Evaluation of clinical application effect of wireless temperature and pulse measuring system / 中国实用护理杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the difference in measurement results and nursing time between wireless body temperature pulse measuring system and the traditional mercury thermometer combined with hand diagnostic method for measuring body temperature and pulse, to provide a reference for clinical selection of accurate and efficient vital sign measuring tools.Methods:A total of 74 patients hospitalized in the Orthopedics Department of the First Medical Center of the PLA General Hospital from March to August 2022 were selected using a randouized coutrolled study. The body temperature and pulse data of every patients were collected by mercury thermometer + manual diagnosis and wireless body temperature pulse measuring system at the same time, and the measurement results and nursing time of the two methods were compared.Results:The temperature and pulse measured by the wireless body temperature pulse measuring system were (36.31 ± 0.52) ℃ and (78.27 ± 14.06) times/min, which were no significant different than (36.34 ± 0.51) ℃ and (78.57 ± 13.79) times/min by the mercury thermometer + manual diagnosis ( t = -1.54, 1.88, both P>0.05), and the two groups of data were significantly correlated, ( r = 0.940 and 0.995, both P<0.01). The daily nursing work time of the wireless body temperature pulse measuring system was (67.29 ± 5.15) min, which was significantly lower than (131.57 ± 6.58) min by the mercury thermometer + manual diagnosis ( t = 20.35, P<0.01). Conclusions:The wireless body temperature pulse measurement system is accurate in data collection, easy to operate, safe to use, less time-consuming in nursing work and worthy of clinical promotion.