Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Same but Different-ECMO in COVID-19 and ARDS of Other Etiologies. Comparison of Survival Outcomes and Management in Different ARDS Groups.
Golicnik, Alenka; Zivanovic, Ina; Gorjup, Vojka; Berden, Jernej.
  • Golicnik A; Department of Intensive Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Zivanovic I; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Gorjup V; Department of Intensive Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  • Berden J; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(7): 635-642, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2260870
ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 has led to increased numbers of patients in need of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, but knowledge on management in comparison to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) of other etiologies is still lacking. We analyzed venovenous ECMO management and survival outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in comparison to influenza ARDS and pulmonary ARDS of other origin.

Results:

Retrospective analysis of prospective venovenous ECMO registry-based data collection was performed. One hundred consecutive venovenous ECMO patients with severe ARDS were included (41 COVID-19, 24 influenza A, 35 ARDS of other etiologies). Patients with COVID-19 had higher BMI (body mass index), lower SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scores, lower C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels and less vasoactive support at ECMO initiation. Significantly more patients were mechanically ventilated for more than 7 days prior to ECMO initiation in the COVID-19 group, however they were ventilated with lower tidal volumes and more often received additional rescue therapies prior to and on ECMO. COVID-19 patients had significantly more barotrauma and thrombotic events on ECMO. There were no differences in weaning of ECMO, however duration of ECMO runs and ICU length of stay was significantly longer in the COVID-19 group. The leading cause of death in the COVID-19 group was irreversible respiratory failure, while uncontrolled sepsis and multiorgan failure were leading causes in the other 2 groups. All patients who survived ICU treatment were discharged out of hospital, and there were no differences in survival among groups at 180 days.

Conclusions:

Survival outcomes of venovenous ECMO patients do not differ between COVID-19 and ARDS of other pulmonary etiologies. ARDS guidelines were in greater proportion adhered to in COVID-19 patients, with, however, longer time to ECMO initiation. COVID-19 ARDS seems specific as a more single-organ disease with longer ECMO duration and irreversible respiratory failure as a main cause of ICU mortality.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Respiratory Insufficiency / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08850666231157286

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Respiratory Insufficiency / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Influenza, Human / COVID-19 Type of study: Etiology study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Intensive Care Med Journal subject: Critical Care Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08850666231157286