Comparison of corneal biomechanics among primary open-angle glaucoma with normal tension or hypertension and controls / 中华医学杂志(英文版)
Chin. med. j
; Chin. med. j;(24): 1087-1092, 2021.
Article
in En
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-878125
Responsible library:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND@#Normal tension glaucoma (NTG) is a less pressure-dependent type of glaucoma with characteristic optic neuropathy. Recently, the biomechanical mechanism has been thought to account for glaucomatous optic neuropathy to some degree. We intended to compare dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs) among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with normal tension or hypertension and controls. The correlations between DCRs and known risk factors for glaucoma were also analyzed.@*METHODS@#In this cross-sectional study, 49 NTG subjects, 45 hypertension glaucoma (HTG) subjects, and 50 control subjects were enrolled. We compared the differences in DCRs using corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology among the NTG, HTG, and control groups. We also analyzed the correlations between DCRs and known risk factors for glaucoma (eg, central corneal thickness [CCT], intraocular pressure [IOP], etc).@*RESULTS@#The maximum inverse concave radius (NTG: 0.18 [0.17, 0.20] mm-1; control: 0.17 [0.16, 0.18] mm-1; P = 0.033), deformation amplitude ratio of 2 mm (DAR 2 mm, NTG: 4.87 [4.33, 5.39]; control: 4.37 [4.07, 4.88]; P 0.05). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, some of the DCRs, such as IR, were negatively correlated with CCT and IOP, whereas SP-A1 was positively correlated with CCT and IOP.@*CONCLUSIONS@#The cornea was more deformable in NTG than in HTG or controls. There were no significant differences in corneal deformability between HTG and controls. The cornea was more deformable with the thinner cornea and lower IOP.
Full text:
1
Index:
WPRIM
Main subject:
Biomechanical Phenomena
/
Glaucoma, Open-Angle
/
Cross-Sectional Studies
/
Cornea
/
Low Tension Glaucoma
/
Hypertension
/
Intraocular Pressure
Type of study:
Observational_studies
/
Prevalence_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limits:
Humans
Language:
En
Journal:
Chin. med. j
Year:
2021
Type:
Article