Autoria, subjetividade e poder: devolução de dados em um centro de saúde na Guariroba (Ceilândia/DF) / Authority, subjectivity and power: data devolution at a primary care unit in Guariroba (Ceilândia/Federal District/Brazil)

ResumoA devolução, restituição ou compartilhamento pode significar, dentre outras possibilidades, entregar produtos aos partícipes de um empreendimento de pesquisa/extensão. A entrega de resultados não é uma prática nova na antropologia, embora ainda seja pouco usual, sistematizada e valorizada. Neste artigo, relato e discuto uma experiência de devolução de materiais de um projeto de extensão da antropologia, que foi desenvolvido dentro de um centro de saúde, na região periférica do Distrito Federal. As reações aos materiais foram muito diferentes do esperado pela equipe do projeto, mas ainda assim permitiu fazer avançar o diálogo entre os envolvidos e, mais do que isso, permitiu que o conhecimento sobre as relações de trabalho dentro dessa instituição de saúde fosse aprofundado. Não é somente porque foi logrado o aval de comitês de ética que as negociações sobre a entrada e permanência em projetos acadêmicos estão garantidas continuamente. As relações de subjetividade, poder e autoria permeiam qualquer iniciativa antropológica, antes de começá-la e muito depois de, supostamente, terminá-la.

AbstractDevolution, restitution or sharing can mean, within other possibilities, to offer products to participants of a research or an extension project. Far from a new practice in Anthropology, returning results is still unusual, little organized and valued. This paper presents and discusses a devolution experience by an extension project in Anthropology that was developed in a primary care unit in the outskirts of Distrito Federal (Brazil). Local reactions were very different from what was expected by the project's staff, but still permitted dialogue with the health professionals and, more important, deepened our knowledge about work relations in this health institution. Even though IRB approval has been granted, negotiations about starting and continuing academic projects have to be negotiated continuously. Subjectivity, power and authority permeate any anthropological initiative from its beginning and much after it supposedly has been concluded.

The role of Hispanic race/ethnicity and poverty in breast cancer survival

The association of Hispanic race/ethnicity and poverty with general survival time and breast cancer survival time was examined for a total of 14,896 breast cancer patients (14,035 White and 861 Hispanic) included in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (NCI SEER) program in New Mexico and San Francisco between 1975 and 1984. Variables examined included: age, marital status, stage at diagnosis, tumor histology, delay, treatment, period of diagnosis (1975-79 vs. 1980-84), and poverty. Univariate analysis of 14,896 patients indicated that a greater proportion of Hispanics (vs. Whites) with breast cancer were: younger than age 50, married, diagnosed at a later stage, diagnosed in New Mexico, lived in greater poverty, were diagnosed between 1980-84, and died from breast cancer. Univariate Cox Proportion Hazards analysis indicated that poverty was a significant predictor for reduced general survival time. Being diagnosed in the 1980-84 period was a predictor for improved general survival time. Poverty and Hispanic race/ethnicity were significant predictors of reduced breast cancer survival time. Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards models indicated that Hispanic race/ethnicity was a significant risk factor for breast cancer survival time for women aged 50 and older. For White women: state, marital status, poverty, surgery, radiation/hormonal treatments, and histology were significant risk factors for breast cancer survival time. For Hispanic women: stage, surgery, hormonal treatment and period of diagnosis were significant risk factors for breast cancer survival time. For White breast cancer patients, period of diagnosis was not a significant risk factor for reduced breast cancer survival time; but for Hispanics, it was a significant risk factor. In the age and race/ethnicity-stratified models of breast cancer survival time, similar risk factors emerged for both Whites and Hispanics. For both younger and older Hispanics, being diagnosed in the early 1980's (vs. the late 1970's) was associated with reduced breast cancer survival time--vs. Whites, who experienced no significant change in breast cancer survival time in the same time period. Poverty was not a predictor for Hispanic survival time in any of the models; however, it was a predictor for younger Whites for breast cancer survival time. These results fueled discussion in three areas targeting breast cancer in underserved women: the development of racial/ethnic-specific cancer control guidelines, the development of a breast cancer integrated delivery system, and population management