Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
O parricídio simbólico: a ruptura emocional entre Freud e Jung e seus complexos de Édipo / Symbolic parricide: the emotional separation between Jung and Freud and their non-elaborated Oedipus complex
Byington, Carlos Amadeu Botelho.
Affiliation
  • Byington, Carlos Amadeu Botelho; Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia Analítica. São Paulo. BR
Junguiana ; 29(2): 16-23, nov. 2011. graf
Article in Pt | LILACS | ID: lil-610129
Responsible library: BR902.1
RESUMO
O autor descreve o que acredita serem os complexos de Édipo de Freud e de Jung mal elaborados, e considera terem sido eles os responsáveis pela ruptura emocional de sua relação. A seguir, baseando-se nas obras desses mestres, discorre sobre a problemática de Freud com a religiosidade, e a de Jung com o cristianismo. O autor enfatiza como Freud descobriu genialmente o complexo de Édipo em si mesmo, mas argumenta que ele projetou defensivamente sua sombra ao generalizar todas as crianças como perversas polimorfas, necessitando, por isso, de repressão e sublimação. O autor cita relatos de Jung feitos em Memórias, Sonhos, Reflexões, nos quais descreve sua decepção com a primeira comunhão. Finalmente, o autor cita o enaltecimento que Jung faz à missa, em seu livro de 1954, e argumenta que a discrepância entre esse estudo e as vivências descritas em Memórias pode ser atribuída a um complexo paterno negativo originário de sua educação cristã.
ABSTRACT
The author describes the mutual defensive projection of Freud’s and Jung’s non-elaborated Oedipus complex to explain their abrupt and permanent emotional separation.The author mentions how this complex of both pioneers affected their religiosity in their work. He comments on how Freud rationalized defensively his genial discovery of the Oedipus complex in himself by projecting it on all children in ( perverse polymorph) and thereby recommending their repression and sublimation to become normal.The author quotes Jung (1961), where he describes the experience of his first communion in which he “participated without understanding” as his father recommended but during which Jung himself did not feel anything.The author ends by saying that the exalted mood in which Jung refers to the Christian mass symbolism in this study, in 1954, compared to the opposite view held in Memories, without any explanation of this radical difference is the evidence of the constellation of a Christianity complex probably formed in the relationship with his father.
Subject(s)
Search on Google
Index: LILACS Main subject: Religion and Psychology / Oedipus Complex Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Pt Journal: Junguiana Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA / Teoria Junguiana Year: 2011 Type: Article / Congress and conference
Search on Google
Index: LILACS Main subject: Religion and Psychology / Oedipus Complex Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: Pt Journal: Junguiana Journal subject: PSICOLOGIA / Teoria Junguiana Year: 2011 Type: Article / Congress and conference