Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of serological and parasitological methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis in the state of Paraná, Brazil
Szargiki, Regiane; Castro, Edilene Alcântara de; Luz, Ennio; Kowalthuk, Wolodymir; Machado, Ângela Maria; Thomaz-Soccol, Vanete.
Affiliation
  • Szargiki, Regiane; SESA. Centro de Produção e Pesquisa de Imunobiológicos. BR
  • Castro, Edilene Alcântara de; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Patologia Básica. Laboratório de Parasitologia Molecular. Curitiba. BR
  • Luz, Ennio; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Patologia Básica. Laboratório de Parasitologia Molecular. Curitiba. BR
  • Kowalthuk, Wolodymir; Prefeitura Municipal de Prudentópolis. Prudentópolis. BR
  • Machado, Ângela Maria; Prefeitura Municipal de Prudentópolis. Prudentópolis. BR
  • Thomaz-Soccol, Vanete; Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Patologia Básica. Laboratório de Parasitologia Molecular. Curitiba. BR
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 13(1): 47-52, Feb. 2009. graf, tab
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-517814
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
We evaluated the effectiveness of serological and parasitological methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) diagnosis in patients from the central region of Paraná state, southern Brazil. Five groups were compared clinical diagnosis, parasitological diagnosis, communicants, inhabitants of a non-endemic area and carriers of other etiologies. Two antigens were prepared from promastigotes of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis for indirect immunofluorescence assay, ELISA and immunoblotting. The parasitological approaches detected 79.3 percent of the patients with a clinical diagnosis; the parasites were identified by PCR as L. (V.) braziliensis. Serological methods showed 95 percent sensitivity for homologous antigens. Immunoblotting revealed specific proteins for diagnosis of CL and detected 96.6 percent of the patients when L. (V.) braziliensis was used as an antigen, and 83.3 percent with L. (L.) amazonensis. This study demonstrated the importance of differential diagnosis for leishmaniasis; the association of two or more indirect methods increased diagnosis sensitivity.
Subject(s)
Key words
Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Leishmania braziliensis / Leishmania mexicana / Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2009 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Leishmania braziliensis / Leishmania mexicana / Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Animals / Humans Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Braz. j. infect. dis Journal subject: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Year: 2009 Type: Article