Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in exhaled breath from non-hospitalized COVID-19-infected individuals.
Leding, Cæcilie; Skov, Julia; Uhrbrand, Katrine; Lisby, Jan Gorm; Hansen, Katrine Pedersbæk; Benfield, Thomas; Duncan, Louise Katrine.
  • Leding C; Department of Infectious Diseases, Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. caecilie.leding@regionh.dk.
  • Skov J; AeroCollect A/S, Brøndby, Denmark.
  • Uhrbrand K; Department of Human Diagnostics, FORCE Technology, Brøndby, Denmark.
  • Lisby JG; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Hansen KP; Department of Infectious Diseases, Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Benfield T; Department of Infectious Diseases, Center of Research and Disruption of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
  • Duncan LK; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 11151, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2028697
ABSTRACT
The diagnosis of COVID-19 is based on detection of SARS-CoV-2 in oro-/nasopharyngel swabs, but due to discomfort and minor risk during the swab procedure, detection of SARS-CoV-2 has been investigated in other biological matrixes. In this proof-of-concept study, individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection performed a daily air sample for five days. Air samples were obtained through a non-invasive electrostatic air sampler. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was determined with qRT-PCR. The association of positive samples with different exposures was evaluated through mixed-effect models. We obtained 665 air samples from 111 included participants with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, 52 individuals (46.8%) had at least one positive air sample, and 129 (19.4%) air samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Participants with symptoms or a symptom duration ≤ four days had significantly higher odds of having a positive air sample. Cycle threshold values were significantly lower in samples obtained ≤ 4 days from symptom onset. Neither variant of SARS-CoV-2 nor method of air sampling were associated with a positive air sample. We demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 is detectable in human breath by electrostatic air sampling with the highest detection rate closest to symptom onset. We suggest further evaluation of the air sampling technique to increase sensitivity.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Body Fluids / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-15243-1

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Body Fluids / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Topics: Variants Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-022-15243-1