Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer
Sao Paulo Medical Journal; Rada, Gabriel; Capurro, Daniel; Pantoja, Tomas; Corbalán, Javiera; Moreno, Gladys; Letelier, Luz María; Vera, Claudio.
Affiliation
  • Rada, Gabriel; s.af
  • Capurro, Daniel; s.af
  • Pantoja, Tomas; s.af
  • Corbalán, Javiera; s.af
  • Moreno, Gladys; s.af
  • Letelier, Luz María; s.af
  • Vera, Claudio; s.af
São Paulo med. j ; São Paulo med. j;131(2): 141-141, abr. 2013.
Article in En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: lil-671675
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Hot flushes are common in women with a history of breast cancer. Hormonal therapies are known to reduce these symptoms but are not recommended in women with a history of breast cancer due to their potential adverse effects. The efficacy of non-hormonal therapies is still uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of non-hormonal therapies in reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer. METHODS Search

methods:

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), Medline, Embase, Lilacs, CINAHL, PsycINFO (August 2008) and WHO ICTRP Search Portal. We handsearched reference lists of reviews and included articles, reviewed conference proceedings and contacted experts. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing non-hormonal therapies with placebo or no therapy for reducing hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer. Data collection and

analysis:

Two authors independently selected potentially relevant studies, decided upon their inclusion and extracted data on participant characteristics, interventions, outcomes and the risk of bias of included studies. MAIN RESULTS Sixteen RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We included six studies on selective serotonin (SSRI) and serotonin-norepinephrine (SNRI) reuptake inhibitors, two on clonidine, one on gabapentin, two each on relaxation therapy and homeopathy, and one each on vitamin E, magnetic devices and acupuncture. The risk of bias of most studies was rated as low or moderate. Data on continuous outcomes were presented inconsistently among studies, which precluded the possibility of pooling the results. Three pharmacological treatments (SSRIs and SNRIs, clonidine and gabapentin) reduced the number and severity of hot flushes. One study assessing vitamin E did not show any beneficial effect. One ...

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: São Paulo med. j Journal subject: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / MEDICINA / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Year: 2013 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Type of study: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: São Paulo med. j Journal subject: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / MEDICINA / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Year: 2013 Type: Article