Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparision of Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy for a Nonprolapsed, Benign Uterine Disease in Women Without Vaginal Delivery / 대한산부인과학회잡지
Article in Ko | WPRIM | ID: wpr-182593
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study was designed to compare the vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy for a non-prolapsed, benign uterus in women without vaginal delivery.

METHODS:

A retrospective study in Hallym-university hospital analysed 182 total hysterectomies in women without vaginal delivery performed from January 2000 to December 2001. Vaginal route was used for 98 (53.8%) patients and 84 (46.2%) had laparotomies.

RESULTS:

The mean uterine weight was 217 g in vaginal route, 270 g in abdominal route. Mean operation time was 70 minutes in vaginal route, 125 minutes in abdominal route. There was one serious re-operation due to hemorrhge in each group and other complication was not much different at each gruops. The hospital stay was 6.2 days in vaginal route and 8.4 days in abdominal route.

CONCLUSION:

Vaginal hysterectomy for a non-prolapsed uterus is indicated for women without vaginal delivery and is feasible to performance. Vaginal hyterectomy is less morbidity, shorter hospitalization and faster convalescence. So training in vaginal surgury should allow safe performance of the procedure at most center.
Subject(s)
Key words
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Main subject: Uterine Diseases / Uterus / Convalescence / Retrospective Studies / Hospitalization / Hysterectomy / Hysterectomy, Vaginal / Laparotomy / Length of Stay Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: Ko Journal: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Year: 2004 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Main subject: Uterine Diseases / Uterus / Convalescence / Retrospective Studies / Hospitalization / Hysterectomy / Hysterectomy, Vaginal / Laparotomy / Length of Stay Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Female / Humans Language: Ko Journal: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Year: 2004 Type: Article