Composing and evaluating the measurement uncertainty of two kinds of chemiluminescence detection system / 中华核医学与分子影像杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compose and evaluate the measurement uncertainty of two kinds of chemiluminescence detection system using different methods.Methods The measurement uncertainty was composed by 4 different methods:(1) U 1％ was composed of within-run CV(CVw ％),between-run CV(CVB ％)and bias (CVBias ％);(2) U2％ was composed of CVB ％ and uncertainty of calibration (CVcal ％);(3) U3％ was composed of CVW％,CVs％ and CVcal％;(4) U4％ was composed of CVW％,CVB％,CVBias％ and CVcal％.The measurement uncertainty of Architect i2000SR system (Abbott,USA) and DXI800 system (Beckman,USA) was assessed.Pearson correlation analysis,Spearman correlation analysis,Paried t test and Mann-Whitney u test were performed to analyze the data.Results For Architect i2000SR system,U1％,U2％,U3％ and U4％ were significantly correlated (r=0.727-0.988,all P＜0.05),U3％ and U2％ were significantly different (t =6.88,P＜0.05),U4％ and U1％ were significantly different (t =6.21,P＜0.05).For DXI800 system,U1％,U2％,U3％ and U4％ were also significantly correlated (r =0.608-0.975,all P＜0.05),no significant difference was found between U3％ and U2％ (z=-1.33,P＞0.05),or between U4％ and U 1％ (z =-1.04,P＞ 0.05);the expanded measurement uncertainty was correlated with CVW％,CVB％,CVBias％(rs=0.653-0.912,all P＜0.05),but not with CVcal％(rs=0.548,P＞0.05).Conclusions For Architect i2000SR system,the fourth method is more proper to compose the measurement uncertainty (U4％).For DXI800 system,the first method is more appropriate (U1％).According to the contribution of different components to the measurement uncertainty,the measurement quality could be improved by reducing the imprecision and bias.