Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Time and productivity loss associated with immunotherapy infusions for the treatment of melanoma in the United States: a survey of health care professionals and patients.
Aguiar-Ibáñez, Raquel; Scherrer, Emilie; Grebennik, Dmitri; Cook, John; Bagga, Shalini; Sawhney, Baanie; Khandelwal, Anvi; Soefje, Scott A.
  • Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Merck Canada Inc., Kirkland, QC, Canada. raquel.aguiar-ibanez@merck.com.
  • Scherrer E; Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
  • Grebennik D; Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
  • Cook J; Complete Health Economics and Outcomes Research Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Bagga S; Complete Health Economics and Outcomes Research Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Sawhney B; Complete Health Economics and Outcomes Research Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Khandelwal A; Complete Health Economics and Outcomes Research Solutions, North Wales, PA, USA.
  • Soefje SA; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 136, 2023 Feb 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238373
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A new dosing schedule for the oncology immunotherapy pembrolizumab, every 6 weeks (Q6W), has been approved by the U.S. FDA, reducing the frequency of visits to infusion centers. We quantified the time spent by oncologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers per melanoma-related immunotherapy infusion visit to evaluate its potential impact.

METHODS:

Surveys were self-completed by 100 oncologists, 101 oncology nurses, and 100 patients with melanoma across the U.S. to quantify the time spent per infusion visit with pembrolizumab (Q3W or Q6W), nivolumab (Q2W or Q4W), or nivolumab+ipilimumab (nivolumab in combination Q3W; nivolumab maintenance Q2W or Q4W). Time measures included traveling, waiting, consultation, infusion, post-treatment observation, and caregiving. Respondents were also surveyed regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infusion treatments.

RESULTS:

Responses deemed valid were provided by 89 oncologists, 93 nurses, and 100 patients. For each new [returning] patient treated with pembrolizumab, nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab, oncologists reported to spend an average of 90 [64], 87 [60] and 101 [69] minutes per infusion visit (p-value for between-group difference = 0.300 [0.627]). For first [subsequent] treatment cycles, nurses reported spending 160 [145] average minutes per visit for nivolumab+ipilimumab, versus roughly 120 [110] for the single agents (p-value for between-group difference = 0.018 [0.022]). Patients reported to spend an average of 263, 382, and 224 minutes per visit at the center for pembrolizumab (N = 47), nivolumab (n = 34), and nivolumab+ipilimumab (n = 15) respectively (p-value for between-group difference = 0.0002). Patients also reported that their unpaid (N = 20) and paid caregivers (N = 41) spent with them an average of 966 and 333 minutes, respectively, from the day before to the day after the infusion visit.

CONCLUSION:

Less frequent immunotherapy infusion visits may result in substantial time savings for oncologists, nurses, patients, and caregivers.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Melanoma Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-08904-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Melanoma Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-022-08904-4