Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bacteriology study of hypospadias / 中华整形外科杂志
Article in Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-255105
Responsible library: WPRO
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>This clinical study was to explore why the neo-urethra is liable to be infected after hypospadias operation, find the source and the common floras of infection, and accordingly, improve the peroperation procedures so as to reduce postoperative infection rate.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The pathogenic floras were examined and analyzed by germiculture and karyotype analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The bacteria in the neo-urethra mostly came from the orifice and the reconstruction material of the urethra. The most common floras that caused infection were gram-positive coccus. The most sensitive antibiotics for hypospadias infection were demethylvancomycin.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The postoperative infection of hypospadias is incisional, not the urinary system infection. Because the microenvironment of the neo-urethra is more suitable for infection than that of the skin or mucosa, the reconstructed urethra is likely to be infected.</p>
Subject(s)
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Main subject: Postoperative Period / General Surgery / Urethra / Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Bacterial Typing Techniques / Classification / Gram-Positive Bacteria / Hypospadias / Microbiology Limits: Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery Year: 2005 Type: Article
Full text: 1 Index: WPRIM Main subject: Postoperative Period / General Surgery / Urethra / Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Bacterial Typing Techniques / Classification / Gram-Positive Bacteria / Hypospadias / Microbiology Limits: Humans / Male Language: Zh Journal: Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery Year: 2005 Type: Article