Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sensitivity and specificity of three hearing screening protocols in the school setting
Nunes, Aryelly Dayane da Silva; Pereira, Rhadimylla Nágila; Laboratório de Processamento de SinaisPereira Junior, Antonio; Barbosa, Isabelle Ribeiro; Balen, Sheila Andreoli.
Affiliation
  • Nunes, Aryelly Dayane da Silva; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Natal. BR
  • Pereira, Rhadimylla Nágila; Prefeitura de Natal. Natal. BR
  • Laboratório de Processamento de SinaisPereira Junior, Antonio; Universidade Federal do Pará. Instituto de Tecnologia. Laboratório de Processamento de SinaisPereira Junior, Antonio. Belém. BR
  • Barbosa, Isabelle Ribeiro; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi. Santa Cruz. BR
  • Balen, Sheila Andreoli; Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Departamento de Fonoaudiologia. Natal. BR
Rev. CEFAC ; 22(6): e6519, 2020. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1136516
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of three hearing screening protocols audiometry, tympanometry, and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE).

Methods:

a cross-sectional study comprising 70 schoolchildren aged 6-14 years old (9.9 ± 2). All participants underwent a complete audiological evaluation and screening procedures. Procedures were compared regarding sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

Results:

sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 64.71% and 66.04% for audiometry, 64.71% and 73.58% for tympanometry, and 66.67% and 78.85% for TEOAE. The positive and negative predictive values were 37.93% and 14.63% for audiometry, 44% and 13.33% for tympanometry, and 52.17% and 12.77% for TEOAE.

Conclusions:

in the school setting, TEOAE stands out from the two other screening protocols, in all measures regarding sensitivity, accuracy, and predictive values.
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: Rev. CEFAC Journal subject: Terapia / PATOLOGIA DA FALA E LINGUAGEM / Terapia / Reabilita‡Æo Year: 2020 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Language: En Journal: Rev. CEFAC Journal subject: Terapia / PATOLOGIA DA FALA E LINGUAGEM / Terapia / Reabilita‡Æo Year: 2020 Type: Article