Clinical Evaluation of Class I Restorations Made with Composite with Low Degree of Polymerization Shrinkage.
Br J Med Med Res
;
2016; 16(9):1-7
Article
in English
| IMSEAR
| ID: sea-183366
ABSTRACT
Aims:
The objective of this study was to clinically evaluate the performance of a conventional resin system and one with low polymerization shrinkage. StudyDesign:
A prospective, randomized, blind, split-mouth study. Place and Duration of Study Dental Clinic, division of Heath Sciencies, State University of West Parana - UNIOESTE/Brazil, between October, 2011 and October, 2012.Methodology:
Teeth were restored with one of the two tested materials (n = 10) Conventional composite resin restorations (CCR) and Silorane-based resin composite restorations (SCR). The materials were used according to manufacturer’s instructions. After time intervals of 30 days, 6 months and 1 year, the restorations were assessed using the USPHS criteria. The data obtained were tabulated and evaluated by the Chi-square test for clinical parameters and for the restoration criteria (p< 0.05).Results:
No statistically significant differences between the two composite resins were found, with exception of marginal adaptation, in which CCR showed better results than SCR.Conclusion:
The silorane-based composite resin showed no advantage over the methacrylate resin.
Full text:
Available
Index:
IMSEAR (South-East Asia)
Type of study:
Controlled clinical trial
Language:
English
Journal:
Br J Med Med Res
Year:
2016
Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS