ABSTRACT
Background:Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common conditions in clinical practice. Motelukast and second generation antihistamine fexofenadine are routinely used in the management of allergic rhinitis. Individually both drugs have been found to be effective in allergic rhinitis. Fixed dose combination of montelukast 10 mg plus fexofenadine 120 mg is available in India is also used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast and fexofenadine fixed dose combination in the management of patients with allergic rhinitis. Material and methods: Post marketing observational study was conducted in 809 patients from all over India. All the patients were treated with montelukast 10 mg plus fexofenadine 120 mg fixed dose combination once daily for 14 days. The primary outcome criteria was the change in total symptom score (Sum of total nasal symptom score and total ocular symptom score) at the end of study compared to baseline. The secondary outcome criteria included change in total nasal symptom score (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, and sneezing) and total ocular symptom score (Itching/burning eyes, tearing/ watering eyes and eye redness) at the end of study compared to baseline and physician’s and patient’s global assessment for efficacy and tolerability. The patients were evaluated at baseline, day 7 and day 14 for efficacy evaluation while the safety parameters were assessed at screening and day 14. Results: The fixed dose combination of fexofenadine plus montelukast was significantly effective in reducing total symptom score, total nasal symptom score and total ocular symptom score (p<0.0001 for all parameters). The global assessment of efficacy evaluation by both patient and investigators demonstrated “excellent to good” efficacy in >95% of patients. Most of the study population reported “good” tolerability with the fixed drug combination. No adverse events were reported in the study. Conclusion: The fixed dose combination of fexofenadine plus montelukast was found to be efficacious and well tolerated in allergic rhinitis in Indian adult patients.
Subject(s)
Acetates/administration & dosage , Acetates/analogs & derivatives , Acetates/pharmacology , Adult , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , India , Male , Middle Aged , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Quinolines/analogs & derivatives , Quinolines/pharmacology , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic/epidemiology , Terfenadine/administration & dosage , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , Terfenadine/pharmacology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Histamine is the major mediator of allergic reactions. Newer H1 antihistaminics like levocetirizine, fexofenadine, and desloratadine are used in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and urticaria. The ability to block the cutaneous response to intradermal histamine is used to evaluate the potential of antihistamines. AIMS: To compare the potency, onset, and duration of action of the commonly used antihistamines-levocetirizine, fexofenadine, and desloratadine. METHODS: Thirty volunteers were given three single doses of levocetirizine, fexofenadine and desloratadine at weekly intervals. A pretest was performed by using the intradermal histamine prick test. After administration of the drugs, the intradermal test was repeated at (1/2), 1, 2, 3, 6 and 24 h, and the sizes of the wheal were measured. The mean values were taken and were compared by using Levene's t-test. RESULTS: At 30 min, fexofenadine showed a statistically significant suppression of wheal size compared to levocetirizine and desloratadine. Two and three hours after administration, levocetirizine and fexofenadine showed statistically significant inhibition of wheal size while only levocetirizine had this effect after six hours when compared to desloratadine. Desloratadine showed greater inhibition of wheal size at the end of 24 h when compared to levocetirizine and fexofenadine but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Fexofenadine had the earliest onset of action while levocetirizine showed maximum inhibition of wheal response after three and six hours.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Cetirizine/pharmacology , Histamine/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/pharmacology , Humans , Injections, Intradermal , Loratadine/analogs & derivatives , Middle Aged , Terfenadine/analogs & derivatives , Time Factors , Urticaria/chemically induced , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Non-sedating antihistamines (loratadine, fexofenadine, and cetirizine) have been widely used in Thailand. This study examined the time-of-onset and compared the 95% inhibitory effect of these agents on histamine-induced cutaneous reaction so as to understand the diversity of their efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Thirty-one atopic patients were randomized into 4 treatment groups, placebo (n = 7), loratadine (n = 8), fexofenadine (n = 8), and cetirizine (n = 8). They were pricked with histamine every 30 min for 4 hrs. The percentage change of the wheal/flare area was calculated. RESULTS: All active treatments showed wheal suppression superior to placebo after 210 min for loratadine (P = 0.04); 90 min for fexofenadine (P = 0.009); and 60 min for cetirizine (P = 0.02), while flare suppression was significantly marked after 150 min (P = 0.0008) for loratadine; 90 min for fexofenadine (P = 0.0001), and 60 min for cetirizine (P = 0.006). All drugs except loratadine demonstrated a 95% suppression of wheal superior to the placebo (P = 0.001 for fexofenadine; P = 0.0001 for cetirizine). Only fexofenadine exhibited a 95% suppression of flare statistically superior to placebo (P = 0.02). Discrepancies among the effects of these 3 antihistamines were also detected. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: All antihistamines tested repressed the wheal-and-flare area superbly over the placebo within 4 hours. Cetirizine exerted the fastest onset, and it also appeared to be the most efficacious inhibitor. The heterogeneity of their efficacy probably stems from their diverse physicochemical properties, which have also been discussed.