Application of ultrasound medical imaging workstation in quality control of ultrasonic reports issued by resident doctors / 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the application value of ultrasound medical imaging workstation in quality control of ultrasound reports issued by resident doctors.Methods The pancreatic ultrasound reports of outpatients provided by resident doctors with 6 months and 12 months of training were derived from the ultrasound medical imaging workstation as 6-month group (G6M) and 12-month group (G12M),respectively.There were 1582 ultrasound reports in the G6M,including 420 for males and 962 for females,with 1318 for patients ＜ 65 years old and 264 for patients ≥ 65 years old.There were 2723 ultrasound reports in the G12M,including for 760 males and 1963 for females,with 2323 for patients ＜ 65 years old and 400 for patients ≥ 65 years old.Frequency of"unclear tail of the pancreas" in the report,standard image,and body markers were recorded.The chi-square test was used to compare patient gender,age,and the quality of resident reports between the two groups.Results The chi-square test showed that there was no significant difference in sex or age composition between the two groups (all P ＞ 0.05).The number of cases of"unclear tail of the pancreas" reported in the G6M and G12M was 554 (35.02％) and 734 (26.96％),respectively,and there was a statistical difference between the two groups (x2=31.029,P ＜ 0.001).In the reports with "unclear tail of the pancreas",the number of reports with "no map" was 8 (1.44％) and 14 (1.91％) in the G6M and G12M,respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P ＞ 0.05).As to "map without marker" and "map with marker",there were 337 (60.83％) vs 209 (37.73％) and 308 (41.96％) vs 412 (56.13％) in the G6M and G12M,respectively,and the chi-square test showed that there were significant differences between the two groups (x2=44.960 and 42.834,all P ＜ 0.001).Conclusion Ultrasound medical imaging workstation can be used for periodic spot check,evaluation,and feedback of resident reports,which has a positive role in promoting the quality control of ultrasound reports.