ABSTRACT
En pacientes con estrechez uretral bulbar de una longitud mayor a 2 cm, que no sean candidatos a otras técnicas, se realiza uretroplastia con injerto. Actualmente se emplean diversas técnicas, cada una con ventajas y desventajas propias. Describir las ventajas y desventajas de las técnicas quirúrgicas empleadas actualmente en la uretroplastia con injerto, así como sus tasas de éxito. Se hizo una búsqueda en PubMed, ClinicalKey y en ScienceDirect, utilizando las palabras claves: "urethral stricture," "urethroplasty," "oral graft" y "flap." Se utilizaron los estudios más relevantes, tanto originales como revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, en inglés y en español. Las diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas ofrecen ventajas y desventajas teóricas frente a las otras, aunque las tasas de éxito en todas es cercana al 90%, sin ser una francamente superior frente a las demás. La elección de la técnica quirúrgica a realizar depende de las preferencias y experiencia del cirujano, dado que la tasa de éxito para todas las técnicas es similar.
In patients with urethral stricture longer than 2 cm who are not candidates for other techniques, graft urethroplasty is the most performed surgery. Currently, several techniques are used, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical techniques currently used in graft urethroplasty, as well as their success rates. A search was made in PubMed, ClinicalKey and ScienceDirect, using the keywords: "urethral stenosis," "urethroplasty," "oral graft" and "flap." The most relevant original studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes were used, both in English and Spanish. The different surgical techniques offer theoretical advantages compared with the others, although the success rates in all are close to 90%, without being frankly superior compared with the others. The choice of the surgical technique to be performed depends on the preferences and experience of the surgeon, given that the success rate for all techniques is similar.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Urethral Stricture , Constriction, Pathologic , Surgical Flaps , Urogenital Surgical Procedures , Urology/methods , TransplantsABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The COVID-19 outbreak has led to the deferral of a great number of surgeries in an attempt to reduce transmission of infection, free up hospital beds, intensive care and anaesthetists, and limit aerosol-generating procedures. Guidelines and suggestions have been provided to categorize Urological diseases into risk groups and recommendations are available on procedures that can be or cannot be deferred. We aim to summarise updates on diagnosis, treatment and follow up of bladder cancer during the COVID-19 outbreaks.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/diagnosis , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Urology/methods , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The new disease COVID-19 pandemic has completely modified our lifestyle, changing our personal habits and daily activities and strongly our professional activity. Following World Health Organization (WHO) and health care authorities around the World recommendations, all elective surgeries from benign diagnose procedures must be postponed and imperatively continue working on emergent and oncological urgent pathologies. Surgical elective treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is not considered as a priority. During BPH endoscopic surgeries, urine and blood are mixed with the irrigation liquid implying a risk of viral presence. Furthermore, a steam and smoke bubble is being accumulated inside the bladder implying the risk of splashing and aerosols. The risks of other viral infections have been identified during endourological procedures and they are related to splashing events. Several studies observed 33-100% of splashing on goggles. All BPH endoscopic procedures must be postponed. In case of complete urinary obstruction, this event can be adequately treated by urethral or suprapubic catheter under local anesthesia. As soon as local COVID-19 prevalence decreases, endourological procedures could be restarted. As protocols are being validating around the World to redeem elective surgeries, a symptomatic obstructed patient could be operated knowing his COVID-19 status with a molecular PCR, a cleaned epidemiological interview with a normal preoperative protocol. If patient is COVID-19+, surgery must be delayed until complete recovery, because mortality could increase as Lei from Wuhan describes. Informed consent must include risks of complications related to COVID-19 disease. Surgery must be performed by an experienced surgeon in order to avoid increase of operating time and risks of complications. Surgical approach of BPH must be considered depending on availability of disposable material, infrastructure, and the epidemiological COVID-19 status of your area. The main aim is patients and healthcare staff safety.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prostatic Hyperplasia/therapy , Urology/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Infection Control , Elective Surgical Procedures , Pandemics , Personal Protective Equipment , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: Propose an approach of prostate cancer (PCa) patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Material and Methods: We conducted a review of current literature related to surgical and clinical management of patients during COVID-19 crisis paying special attention to oncological ones and especially those suffering from PCa. Based on these publications and current urological guidelines, a manual to manage PCa patients is suggested. Results: Patients suffering from cancer are likely to develop serious complications from COVID-19 disease together with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the management of oncological patients should be taken into special consideration and most of the treatments postponed. In case the procedure is not deferrable, it should be adapted to the current situation. While the shortest radiotherapy (RT) regimens should be applied, surgical procedures must undergo the following recommendations proposed by main surgical associations. PCa prognosis is generally favourable and therefore one can safely delay most of the biopsies up to 6 months without interfering with survival outcomes in the vast majority of cases. In the same way, most of the localised PCa patients are suitable for active surveillance (AS) or hormonal therapy until local definitive treatment could be reconsidered. In metastatic as well as castration resistant PCa stages, adding androgen receptor targeted agents (abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide) to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) could be considered in high risk patients. On the contrary, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and Radium-223 must be avoided with regard to the consequence of hematologic toxicity and risk of COVID-19 infection because of immunodepression. Conclusions: Most of the biopsies should be delayed while AS is advised in those patients with low risk PCa. ADT allows us to defer definitive local treatment in many cases of intermediate and high risk PCa. In regard to metastatic and castration resistant PCa, combination therapies with abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide could be considered. Chemotherapy, Radium-223 and immunotherapy are discouraged.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Urology/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic useABSTRACT
ABSTRACT This review discusses the impact of COVID-19 in Female Urology, revises the most important disorders in this field and how their diagnosis and treatment may be modified due to the current pandemic. The text also discusses new options such as telemedicine and what clinical situations within Female Urology should be of utmost importance for the urologist to be careful about. We also discuss how surgeries are being postponed are resumed according to the local scenario.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Urology/trends , COVID-19/epidemiology , Urology/methods , Telemedicine , Female Urogenital Diseases , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose: To provide recommendations on the endourological management of lithiasis in the scenario of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: A non-systematic review in PubMed and the grey literature, as well as recommendations by a panel of stakeholders was made, regarding management, surgical considerations and follow-up of patients affected by lithiasis in the COVID-19 era. Results: Under the current outbreak and COVID-19 pandemic scenario, patients affected by lithiasis should be prioritized into low, intermediate and high risk categories, to decide their delay and save resources, healthcare personnel, beds and ventilators. However, patients with potentially serious septic complications need emergency interventions. The possibility of performing or restarting elective activity depends on local conditions, the availability of beds and ventilators, and the implementation of screening protocols in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Delaying lithiasis surgery and increasing waiting lists will have consequences and will require considerable additional effort. Teleconsultation may be useful in guiding these patients, reducing visits and unnecessary exposure. Conclusions: categorization and prioritization of patients affected by lithiasis is crucial for management, surgical selection and follow-up. Protocols, measures and additional efforts should be carried out in the current situation of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Urology/methods , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Lithiasis/therapy , Follow-Up Studies , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Over the course of several weeks following the first diagnosed case of COVID-19 In the U.S., the virus rapidly spread across our communities. It became evident that the pandemic was going to place a severe strain on all components of the U.S. healthcare system, and we needed to adapt our daily practices, training and education. In the present paper we discuss four pillars to face a pandemic: surgical and outpatients service, tele-medicine and tele-education. In the face of unprecedented risks in providing adequate health care to our patients during this current, evolving public health crisis of COVID-19, alternative patient management tools such as telemedicine services, allow clinicians to maintain necessary patient rapport with their healthcare provider when required. As a subspecialty, urology should take full advantage of telehealth and teleeducation at this juncture. As tele-urology and tele-education can obviate the potential drawbacks of "social distancing" as it pertains to healthcare, the platform can also reduce the risk of COVID-19 spread, without compromising quality urological care and educational efforts. Telehealth can bring urologists and their patients together, perhaps closer than ever.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Urology/methods , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus , Pandemics , Urologists , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , United States , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To describe the creation and implementation of the extension program Advanced Practice Nursing in Pediatric Urology, developed in the outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in the Federal District. Method: This is an experience report regarding the implementation of an outpatient service aimed at children and adolescents with symptoms of bladder and bowel dysfunction. Results: Because it is an extension program linked to the university, it follows a different model of care, valuing empowerment, informed and shared decision making, which results in a stronger bond between patients, family and the Pediatric Urology nursing team. It has also become a privileged space for the production and use of scientific knowledge, associated with the principles of evidence-based practice. Conclusion: This project shows a different performance of the nurse-specialist-professor-researcher in Pediatric Urology Nursing, and it has become a reference in the Federal District, mainly for undergraduate and graduate nursing students.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Relatar sobre la creación e implantación del proyecto de extensión, titulado Práctica de Enfermería Avanzada en Uropediatría, desarrollado en el ambulatorio de un hospital de enseñanza del Distrito Federal. Método: Se trata de un relato de experiencia sobre la implantación de un servicio ambulatorio dirigido a niños y adolescentes portadores de síntomas de disfunción vesical e intestinal. Resultados: Por tratarse de un proyecto de extensión vinculado a la universidad, sigue un modelo diferenciado de atención que valora el empoderamiento y la toma de decisión informada y compartida, lo que fortalece el vínculo entre paciente, familia y equipo de enfermería de Uropediatría. Se ha vuelto, en consecuencia, un espacio privilegiado para la producción y aplicación de conocimientos científicos, articulado al referencial de la práctica basada en evidencias. Conclusión: Este proyecto demuestra una actuación diferenciada del enfermero-especialista-investigador-docente en el área de Enfermería en Uropediatría, y está siendo visto como referencia en el Distrito Federal, principalmente para alumnos de graduación y posgrado de Enfermería.
RESUMO Objetivo: Relatar a criação e implementação do projeto de extensão, intitulado Prática Avançada de Enfermagem em Uropediatria, desenvolvido no ambulatório de um hospital de ensino do Distrito Federal. Método: Trata-se de um relato de experiência sobre a implantação de um serviço ambulatorial direcionado a crianças e adolescentes portadores de sintomas de disfunção vesical e intestinal. Resultados: Por se tratar de um projeto de extensão vinculado à universidade, segue um modelo diferenciado de atendimento, que valoriza empoderamento e tomada de decisão informada e compartilhada, resultando no fortalecimento do vínculo entre pacientes, família e equipe de enfermagem de Uropediatria. Também se tornou um espaço privilegiado para produção e aplicação de conhecimentos científicos, articulado ao referencial da prática baseada em evidências. Conclusão: Este projeto mostra uma atuação diferenciada do enfermeiro-especialista-pesquisador-docente, na área de Enfermagem em Uropediatria, e vem se tornando referência no Distrito Federal, principalmente para alunos de graduação e pós-graduação em Enfermagem.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pediatrics/standards , Urology/methods , Urology/trends , Workplace/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/trends , Pediatrics/trends , Brazil , Workplace/psychology , Nurse's Role/psychology , Workforce , Advanced Practice Nursing/methods , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Life Change EventsABSTRACT
No abstract available.
Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Male , Erectile Dysfunction/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Urologic Diseases/therapy , Urology/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the current management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by urologists and nonurologists by use of Korean nationwide health insurance data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained patient data from the national health insurance system. New patients diagnosed with BPH in 2009 were divided into two groups depending on whether they were diagnosed by a urologist (U group) or by a nonurologist (NU group). RESULTS: A total of 390,767 individuals were newly diagnosed with BPH in 2009. Of these, 240,907 patients (61.7%) were in the U group and 149,860 patients (38.3%) were in the NU group. The rate of all initial evaluation tests, except serum creatinine, was significantly lower in the NU group. The initial prescription rate was higher in the U group, whereas the prescription period was longer in the NU group. Regarding the initial drugs prescribed, the use of alpha-blockers was common in both groups. However, the U group was prescribed combination therapy of an alpha-blocker and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor as the second choice, whereas the NU group received monotherapy with a 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor. During the 1-year follow-up, the incidence of surgery was significantly different between the U group and the NU group. CONCLUSIONS: There are distinct differences in the diagnosis and treatment of BPH by urologists and nonurologists in Korea. These differences may have adverse consequences for BPH patients. Urological societies should take a leadership role in the management of BPH and play an educational role for nonurologists as well as urologists.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Age Distribution , Databases, Factual , Disease Management , Insurance, Health , Linear Models , Physicians , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Republic of Korea , Urology/methodsSubject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Laparoscopy , Urologic Neoplasms/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urology/methods , Asia , Europe , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Patient Selection , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , South America , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States , Urologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effectsABSTRACT
A pesar de los avances tecnológicos, la historia clínica y el examen físico continúan y continuarán siendo la base de un buen enfoque y aproximación diagnóstica correcta, por ésto, la semiología sigue siendo un área muy importante en la medicina. En ésta revisión se plantea una guía sistemática e integral para la evaluación del sistema nefro-urológico en el niño desde las herramienta básicas y fundamentales como la historia clínica, el examen físico con sus componentessemiológicos en lo normal y lo patológico, integrando además los métodos diagnósticos de laboratorio e imagen disponibles en la actualidad, para lograr un buen enfoque y aproximación diagnóstica en niños con enfermedad renal.
Despite technological advances, medical history and physical examination remain the foundation of a good approach and correct diagnosis; semiology remains a very important area in medicine. In this review a systematic and comprehensive guide for the evaluation of nephron urological system in children is presented, with emphasis in medical history, physical examination and semiotic aspects, in normal and pathological conditions; additionally laboratory and imaging studies available to achieve a good diagnostic approach in children with renal disease are presented.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Physical Examination/classification , Physical Examination , Physical Examination/methods , Homeopathic Semiology , Nephrology/classification , Nephrology/education , Nephrology/methods , Urology/classification , Urology/methods , Dysuria/classification , Dysuria/complications , Dysuria/diagnosis , Dysuria/epidemiology , Dysuria/pathology , Dysuria/prevention & control , Oliguria/classification , Oliguria/complications , Oliguria/diagnosis , Oliguria/pathology , Oliguria/prevention & controlABSTRACT
Future medicine tendency is executing minimum invasive procedures in areas such as diagnostic and therapeutic. Nephrourology is not the exception. Simple and complex techniques are analyzed and described at the Interventional Unit of Imaging Center, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, with theoretic and practical basis approved by several national and international institutions.