Correction of CT radiation dose index and study on fast conversion factor / 中华放射医学与防护杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To explore the influence of different size related parameters of common CT scanned body parts on body-specific dose estimate (SSDE) , in order to establish rapid conversion factors for SSDE.Methods:A total of 189 clinical cases were collected from 6 common CT scanned body parts, including head, nasal bone, sinus, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, at Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 8 to May 10, 2021. Batch-processing of image was carried out by using Matlabcode. The axial images′area, anteroposterior (AP) dimension, lateral (LAT) dimension and average CT values were calculated. The conversion factors for estimating body-specific dose values were obtained from the real effective diameter ( De) and water equivalent diameter ( Dw) of the clinical cases, and the differences in values were compared between SSDE ED and SSDE WED. Based on the information on AP, LAT, AP + LAT, estimated De, the real De and Dw obtained in clinical practices, the SSDE rapid correction factors for adult body parts were established. The convenient conversion relation between Dw and De was obtained. Based on the correction factors for Dw, the relative errors of the correction factors for various sizes related parameters were compared. Results:The SSDE fast conversion factors for the real De of the 6 body parts were 1.01, 1.01, 1.01, 0.97, 1.28, 1.32, and those for Dw were 0.87, 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, 1.42, 1.36, respectively. The relative errors of different conversion factors ranged from 0.68% to 18.05%. The conversion factors for abdomen and pelvis had the smallest difference, and those for AP and LAT of the chest had the smallest error. The differences between CTDI vol, SSDE ED and SSDE WED in sinus, chest and abdomen were statistically significant ( tsinus=2.44, 4.23, tchest=17.67, 17.00, tabdomen and pelvis =17.93, 18.75, P<0.05) . The differences between CTDI vol and SSDE WED in head, nasal bone, were statistically significant ( t=-22.27, 2.80, P<0.05) , but not with SSDE ED ( P>0.05) . The difference between CTDI vol and SSDE ED in neck was statistically significant ( t=-3.06, P<0.05) but without statistical insignificance in camparison with SSDE WED ( P>0.05) . Conclusions:SSDE WED can be used to accurately evaluate the body-specific dose estimatates, and different size related parameters can be selected for correction in different scanned body parts. The rapid conversion factor can be easily used in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of estimated radiation dose.