Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of cone-beam computed tomography as a predictor of osteoporosis using the Klemetti classification
Alonso, Maria Beatriz Carrazzone Cal; Vasconcelos, Taruska Ventorini; Lopes, Luciana Jácome; Watanabe, Plauto Christopher Aranha; Freitas, Deborah Queiroz.
Affiliation
  • Alonso, Maria Beatriz Carrazzone Cal; Universidade de Campinas. Department of Oral Diagnosis. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Vasconcelos, Taruska Ventorini; Universidade de Campinas. Department of Oral Diagnosis. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Lopes, Luciana Jácome; Universidade de Campinas. Department of Oral Diagnosis. Piracicaba Dental School. Piracicaba. BR
  • Watanabe, Plauto Christopher Aranha; Universidade de São Paulo. Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry. Department of Stomatology. Ribeirão Preto. BR
  • Freitas, Deborah Queiroz; Universidade de Campinas. Piracicaba Dental School. Department of Oral Diagnosis. Piracicaba. BR
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e73, 2016. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: biblio-952049
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Abstract This study aimed at evaluating the validity of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for assessing mandibular bone quality using the Klemetti classification. The morphology of the endosteal mandibular cortex of 30 (60 hemi-mandibles) postmenopausal women between the ages of 45 and 80 years was evaluated based on the Klemetti classification in panoramic radiographs used as reference images. Afterwards, panoramic reconstruction and cross-sectional slices of CBCT examinations of these patients were analyzed and categorized according to the same classification. All the images were assessed by two oral radiologists. The McNemar-Bowker test compared the agreement between the CBCT images and the reference images. No differences were found between the diagnostic results based on panoramic radiography and panoramic reconstruction. However, the mean scores for the cross-sectional evaluation were higher, and the results, statistically different from the others. Based on the disagreement found between the panoramic radiographs and the CBCT cross-sectional slices, the Klemetti classification is not an adequate means of assessing bone quality with CBCT. On the other hand, the higher values found for the cross-sectional slices could be associated with better visibility on the CBCT images.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Radiography, Panoramic / Mandibular Diseases / Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Mandible Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Radiography, Panoramic / Mandibular Diseases / Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / Cone-Beam Computed Tomography / Mandible Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Braz. oral res. (Online) Journal subject: ODONTOLOGIA Year: 2016 Type: Article