Comparison of single-utility port and three port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To compare the surgical effect of single-utility port and three port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) for patients of thoracic esophageal cancer.Methods:Patients who underwent McKeown surgery with single-utility port and three port VATS in Department of Thoracic Surgery at Beijing Hospital from January 2013 to December 2018 were enrolled. During the thoracic procedure, patients were placed forwardly in left lateral decubitus position. The video port was made at the eighth mid-axillary intercostal space, and the single-utility port was at the fourth intercostal space between antero-axillary and mid-axillary line. For three port VATS, another incision was made at the eighth posto-axillary intercostal space. The posterior mediastinum was exposed by the "suture-drawing exposure" method, then the thoracic esophagus was carefully dissected and mediastinal lymphadenectomy was done. Information was collected including demographic, perioperative and pathological data. Patients were followed up by telephone or outpatient record.Results:A total of 62 patients of single-utility port VATS and 28 three port VATS were included. All cases were accomplished by VATS, and none of them were converted to thoracotomy or adding additional ports. Sex proportion and ages of the two groups were comparable( P>0.05). The surgery duration[(336.9±55.7) min vs.(319.7±66.3)min, P=0.205] and thoracic procedure duration[(112.5±36.7)min vs.(108.9±43.6)min, P=0.686] of two groups were also similar. There were no statistical differences in volume of drainage, postoperative stay, thoracic complications, number of lymph nodes dissected, and survival after surgery between two groups( P>0.05). Peripheral blood oxygen saturation in first 3 days after surgery of single-utility port VATS patients was significantly higher[ Day 1: (97.00±1.57)% vs.(96.10±1.23)%, P=0.009; Day 2: ( 96.60±1.84 )% vs.(95.70±1.19)%, P=0.020; Day 3: (97.40±1.56)% vs.(96.30±1.42)%, P=0.002] and respiratory rate was significantly lower[(19.70±1.48) times/min vs.(20.70±1.70) times/min, P=0.006]than three-port VATS patients. Conclusion:Single-utility port VATS for McKeown surgery is safe and feasible, which tends to reduce the surgical trauma and can be a routine surgical procedure for minimally invasive esophagectomy.