Comparison of therapeutic effect on multi‐vessel coronary disease between minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting and coronary artery bypass grafting／ / 心血管康复医学杂志

ABSTRACT

To compare short‐and mid‐term therapeutic effect on aged patients with multi‐vessel coronary disease between minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).Methods: A total of 72 patients with multi‐vessel disease , who were suitable for MIDCAB from 2016 to 2018 , were regarded as MIDCAB group .Another 96 patients with multi‐vessel disease , who were not suitable for MIDCAB , were enrolled as CABG group (received selective on‐pump CABG).Clinical data and incidence of major adverse cardio‐ and cerebrovascular events (MACCE ) within two‐year follow‐up were compared between two groups.Results: Men percentage of MIDCAB group was significantly higher than that of CABG group (83. 3% vs. 67. 7%, P＝0.022) ; compared with CABG group , there were significant reductions in percentages of left anterior descending proximal lesions (61.5% vs.34.7%) and chronic total occlusion disease (57.3% vs.34. 7%) in MID‐CAB group ( P＜0. 01 both) , there were no significant difference in other indexes between two groups , P＞ 0. 05 all.All subjects were followed up for two years , follow‐up rate was 90. 5% .There were no significant difference in incidence rates of all‐cause death and MACCE between two groups , P＞0.05 all.Conclusion: There is no signifi‐cant difference in incidence rate of short‐and mid‐term events between CABG and MIDCAB in patients with multi‐vessel coronary disease .MIDCAB is recommended for proper patients in clinic .