Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sirolimus en trasplante de órgano sólido pediátrico: Experiencia en 5 casos / Use of Sirolimus in five pediatric patients undergoing solid organ transplantation
Roque E., Jorge; Ríos M., Gloria; Vignolo A., Paulina; Pinochet V., Constanza; Schultz, Marcela; Humeres A., Roberto; Delucchi, Angela; Rius A., Montserrat; Hepp K., Juan.
  • Roque E., Jorge; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Ríos M., Gloria; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Vignolo A., Paulina; s.af
  • Pinochet V., Constanza; s.af
  • Schultz, Marcela; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Humeres A., Roberto; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Delucchi, Angela; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Rius A., Montserrat; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
  • Hepp K., Juan; Clínica Alemana de Santiago. Unidad de Trasplante. CL
Rev. méd. Chile ; 136(5): 631-636, mayo 2008. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-490702
ABSTRACT
Sirolimus (SRL) is an immunosuppressive drug increasingly used in children undergoing solid organ transplantation. SRL does not cause glucose intolerance, hypertension, nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity offering significant potential advantages over calceneurin inhibitors (CM).

Aim:

To report five children treated with SRL. Material and

methods:

A retrospective review of four children undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and one undergoing renal transplantation with recurrent acute rejection (RAR), chronic rejection (CR) or toxicity due to CM, treated with SRL between June 2001 and November 2006.

Results:

As primary immunosuppressive therapy, all patients received 3 drugs CM (Tacrolimus (FK) or Cyclosporine), mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Mean age at treatment with SRL was 98 months. Children undergoing OLT had a ¡ate introduction of SRL (mean time after OLT 37 months), and mean follow-up was 24 months. In this group rescue indications of SRL were RAR in one, CR in one, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in one, food allergy in one and other CM toxicity in three. Only one did not experience adverse events due to SRL, but no one required discontinuation of SRL. There were remissions of RAR, CR, TTP and food allergy. The patient with RT was switched from FK to SRL at day 18th after RT, but he had severe neutropenia that led to discontinuation of SRL.

Conclusions:

SRL may be useful in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients suffering from RAR, CR, TTP, food allergy and CM toxicity. Careful attention should be directed to detect side effects and avoid severe complications.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Liver Transplantation / Sirolimus / Graft Rejection / Immunosuppressive Agents Type of study: Observational study Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Clínica Alemana de Santiago/CL

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: LILACS (Americas) Main subject: Kidney Transplantation / Liver Transplantation / Sirolimus / Graft Rejection / Immunosuppressive Agents Type of study: Observational study Limits: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: Spanish Journal: Rev. méd. Chile Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2008 Type: Article Affiliation country: Chile Institution/Affiliation country: Clínica Alemana de Santiago/CL