Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changing negative core beliefs with trial-based thought record
Delavechia, Thaís R; Velasquez, Michella L; Duran, Érica P; Matsumoto, Lina S; Oliveira, Irismar Reis de.
  • Delavechia, Thaís R; Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Postgraduate Programs (Medicine and Health, and Interactions of Organs and Systems). Salvador. BR
  • Velasquez, Michella L; Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Postgraduate Programs (Medicine and Health, and Interactions of Organs and Systems). Salvador. BR
  • Duran, Érica P; University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Institute and Department of Psychiatry (IPq-HCFMUSP). São Paulo. BR
  • Matsumoto, Lina S; University of São Paulo School of Medicine. Institute and Department of Psychiatry (IPq-HCFMUSP). São Paulo. BR
  • Oliveira, Irismar Reis de; Federal University of Bahia (UFBA). Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Postgraduate Programs (Medicine and Health, and Interactions of Organs and Systems). Salvador. BR
Arch. Clin. Psychiatry (Impr.) ; 43(2): 31-33, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-847716
ABSTRACT

Background:

Trial-based thought record (TBTR) is a technique used in trial-based cognitive therapy (TBCT), and simulates a court trial. It was designed to restructure unhelpful core beliefs (CBs) during psychotherapy.

Objective:

To confirm previous findings on the efficacy of TBTR in decreasing patients' adherence to self-critical and unhelpful CBs and corresponding emotions, as well as assessing the differential efficacy of the empty-chair approach relative to the static format of TBTR.

Methods:

Thirty-nine outpatients were submitted to a 50-minute, one-session, application of the TBTR technique in the empty-chair (n = 18) or conventional (n = 21) formats. Patients' adherence to unhelpful CBs and the intensity of corresponding emotions were assessed after each step of TBTR, and the results obtained in each format were compared.

Results:

Significant reductions in percent values both in the credit given to CBs and in the intensity of corresponding emotions were observed at the end of the session (p < .001), relative to baseline values. ANCOVA also showed a significant difference in favor of the empty-chair format for both belief credit and emotion intensity (p = .04).

Discussion:

TBTR may help patients reduce adherence to unhelpful CBs and corresponding emotions and the empty-chair format seems to be more efficacious than the conventional format.
Subject(s)


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychotherapy / Attitude / Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Arch. Clin. Psychiatry (Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)/BR / University of São Paulo School of Medicine/BR

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Psychotherapy / Attitude / Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Arch. Clin. Psychiatry (Impr.) Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2016 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil Institution/Affiliation country: Federal University of Bahia (UFBA)/BR / University of São Paulo School of Medicine/BR