Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use of the probability of stone formation (PSF) score to assess stone forming risk and treatment response in a cohort of Brazilian stone formers
Turney, Benjamin; Robertson, William; Wiseman, Oliver; Amaro, Carmen Regina P. R.; Leitão, Victor A.; Silva, Isabela Leme da; Amaro, João Luiz.
Affiliation
  • Turney, Benjamin; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Robertson, William; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Wiseman, Oliver; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Amaro, Carmen Regina P. R.; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Leitão, Victor A.; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Silva, Isabela Leme da; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
  • Amaro, João Luiz; University of Oxford. Department of Urology. Oxford. GB
Int. braz. j. urol ; 40(4): 507-512, Jul-Aug/2014. tab, graf
Article in En | LILACS | ID: lil-723958
Responsible library: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
Introduction The aim was to confirm that PSF (probability of stone formation) changed appropriately following medical therapy on recurrent stone formers. Materials and Methods Data were collected on 26 Brazilian stone-formers. A baseline 24-hour urine collection was performed prior to treatment. Details of the medical treatment initiated for stone-disease were recorded. A PSF calculation was performed on the 24 hour urine sample using the 7 urinary parameters required voided volume, oxalate, calcium, urate, pH, citrate and magnesium. A repeat 24-hour urine sample was performed for PSF calculation after treatment. Comparison was made between the PSF scores before and during treatment. Results At baseline, 20 of the 26 patients (77%) had a high PSF score (> 0.5). Of the 26 patients, 17 (65%) showed an overall reduction in their PSF profiles with a medical treatment regimen. Eleven patients (42%) changed from a high risk (PSF > 0.5) to a low risk (PSF < 0.5) and 6 patients reduced their risk score but did not change risk category. Six (23%) patients remained in a high risk category (> 0.5) during both assessments. Conclusions The PSF score reduced following medical treatment in the majority of patients in this cohort. .
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Risk Assessment / Urolithiasis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2014 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Index: LILACS Main subject: Risk Assessment / Urolithiasis Type of study: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Int. braz. j. urol Journal subject: UROLOGIA Year: 2014 Type: Article