Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of closed-loop and open-loop propofol delivery systems by bispectral index monitoring in breast surgery patients: a prospective randomized trial
Xie, Tian; Wang, Yong; Liu, Yuhua; Li, Junjie; Li, Weijing; Xu, Hongmeng.
Affiliation
  • Xie, Tian; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
  • Wang, Yong; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
  • Liu, Yuhua; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
  • Li, Junjie; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
  • Li, Weijing; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
  • Xu, Hongmeng; Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University. Department of Anesthesiology. Hebei. CN
Braz. j. anesth ; 74(2): 744438, 2024. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1557245
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract

Background:

This randomized and controlled prospective study tested the hypothesis that closed-loop Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) of propofol would be associated with better system performance when compared with open-loop controlled delivery of propofol.

Methods:

Patients scheduled for elective breast surgery were randomly assigned to two groups a closed-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed by a closed-loop TCI system that used the Bispectral Index (BIS) as a feedback parameter to titrate the rate of propofol infusion, and an open-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed manually and guided by the bispectral index.

Results:

A total of 156 patients were recruited for this study (closed-loop group n = 79; open-loop group n = 77). The Global Score (GS) of the closed-loop group was lower than that of the open-loop group (34.3 and 42.2) (p = 0.044). The proportions of time with a BIS value between 40 and 60 were almost identical in the closed-loop group and the open-loop group (68.7 ± 10.6% and 66.7 ± 13.3%) (p = 0.318). The individuals in the closed-loop group consumed more propofol compared with those in the open-loop group (7.20 ± 1.65 mg.kg−1.h−1 vs. 6.03 ± 1.31 mg.kg−1.h−1, p < 0.001). No intraoperative recall, somatic events or adverse events occurred. No significant difference in heart rate was observed between the two groups (p = 0.169).

Conclusion:

The closed-loop protocol was associated with lower BIS variability and lower out-of-range BIS values, at the cost of a greater consumption of propofol when compared to the open loop group. Register numberChiCTR-INR-17010399.
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Language: En Journal: Braz. j. anesth Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Language: En Journal: Braz. j. anesth Journal subject: ANESTESIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article