Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros


Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 41(6): 662-7, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11402635

RESUMO

Thalidomide is approved in the United States for treating erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. The present study determined the single-dose oral pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality from 50 to 400 mg of Celgene's commercial Thalomid thalidomide formulation in an open-label, single-dose, three-way crossover study. Fifteen healthy subjects were given 50, 200, and 400 mg of thalidomide on three occasions, and blood samples were collected over 48 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods, and dose proportionality was assessed by linear regression of dose-normalized Cmax and AUC0-infinity. No serious or unexpected adverse events occurred. The most common adverse events were dizziness, somnolence, headache, and nausea. One patient was discontinued because of pharyngitis. There was a significant deviation from proportionality for Cmax with increases being less than proportional than changes in dose. AUC0-infinity increased proportionally with dose, suggesting that the overall amount of thalidomide absorbed, as well as its clearance, is independent of dose over the range used. V/F was found to increase with dose. This was most likely due to the terminal rate constant, which is used to calculate V/F, actually representing the absorption process rather than elimination (i.e., flip-flop phenomenon). The terminal rate constant (absorption rate constant) for the highest dose was 50% less than for the other two lower doses. The less than proportional increases in Cmax were most likely due to thalidomide's low aqueous solubility. Thalidomide shows reasonable dose proportionality with respect to AUC from 50 to 400 mg.


Assuntos
Hansenostáticos/farmacocinética , Talidomida/farmacocinética , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Peso Corporal , Feminino , Humanos , Hansenostáticos/administração & dosagem , Hansenostáticos/efeitos adversos , Hansenostáticos/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Talidomida/sangue
2.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 39(11): 1162-8, 1999 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10579147

RESUMO

Thalidomide was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. The present study determined the bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of Celgene's commercial and clinical trial thalidomide formulations and the Brazilian Tortuga formulation in an open-label, single-dose, three-way crossover design. Seventeen healthy subjects were given 200 mg of thalidomide on three occasions, and blood samples were collected over 48 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using compartmental methods for the two Celgene formulations and using noncompartmental methods for all three formulations. All subjects reported adverse events, none of which was serious or unexpected. Celgene formulations were bioequivalent when comparing Cmax, tmax, and AUC. There was significant variability in plasma levels from the Tortuga formulation, giving a mean profile that was distinctly different from the two Celgene formulations with a lower Cmax value and a longer terminal phase. The lower Cmax was probably due to slower absorption. The terminal rate constant for the Tortuga formulation was significantly less, giving rise to a terminal half-life of 15 hours compared to about 5 to 6 hours for the Celgene formulations. Confidence intervals for Cmax between the Tortuga and the Celgene formulations were outside the 80% to 125% range, indicating a lack of bioequivalence. Extent of absorption, as measured by AUC0-infinity, was approximately equal for all three formulations. Terminal half-life for Tortuga was two to three times longer compared to the Celgene formulations and is clear evidence for absorption rate limitations. The two Celgene formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic parameters with profiles that were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The authors conclude that Celgene's clinical trial and commercial thalidomide formulations are similar to each other and distinctly different from the Tortuga formulation and that all three formulations exhibited absorption rate-limited elimination.


Assuntos
Hansenostáticos/farmacocinética , Talidomida/farmacocinética , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Jejum , Humanos , Hansenostáticos/efeitos adversos , Hansenostáticos/sangue , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Talidomida/efeitos adversos , Talidomida/sangue , Equivalência Terapêutica , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 65(5): 483-90, 1999 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10340913

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of oral thalidomide (200 mg/day, administered for 21 days) and to assess the effects of steady-state plasma concentrations of thalidomide on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol (INN, ethinylestradiol) and norethindrone (INN, norethisterone). METHODS: A randomized, 2-period crossover study was performed in 10 healthy premenopausal female volunteers. The pharmacokinetic profiles of plasma concentrations of thalidomide were evaluated with both noncompartmental and compartmental methods, whereas those of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were calculated with noncompartmental methods. The effects of steady-state plasma thalidomide concentrations on the pharmacokinetics of ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were determined with use of an ANOVA model that included treatment sequence, subject within sequence, period, and treatment as factors. RESULTS: Thalidomide plasma concentrations were best predicted by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination and an absorption time-lag. There were no significant differences between pharmacokinetic parameters for thalidomide after 1 dose and those after 18 consecutive doses. Except for a minor decrease of the elimination rate constant (k(e)) for ethinyl estradiol, coadministration of thalidomide had no significant effects on the pharmacokinetic profiles for either ethinyl estradiol or norethindrone. The change in k(e) for ethinyl estradiol during thalidomide administration was not associated with any alteration in the clearance or elimination half-life for this hormone. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of thalidomide is similar to the single-dose profile. This study did not investigate the efficacy of the 21-day fixed ethinyl estradiol-norethindrone regimen, but the results suggest that thalidomide is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of orally administered hormonal contraceptives.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/farmacocinética , Anticoncepcionais Orais Sintéticos/farmacocinética , Etinilestradiol/farmacocinética , Noretindrona/farmacocinética , Talidomida/farmacologia , Talidomida/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos Cross-Over , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacocinética , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacologia , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacocinética , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Hansenostáticos/farmacocinética , Hansenostáticos/farmacologia , Valores de Referência , Talidomida/administração & dosagem , Talidomida/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA