Why relapse occurs in PB leprosy patients after adequate MDT despite they are Mitsuda reactive: lessons form Convit's experiment on bacteria-clearing capacity of lepromin-induced granuloma.

It is amazing how after years of scientific research and therapeutic progress many simple and basic questions about protective immunity against Mycobacterium leprae remain unanswered. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended short-term multidrug therapy (WHO/MDT) for the treatment of paucibacillary (PB) leprosy patients, from time to time several workers from different parts of the globe have reported inadequate clinical responses in a few tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients following adequate WHO/MDT despite the fact that they are Mitsuda responsive. A few borderline tuberculoid patients harbor acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in their nerves for many years even though they become clinically inactive following MDT, a fact which has been ignored by many leprosy field workers. Keeping these patients in mind, we have attempted to investigate the cause of the persistence of AFB in PB cases and have looked into the question of why Mitsuda positivity in tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients, as well as in healthy contacts, is not invariably a guarantee for protectivity against the leprosy bacilli. We have: a) analyzed the histological features of lepromin-induced granulomas, b) studied the bacteria-clearing capacity of the macrophages within such granulomas, and c) studied the in vitro leukocyte migration inhibition factor released by the blood leukocytes of these subjects when M. leprae sonicates have been used as an elicitor. The results of these three tests in the three groups of subjects have been compared and led us to conclude that the bacteria-clearing capacity of the macrophages within lepromin-induced granuloma (positive CCB test) may be taken as an indicator of the capability of elimination of leprosy bacilli and protective immunity against the disease. This important macrophage function is not invariably present in all tuberculoid and indeterminate leprosy patients or in all contacts even though they are Mitsuda responsive and are able to show a positive leukocyte migration inhibition (LMI) test. It is likely but not certain that this deficit of the macrophage is genetically predetermined and persists after completion of short-term WHO/MDT. Thus, after discontinuation of treatment slow-growing, persisting M. leprae multiply within macrophages leading to relapse.

Immunotherapy of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy; a six-year follow-up study in Calcutta.

The present report, which describes management of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine, is an extension of our earlier study on the treatment of lepromatous leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy (MDT). The test Group I, consisting of 50 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients, were given low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT. The control group II consisted of 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given BCG vaccination plus MDT and 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given killed Mycobacterium leprae (human) vaccine plus MDT. The control group III consisted of 50 lepromin-positive, borderline leprosy patients not given any immunostimulation but given only MDT. Depending upon the lepromin unresponsiveness, the patients were given one to four inoculations of the various antileprosy vaccines and were followed up every 3 months for 2 years for clinical, bacteriological and immunological outcome. All patients belonging to the test and control groups showed clinical cure and bacteriological negativity within 2 years. However, immunologic potentiation, assessed by lepromin testing and the leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT), was better in the test patients receiving low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT than in the control patients receiving BCG vaccine plus MDT or killed M. leprae vaccine plus MDT or MDT alone. But the capacity of clearance bacteria (CCB) test from the lepromin granuloma showed poor bacterial clearance in the test patients. However, there was no relapse during 6 years of follow up. Two mid-borderline (BB) patients had severe reversal reactions with lagophthalmos and wrist drop during immunotherapy despite being given low-dose Convit vaccine.