Study on event related potentials and behavioral characteristics in Go/Nogo task in children with sleep disordered breathing and normal children / 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare and analyze the event related potential ( ERP ) and behavioral characteristics of sleep disordered breathing ( SDB ) and normal children by the persistent operating test ( CPT-AX) task,and to explore the characteristics and neural mechanism of the cognitive deficits in the left and right brain of school age SDB children. Methods SDB children( n=20) and normal children( n=20) aged 6-8 were selected. All subjects were tested by CPT-AX ( Go/Nogo task) . The ERP behavior of SDB and normal children was recorded,and the N2,P3 amplitude and latency of F3,Fz,F4 lead were compared. Re-sults ( 1) There was no significant difference between SDB group and normal group in behavioral correct number (36. 45±4. 69 vs 35. 00±3. 46),the reaction time ((516. 84±54. 14)ms vs (496. 94±78. 89)ms) and false alarm number( 1. 0 ( 0. 25,3. 75) vs 0. 5 ( 0. 00,3. 00) ) ( all P>0. 05) . ( 2) Comparison of F3,Fz and F4 lead(1) SDB groupthere was no significant difference in Go-N2 amplitude (-7. 75(-12. 03,-1. 09)μV vs (-8. 69±5. 72) μV vs ( -7. 12±4,68)μV) and Nogo-N2 amplitude((-10. 72±4. 49)μV vs (-12. 16±4. 60) μV vs (-11. 78±4. 44) μV) in the left,middle,and right of frontal regions. (2) Control groupthere was no statistical difference between F3 and Fz ((-7. 26±3. 18)μV vs (-9. 09±3. 11)μV)(P>0. 05) in N2 amplitude and there was no statistical difference between F3 and F4((-7. 26±3. 18) μV vs (-6. 10±3. 36)μV) in N2 amplitude (P>0. 05). The N2 amplitude difference of Fz and F4 ((-9. 09± 3. 11) μV vs (-6. 10±3. 36)μV ) was statistically significant (P<0. 05). The Nogo-N2 amplitude differ-ence between F3 and Fz((-14. 05±3. 31) μV vs (-15. 50±3. 52) μV) was no statistically significant (P>0. 05) . The left frontal lobe Nogo-N2 amplitude was significantly higher than that of the right frontal lobe ((-14. 05±3. 31) μV vs-11. 75(-12. 68,-10. 43) μV) (P<0. 05),and the center of the frontal lobe No-go-N2 was significantly higher than that in the right frontal lobe((-15. 50±3. 52) μV vs -11. 75(-12. 68,-10. 43) ) ,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0. 05) . ( 3) There was no significant difference in N2 latency,P3 amplitude and latency between F3,Fz and F4 leads (P>0. 05). Conclusion Compared with normal children,SDB children showed no left dominant brain region while dealing with the same conflict monitoring tasks. It is suggested that left hemisphere activation is poor and function is incompatible. Left fron-tal lobe injury in SDB is more obvious than that in the right side.