Comparison among Conventional 4 L Polyethylene Glycol, Split Method of 4 L Polyethylene Glycol and Combination of 2 L Polyethylene Glycol and Sodium Phosphate Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation / 대한소화기학회지
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology
; : 414-422, 2012.
Article
in Ko
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-155646
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4 L, split method of PEG 4 L and PEG 2 L plus sodium phosphate (NaP) in the aspect of bowel preparation quality, safety, patients' compliance and preference. METHODS: Total 249 subjects were prospectively enrolled and received bowel preparation for colonoscopy from August to October in 2010; PEG 4 L (93 subjects), split method of 4 L PEG (74 subjects) and PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL group (82 subjects). To investigate the completion, preference for bowel preparation and safety, a questionnaire survey was conducted before colonoscopy. RESULTS: There were no significant intergroup differences in the aspect of completion of preparation, cecal intubation time and success rate. Satisfaction and preference were higher in PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL and split method of 4 L PEG compared with PEG 4 L. In the aspect of the bowel preparation quality PEG 4 L showed significantly higher quality in the morning colonoscopy (p<0.001). However, in the afternoon colonoscopy PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL showed better result than PEG 4 L (p=0.009). Hyperphosphatemia was most frequently observed in PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL, but no severe adverse events occurred (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PEG 4 L showed better result than split method of 4 L PEG or PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL in the aspect of bowel preparation quality and safety.
Key words
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Main subject:
Phosphates
/
Polyethylene Glycols
/
Time Factors
/
Cathartics
/
Prospective Studies
/
Surveys and Questionnaires
/
Colonoscopy
/
Patient Compliance
/
Colon
/
Hyperphosphatemia
Type of study:
Observational_studies
Limits:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Language:
Ko
Journal:
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology
Year:
2012
Type:
Article