Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of ureteral length in adult cadavers
Novaes, Hugo F. F.; Leite, Paula C. S.; Almeida, Rafaela A.; Sorte, Ney C. B.; Júnior, Ubirajara Barroso.
Affiliation
  • Novaes, Hugo F. F.; Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Ciência. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Urology Department. BR
  • Leite, Paula C. S.; Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Ciência. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Urology Department. BR
  • Almeida, Rafaela A.; Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Ciência. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Urology Department. BR
  • Sorte, Ney C. B.; Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Ciência. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Urology Department. BR
  • Júnior, Ubirajara Barroso; Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Ciência. Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública. Urology Department. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 39(2): 248-256, Mar-Apr/2013. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-676251
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Introduction In some occasions, correlations between human structures can help planning surgical intra-abdominal interventions. The previous determination of ureteral length helps pre-operatory planning of surgeries, reduces costs of auxiliary exams, the correct choice of double-J catheter with low morbidity and fewer symptoms, and an adequate adhesion to treatment. Objective To evaluate ureteral length in adult cadavers and to analyze its correlation with anthropometric measures. Materials and

Methods:

From April 2009 to January 2012 we determined ureteral length of adult cadavers submitted to necropsy and obtained the following

measures:

height, distance from shoulder to wrist, elbow-wrist, xiphoid appendix-umbilicus, umbilicus-pubis, xiphoid appendix-pubis and between iliac spines. We analyzed the correlations between ureteral length and those anthropometric measures. Results We dissected 115 ureters from 115 adult corpses from April 2009 to January 2012. Median ureteral length didn't vary between sexes or according to height. It was observed no correlation among ureteral length and all considered anthropometric measures in all analyzed subgroups and in general population. There were no significant differences between right and left ureteral measures. Conclusions There is no difference of ureteral length in relation to height or gender (male or female). There is no significant correlation among ureteral length and the considered anthropometric measures. .
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Ureter Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2013 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Ureter Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2013 Type: Article