se propone el Sistema Único de Salud (SUS), el correcto estimado de los costos hará posible la contribución en la formulación presupuestaria y en la programación de recursos para garantizar una atención de calidad.
Brazilian economy nowadays shows that what is most important is for every sector to carefully plan, instead of merely spending finite financial resources. Thus, the adequate application of each health budget item has been one of the main goals of health planners and managers. This study aims to present a methodology for the appropriation of production costs in health care to low-risk pregnant women. It also intends to give the basis to the construction of a cost-evaluation methodology that can be used for both research and health planning. This appropriation was based on the scenario of the Family Health in São Paulo, Brazil. As the Brazilian Unified Health System has a universal covering perspective, the accurate estimate of production costs can contribute to the budget formulation and to the resources programming which seems essential to guarantee the quality of health assistance.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Brazil , Cost AllocationABSTRACT
Objetivo: Determinar el costo oportunidad de la embarazada que demanda atención en primer nivel de atención. Método: Estudio de costo oportunidad en la embarazada atendida en consulta de Medicina Familiar, Laboratorio y Farmacia, que acudieron solas o acompañadas a 3 unidades de Medicina Familiar. Se estudiaron 807 embarazadas. La técnica muestral contempló conglomerados (Unidad Médica), estratos (consultorio) y al interior por cuota. Se estudió edad, estado civil, ocupación y número de acompañantes. El costo oportunidad se evaluó a través de tiempo invertido y el costo por minuto; se estimó para el traslado, espera y atención en los tres servicios señalados, para la paciente y acompañante. Se utilizó porcentajes, promedios e intervalos de confianza del 95 por ciento. Resultados: El costo oportunidad de la embarazada sola en consulta de Medicina Familiar es $46,48 (IC95 por ciento 41,68-51,27), del acompañante 1 $49,91 (IC 95 por ciento 41,49-58,39) y acompañante 2 $9,84 (IC95 por ciento 4,05-15,99); cuando la embarazada acude con un acompañante el costo oportunidad es de $95,62 y con dos acompañantes $106,23. El costo oportunidad de la embarazada sola en Farmacia es $22,14 y en Laboratorio $34,82. El costo oportunidad ajustado por número de acompañantes en consulta de Medicina Familiar es $77,14; si utiliza en la misma visita la consulta de Medicina Familiar, Laboratorio y Farmacia es de $104,20. Conclusión: El costo oportunidad en la paciente embarazada que demanda atención en primer nivel tiene variaciones importantes determinadas por el número de servicios que utilice y la presencia de acompañantes.
Objective: To determine the cost opportunity for pregnant women who receive first-level health care. Methods. Cost opportunity study including 807 pregnant tamales who received first-level care in the family medicine, laboratory and pharmacy areas. The sample was distributed by medical unit and stratified by office. Variables included age, marital status, occupation, number of accompanying; cost opportunity was estimated for transfers, waiting and care time in the mentioned service areas. Cost opportunity was calculated for the patient and for those persons who accompanied the patient and included the time invested and cost per minute. Statistical analysis included averages and 95 percent confidence intervals. Results. Cost opportunity for pregnant alone in family medicine is $46.48 (IC 95 percent 41.68-51.27), companion 1 $49.91 (IC 95 percent 41.49-58.39) and companion 2 $9.84 (IC 95 percent 4.05-15.99); for pregnant women and one companion, cost opportunity is $95.62 and whit two companions $106.23. Cost opportunity for pregnant women alone in pharmacy is $22.14 and laboratory $34.82. Cost opportunity adjusted by companions in family medicine is $77.14, if used in the same visit family medicine, laboratory and pharmacy is $104.20. Conclusion. Cost opportunity for a pregnant woman who receives first-level care it has significant variations determined by the number of services that use and the presence of companions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Prenatal Care/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Primary Health Care , Appointments and Schedules , Accompanying Family Members/economics , Decision Making , Health Care Costs , Health Care Economics and Organizations , Health Services Needs and Demand , Family Practice/economics , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
Cerca de 97 por cento das crianças brasileiras iniciam a amamentação ao peito nas primeiras horas de vida. No entanto, o início do desmame é precoce, ocorrendo nas primeiras semanas ou meses de vida, com a introdução de água, chás, sucos, outros leites e alimentos. Fatores sociais, culturais, psicológicos e econômicos, ligados à mãe e ao bebê, podem estar relacionados a variações das práticas alimentares de crianças nos primeiros meses de vida. OBJETIVO: Investigar a associação entre rede e apoio social e as práticas alimentares de lactentes no quarto mês de vida. MÉTODOS: Estudo seccional inserido em uma coorte prospectiva, tendo como população fonte recém-nascidos acolhidos em Unidades Básicas de Saúde da Secretaria Municipal de Saúde do Rio de Janeiro. Para avaliar as práticas alimentares foi aplicado às mães (n=313) um recordatório 24h adaptado e foram construídos dois indicadores considerando o consumo de alimentos sólidos e da alimentação láctea. Para medir rede social foram feitas perguntas relacionadas ao número de parentes e amigos com quem a mulher pode contar e à participação em atividades sociais em grupo. Para aferir apoio social foi utilizada uma escala utilizada no Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) e adaptada para uso no Brasil. A análise dos dados se baseou em modelos de regressão logística multinomial, estimando-se razões de chance e respectivos intervalos de 95 por cento de confiança para as associações entre as variáveis...
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Feeding/adverse effects , Breast Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Breast Feeding/psychology , Eating/standards , Infant Nutrition/economics , Infant Nutrition/education , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/economics , Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/standards , Brazil/ethnology , Prenatal Care/economics , Nutritional Requirements/ethnology , Recommended Dietary Allowances/economics , Recommended Dietary Allowances/trends , Social Support , Health Services/economicsABSTRACT
Limited information exists on maternal perspectives of prenatal sonogram in north-eastern Nigeria. This study was aimed at documenting the views and expectations of pregnant women concerning prenatal sonogram as well as their level of awareness of its purpose, limitations and safety in a predominantly Moslem society. A survey was carried out on a convenience sample of 150 patients referred from ante-natal clinics for prenatal sonogram, by administering semi-structured questionnaires. The results show that 61.3% of the women had prenatal sonogram, with little or no information about the purpose, capabilities and limitations of the procedure. 24.7% had neither formal western nor Islamic educational background that may have influenced their perceptions. Most of the women [81.3%] were sponsored by either government or their husbands, 72.7% perceived sonogram to be affordable and 63.4% viewed sonographic results as reliable. The perceived main reasons for having a prenatal sonogram were to determine the expected date of delivery and foetal well-being, and to obtain reassurance of maternal health. Sex determination and number of foetuses were the least considered reasons. The study indicates that providing pregnant women with adequate information and sensitising them to the purpose and limitations of sonograms is necessary to guarantee its rational utilisation. Improving patient care, enhancing the skill of sonographers and providing more facilities would improve the services and patients' perspectives of prenatal sonography
Subject(s)
Female , Male , Prenatal Care/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Surveys and Questionnaires , Mothers/psychology , Awareness , Knowledge , Maternal WelfareABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Comparar mediante un modelo de análisis de decisiones tres estrategias de tamizaje de la infección por el VIH en mujeres embarazadas según su relación costo-efectividad y proponer la más apropiada para el sistema de salud colombiano. MÉTODOS: Estudio económico basado en el análisis mediante árboles de decisión según tres estrategias de tamizaje de la infección por el VIH en mujeres embarazadas: la voluntaria, la universal y la opcional. Se consideró a todas las mujeres colombianas embarazadas sin diagnóstico de infección por el VIH que se presentaban para el parto. Se emplearon los costos médicos directos desde la realización de la prueba hasta un año después del parto, según el Sistema General de Seguridad Social en Salud. Se compararon las razones costo-efectividad y el ahorro de cada estrategia analizada. RESULTADOS: Por cada 10 000 mujeres, la estrategia universal permitió detectar 5 casos más que la estrategia voluntaria y 7 casos más que la opcional. La estrategia universal generó costos aproximados de US$ 17,00 por cada recién nacido positivo, es decir, menos de la mitad que lo calculado para la estrategia voluntaria (US$ 38,00) y menor que para la opcional (US$ 24,00). Según el análisis bifactorial, la estrategia de tamizaje universal fue menos costosa que la voluntaria y más efectiva que las otras dos estrategias, independientemente de la prevalencia, la tasa de positivos falsos del sistema de diagnóstico empleado y la tasa de aceptación materna para realizarse la prueba de tamizaje. CONCLUSIONES: La estrategia de tamizaje voluntaria, que se utiliza actualmente en Colombia, es más costosa que la universal a mediano y largo plazos y tiene menor efectividad y capacidad de prevención. Se recomienda a las autoridades nacionales de salud realizar el tamizaje de la infección por el VIH a todas las embarazadas colombianas con pruebas de tercera generación.
OBJECTIVES: To apply decision analysis to compare the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for HIV screening of pregnant women and to recommend the one most appropriate for the health care system of Colombia. METHODS: An economic study applying decision analysis to three types of HIV screening of expectant women: voluntary, universal, and optional. All the women in Colombia with unknown HIV status who were admitted for child birth were included. The study included all the direct medical costs incurred from the time of testing through the first year following delivery, according to the General System for Healthcare Social Security. Cost-effectiveness ratio and the savings of each of the strategies were compared. RESULTS: For every 10 000 women, the universal strategy detected five cases more than the voluntary strategy and seven cases more than the optional. The universal strategy carried a cost of approximately US$ 17 for each HIV-positive newborn; that is, less than half of that of the voluntary strategy (US$ 38) and less than the optional (US$ 24). According to the bifactorial analysis, the universal screening strategy was less costly than the voluntary and more effective than both of the others, regardless of prevalence, the false-positive rate of each method, and the rate of maternal compliance with screening. CONCLUSIONS: The screening strategy currently in use in Colombia is more costly (in both the medium- and long-term), less effective, and less capable of prevention, than the universal screening strategy. The recommendation to the national health authorities of Colombia is to begin screening all pregnant women for HIV infection using third-generation testing.
Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy , AIDS Serodiagnosis/methods , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Mandatory Testing , Mass Screening/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Prenatal Care/methods , Voluntary Programs , AIDS Serodiagnosis/economics , Blotting, Western/economics , Colombia/epidemiology , Costs and Cost Analysis , Decision Trees , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/economics , False Positive Reactions , HIV Infections/congenital , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/economics , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/economics , Mandatory Testing/economics , Mass Screening/economics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/economics , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Prenatal Care/economics , Voluntary Programs/economicsABSTRACT
Objetivo: Estimar el costo de la atención prenatal. Métodos: Estudio de costo realizado en pacientes de la institución de seguridad social más grande de México, el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS). Se incluyeron 402 pacientes elegidas aleatoriamente posteriores a la atención del parto. Se identificó el tipo y la intensidad de uso de los servicios en la etapa prenatal, se relacionó con el costo de la atención, el que fue estimado mediante departamentalización ajustada por productividad y microcosteo. Se utilizaron promedios, porcentajes e intervalos de confianza, el costo se calculó por tipo de departamento utilizado. Resultados: Los departamento con mayor porcentaje de uso fueron: consulta de medicina familiar 85,8 por ciento (IC95 por ciento: 82,4-89,29) y medicina preventiva 85,3 por ciento (IC95 por ciento: 81,8-88,8). El 8,2 por ciento de las atenciones correspondieron a consulta de atención prenatal asociado con infección de vías urinarias, en laboratorio el estudio más frecuentemente realizado fue el examen general de orina 25,2 por ciento. El costo promedio en primer nivel de atención correspondió a US$139,78 (IC95 por ciento: 125,42 -154,01). Los departamentos y servicios de mayor costo fueron medicina familiar y laboratorio US$69,93 (IC95 por ciento: 64,72-75,13) y US$32,73 (IC95 por ciento: 30,26 -35,15), respectivamente. Conclusión: No existe un método único para la estimación de los costos, lo cual obliga a cuestionar la comparación de los resultados, pero no se puede negar que en una estructura de mercado el costo estimado es la herramienta que permite a la empresa salir al mercado y enfrentar la competencia, y desde esta perspectiva la comparación es válida.
Objective: To estimate the cost of prenatal care. Methods: Cost study in patients of the largest social security institution in Mexico, the Mexican Institute for Social Security (IMSS). Atotal of 402 women randomly selected after delivery. Type of service and intensity of use during the prenatal care were identified and related to the cost of attention, which was estimated by productivity and microcosting adjusted departmentalization. Analysis included means, percentages and confidence intervals; cost was calculated by type of department. Results: The departments with highest percentage of use were the family medicine department with 85.8 percent (95 percentCI: 82.4-89.29) and preventive medicine with 85.3 percent (95 percentCI: 81.8-88.8). Approximately 8.2 percent of the visits to prenatal care services were associated with urinary tract infection. In laboratory, the most frequently performed study was urinalysis with 25.2 percent. The mean cost at primary care level was US$139.78 (95 percentCI: 125.42-154.01) and the most expensive departments were family medicine and the laboratory at US$69.93 (95 percentCI 64.72-75.13) and US$32.73 (95 percentCI 30.26-35.15), respectively. Conclusion:The prenatal cost at primary care level is low, the most important are in family medicine and laboratory. There is no single method for cost estimation, thus, result comparisons are questionable. However, it cannot be denied that, within a market structure, cost estimates are the tools that allow entry into the market and confrontation of competitors, and from this perspective, the comparison is valid.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Prenatal Care/economics , Social Security , Prenatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , MexicoABSTRACT
A household survey was undertaken in Matlab, a rural area of Bangladesh, to estimate the costs incurred during pregnancy, delivery, and the postpartum period for women delivering at home and in a health facility. Those interviewed included 121 women who delivered at home, 120 who delivered in an ICDDR,B basic obstetric care (BEOC) facility, 27 who delivered in a public comprehensive obstetric care (CEOC) hospital, and 58 who delivered in private hospitals. There was no significant difference in total costs incurred by those delivering at home and those delivering in a BEOC facility. Costs for those delivering in CEOC facilities were over nine times greater than for those delivering in BEOC facilities. Costs of care during delivery were predominant. Antenatal and postnatal care added between 7% and 30% to the total cost. Services were more equitable at home and in a BEOC facility compared to services provided at CEOC facilities. The study highlights the regressive nature of the financing of CEOC services and the need for a financing strategy that covers both the costs of referral and BEOC care for those in need.
Subject(s)
Adult , Bangladesh , Delivery, Obstetric/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Home Childbirth/economics , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Maternal Health Services/economics , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and cost-effectiveness of prenatal prevention measurement in severe thalassemia diseases at Srinagarind Hospital. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. SETTING: Antenatal care (ANC) Clinic, Srinagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University. SUBJECTS: 1,498 thalassemic screened pregnant women first presenting at ANC Clinic at gestational age less than 17 weeks. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Medical records of thalassemic screened pregnant women between February 2002 and February 2005 were analyzed. Those with a value of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) less than 80 fl, or positive dichlorophenol indophenol precipitation test (KKU-DCIP Clear Reagent Kit) underwent hemoglobin (Hb) typing by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) together with thalassemia investigation (complete blood count, MCV and Hb typing) of their husbands and to identify couples at risk of 3 severe thalassemia diseases; Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis, homozygous, -thalassemia and, -thalassemia/ Hb E disease. Then they were advised to undergo DNA analysis and, if they had fetal risk, appropriate prenatal diagnosis was offered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Number of affected fetuses detected by prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety six pregnant women (66.49%) were positive on screening. Of these, 642 (64.46%) had thalassemia investigation done with their spouses. There were 19 couples at risk (1.27% of total screened pregnant women) for having fetal severe thalassemia disease from initial laboratory results. Most of them were, -thalassemia/ Hb E diseases. We found only 10 pregnant women (52.63%) that had undergone prenatal diagnosis. The consequent results were two affected fetuses (20%), one was Hb Bart's hydrops fetalis, and the other was, o-thalassemia/ Hb E disease. In these cases, their parents decided to discontinue the pregnancy. Our prevention program could save 1.14 million bahts for the cost of treatment in two prevented severe thalassemia cases. CONCLUSION: The prenatal prevention program of severe thalassemia disease at Srinagarind Hospital can effectively detect affected fetuses and reduce severe thalassemia disease, which is a major health problem in Thailand.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Prenatal Diagnosis , Program Evaluation , Risk Assessment , Thailand , Thalassemia/diagnosisABSTRACT
Se presenta una evaluación económica parcial, del tipo análisis de costos, en el grupo de gastos de bolsillo. La muestra estuvo constituida por 340 mujeres distribuidas en 2 grupos, uno de control y otro de intervención. La investigación se realizó en 10 policlínicos de 3 municipios de la Ciudad de La Habana, cuyas mujeres generalmente realizan su parto en el Hospital América Arias. En el momento de la investigación los policlínicos estaban participando en un estudio más amplio, que incluye la evaluación económica y que se clasifica como ensayo controlado aleatorizado multicéntrico, auspiciado por la OMS, para validar un protocolo de atención de 4 consultas prenatales en relación con el programa habitual. La muestra se calculó con una amplitud razonable para el intervalo de confianza de los valores promedios. La fuente de información básica fue un cuestionario aplicado a todas las mujeres. Los principales resultados destacan las particularidades de los costos estudiados no sólo entre los 2 grupos sino entre cada policlínico y son expresados en frecuencias absolutas, y porcentajes, con cálculo de la media, la desviación estándar (DS) y pruebas de significación. La cantidad de consultas superó discretamente las establecidas en el protocolo de atención, el tiempo de transporte y consulta fue similar en ambos grupos. En el costo oportunidad las embarazadas preferían no combinar la consulta con otra actividad. No hubo variaciones estadísticamente significativas entre los 2 grupos, en relación con los gastos de bolsillo asociados con la consulta de atención prenatal
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Economics , Health Care Costs , Health Care Economics and OrganizationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the costs of maternal health services in Rosario, Argentina. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The provider costs (US$ 1999) of antenatal care, a normal vaginal delivery and a caesarean section, were evaluated retrospectively in two municipal hospitals. The cost of an antenatal visit was evaluated in two health centres and the patient costs associated with the visit were evaluated in a hospital and a health centre. RESULTS: The average cost per hospital day is $114.62. The average cost of a caesarean section ($525.57) is five times greater than that of a normal vaginal delivery ($105.61). A normal delivery costs less at the general hospital and a c-section less at the maternity hospital. The average cost of an antenatal visit is $31.10. The provider cost is lower at the health centre than at the hospital. Personnel accounted for 72-94 percent of the total cost and drugs and medical supplies between 4-26 percent. On average, an antenatal visit costs women $4.70. Direct costs are minimal compared to indirect costs of travel and waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the potential for increasing the efficiency of resource use by promoting antenatal care visits at the primary level. Women could also benefit from reduced travel and waiting time. Similar benefits could accrue to the provider by encouraging normal delivery at general hospitals, and complicated deliveries at specialised maternity hospitals