Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of the efficacy and safety of enhanced external counter pulsation in treatment of coronary heart disease in patients aged 80 years and older / 中华老年医学杂志
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics ; (12): 133-136, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-734531
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of enhanced external counter pulsation(EECP) in treatment of coronary heart disease in patients aged 80 years and older.Methods The 336 consecutive elderly patients with coronary heart disease were treated in our hospital from May 2016 to October 2017 in a prospective study.The 168 coronary heart disease patients aged 80 years and older were divide into a control group(n=84)receiving conventional therapy(anti-platelet drugs,angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,angiotensin-receptor blocker,β-blockers,calcium antagonists,nitrates,statins),and EECP group(n =84) receiving enhanced external counter pulsation 0.5 h/time,2 times per day,36 days as a course as add-on therapy to conventional therapy.And 168 patients aged 60~ 79 years received the same therapy as those in EECP group.After one course of EECP treatment,the therapeutic effects were evaluated by Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ)and Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI),and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and readmission rate were compared between groups of the EECP vs.control group and group of patients aged 60-79 years.Results The scores of SAQ and PSQI were better in the EECP group than in the control group after one course of EECP treatment,as followsphysical limitation(35.7 ±10.7 vs.26.0 ± 12.1),anginal stability (53.3 ± 22.9 vs.33.9 ± 18.9),anginal frequency (39.6 ± 6.5 vs.30.4 ± 21.1),treatment satisfaction(38.0±6.0 vs.33.7±4.7),subjective sleep quality(1.0±0.7 vs.2.5± 0.7),sleep latency(1.3±0.6 vs.2.4±0.5),sleep duration(0.9±0.6 vs.2.3±0.6),habitual sleep efficiency(1.1 ± 0.6 vs.2.5 ± 0.6),sleep disturbances (1.2 ± 0.4 vs.2.2 ± 0.6),use of sleeping medication(1.2±0.6 vs.2.2±0.6),and daytime dysfunction score was 1.3 ±0.5 vs.2.3 ±0.6 (P <0.01).The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was lower in the EECP group(31.0%,26/84)than in the control group(66.7 %,56/84)(P<0.05).At 1,3,6,12 months after EECP treatment,there was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and readmission rate between patients aged 60-79 years vs.80 years and over(P> 0.05).Conclusions EECP treatment is relatively safe and effective for coronary heart disease patients aged 80 years and older.

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Year: 2019 Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Full text: Available Index: WPRIM (Western Pacific) Type of study: Observational study Language: Chinese Journal: Chinese Journal of Geriatrics Year: 2019 Type: Article