A comparative study of ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with occlusion device and the supine and lithoto-my position mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones / 实用医学杂志
The Journal of Practical Medicine
; (24): 2140-2143, 2017.
Article
in Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-617020
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy(URL)combined with occlusion device and the supine and lithotomy position mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy(mPCNL)in the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones. No difference could be found in age,sex and size of stones between the two groups. Method From Jan. 2014 to Dec. 2016 in our hospital,all cases of upper incarcerated ureteral stones were diviede into two groups52 in ureteroscopic lithotripsy combined with occlusion device group and 45 in mini-inva-sive percutaneous nephrolithotomy group. Result The hospitalization and operation time in URL group were(5.5 ± 1.4)days and(53.3 ± 12.4)mins,which were significantly shorter than that in mPCNL group with(9.1 ± 3.2)days and(78.2 ± 14.1)mins,(P 0.05),stone clearance rate(100% vs 91.8,P > 0.05)and complication rate (4.4%vs 3.9%,P>0.05). Conclusion URL combined with occlusion device can obtain satifactory results as well as the supine and lithotomy position mPCNL in the treatment of upper incarcerated ureteral stones.
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Language:
Zh
Journal:
The Journal of Practical Medicine
Year:
2017
Type:
Article