Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy: a clinical comparative study / 中华肝胆外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy.Methods The data of 165 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy were compared with 170 patients who underwent open hepatectomy in our hospital from November 2002 to December 2010.Results Laparoscopic hepatectomy was successfully carried out in 159 patients and 6 patients were converted to open operation because of intra-operative hemorrhage.The 170 patients in the open operative group had open hepatectomy successfully carried out.The hospital stay and cost in the laparoscopic group(7.6±1.3 d,31767.4±220.1(￥))were less than the open operation group(14.6±3.3 d,35127.3±392.2(￥))(t=-12.657,P＜0.001; t=-78.859,P＜0.001).There was no significant difference in Pringle's manoeuvre time,blood loss and postoperative complications(20.6 ±8.5vs.18.6±6.5 min,t=2.108,P=0.068),(420.8±76.5 vs.395.9±96.1 ml,t=2.157,P=0.063),(0 vs.4 cases,t=2.011,P=0.156))between the 2 groups.The operative time in the laparoscopic group was significantly longer than the open group(59.6 ± 12.2 vs.42.7 ± 22.6 min)(t=6.941,P＜0.001).Conclusions Laparoscopic hepatectomy is feasible and safe.It has the advantages of having less trauma and quicker recovery for tumors which were located superficially in the left liver and in the inferior part of the right liver.The operative time was longer than open hepatectomy,but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in Pringle's manoeuvre time,blood loss and postoperative complications.The hospital stay and total hospital cost in the open operation group were higher than the laparoscopic hepatectomy group.