Comparison between KeyPort access and traditional transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal tumors / 中华普通外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of KeyPort access and traditional transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) in the treatment of rectal tumors.Methods:In this study, 36 cases of rectal tumors were treated by KeyPort TEM access and 52 cases by traditional TEM. Tumor type, size, distance from anal edge, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, specimen quality and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in tumor type, size, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time, complications, recurrence and metastasis rate between the two groups. The distance between lower cutting edge to the anus in KeyPort access group was significantly greater than that of traditional TEM group[(6.7±1.9) vs. (5.1±1.8) cm , t=3.901, P<0.001]. All the surgeries in the KeyPort access group were completed. While two cases of in traditional TEM group were coverted to other surgical approaches. All patients in the KeyPort group had normal anal function in the early postoperative period, while 2 patients in the traditional TEM group suffered anal function impairment. Conclusion:TEM by KeyPort access is safer and more effective then traditional TEM, as well as more generous indications.