Definition of an algorithm for the management of common skin diseases at primary health care level in sub-Saharan Africa.

In order to help primary health care (PHC) workers in developing countries in the care of common skin diseases, an algorithm for the management of pyoderma, scabies, superficial mycoses, contact dermatitis and referral of early leprosy cases (based on the identification of diseases through the presence of objective key signs, and on treatments by generic drugs) was elaborated. One thousand patients were seen by trained dermatologists, who established diagnoses and treatments; in addition, there was systematic recording of each key sign, according to the successive algorithm steps. We compared the diagnostics and treatments obtained for several combinations of diagnostic signs, with those of the dermatologists. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of defined combinations were high for pyoderma, scabies and superficial mycoses. Values were less exact for dermatitis and leprosy, but were considered sufficient for the level of health care targeted. The apportionment of treatments between the algorithm and the dermatological approaches was considered appropriate in more than 80% of cases; mismanagement was possible in 7% of cases, with few predictable harmful consequences. The algorithm was found satisfactory for the management of the dermatological priorities according to the standards required at the PHC level.

[Evaluation of the clinical classification of new cases of leprosy. Study conducted at the Marchoux Institute in Bamako, Mali]. / Evaluation de la classification clinique des nouveaux cas de lèpre. Etude réalisée á l'Institut Marchoux (Bamako, Mali).

INTRODUCTION: The difficulties related to the bacilloscopic diagnosis of leprosy, providing a more reliable classification of cases, in 1995 led the WHO to recommend the use of a new classification, in endemic countries, based on clinical criteria alone, in order to simplify the poly-chemotherapeutic regimens. According to our experience in the Marchoux Institute, this classification may lead to errors in diagnosis through overzealous or mis-interpretation of the two forms of leprosy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the concordance between this clinical classification and that based on a bacilloscopic examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of new cases of leprosy seen at the Marchoux Institute, without distinction in gender or age, from January to December 2000. All the patients included underwent clinical examination and a bacilloscopic exploration to provide a double classification. The concordance between the two classifications was assessed using the Kappa test. RESULTS: Two hundred new cases of leprosy were included. Out of 126 clinically multi-bacillary cases, 61 were confirmed bacteriologically, and 65 were false positives. Out of 74 clinical cases with few bacilli, 2 were bacteriologically multi-bacilli. The concordance between the two classifications was average (Kappa=0.40). There was a significant difference between the percentages of multi-bacilli observed in both classifications (p<10(-8)). DISCUSSION: The clinical classification may well overestimate the multi-bacillary form. In the absence of a reliable bacilloscopic apparatus, a more detailed clinical classification of leprosy forms must be developed.

Evaluation de la classification clinique des nouveaux cas de lèpre. Etude réalisée à lInstitut Marchoux (Bamako, Mali) / Evaluation of the clinical classification of new cases of leprosy. Study conducted at the Marchoux Institute in Bamako, Mali

INTRODUCTION: The difficulties related to the bacilloscopic diagnosis of leprosy, providing a more reliable classification of cases, in 1995 led the WHO to recommend the use of a new classification, in endemic countries, based on clinical criteria alone, in order to simplify the poly-chemotherapeutic regimens. According to our experience in the Marchoux Institute, this classification may lead to errors in diagnosis through overzealous or mis-interpretation of the two forms of leprosy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the concordance between this clinical classification and that based on a bacilloscopic examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of new cases of leprosy seen at the Marchoux Institute, without distinction in gender or age, from January to December 2000. All the patients included underwent clinical examination and a bacilloscopic exploration to provide a double classification. The concordance between the two classifications was assessed using the Kappa test.RESULTS: Two hundred new cases of leprosy were included. Out of 126 clinically multi-bacillary cases, 61 were confirmed bacteriologically, and 65 were false positives. Out of 74 clinical cases with few bacilli, 2 were bacteriologically multi-bacilli. The concordance between the two classifications was average (Kappa=0.40). There was a significant difference between the percentages of multi-bacilli observed in both classifications (p<10(-8)). DISCUSSION: The clinical classification may well overestimate the multi-bacillary form. In the absence of a reliable bacilloscopic apparatus, a more detailed clinical classification of leprosy forms must be developed.

[New cases of leprosy at the Marchoux Institute: a comparative study 1988-1997]. / Nouveaux cas de lèpre à l'Institut Marchoux (Bamako, Mali).

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of leprosy had declined greatly over the last decade. The purpose of this work was to determine whether changes in the epidemiology, clinical and bacteriological patterns occurred among patients with leprosy treated at the Marchoux Institute in 1988 and in 1997. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study, reviewing retrospectively all files of patients with leprosy seen in 1988 in comparison with a prospective series of leprosy patients seen in 1997. Only new cases of leprosy, prior to treatment and with skin and/or nervous lesions irrespective of the bacilloscopy results, were included in the two series. RESULTS: We included 93 patients among 246 patient files in 1988. There were 119 new cases in 1997. The following variables showed changes: mean delay to consultation (41.2 months in 1988 versus 26.1 months in 1997; patient's suspicion of having leprosy (93 patients in 1988 versus 22 in 1997); notion of contact (35 cases in 1988 versus 45 in 1997). Multibacilli leprosy predominated over paucibacilli leprosy in 1988 (51 versus 42 cases). This trend was inverted in 1997 (44 versus 75) (p<0.009). Patients with grade 2 handicap were more numerous in 1988 (20 cases versus 2 cases, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate a change in the epidemiology, clinical and bacilloscopic pattern of patients with leprosy from 1988 to 1997.