Corticosteroids for treating nerve damage in leprosy.

BACKGROUND: Leprosy causes nerve damage which can result in nerve function impairment and disability. Corticosteroids are commonly used for treating nerve damage, although the long-term effect is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of corticosteroids on nerve damage in leprosy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 4), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), CINAHL (from 1980), LILACS (from 1982) in January 2006. We checked reference lists of the studies identified, the Current Controlled Trials Register (www.controlled-trials.com), conference proceedings and contacted trial authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of corticosteroids for nerve damage in leprosy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was improvement in sensory and motor nerve function after one year. Secondary outcomes were improvement in nerve function after two years, change in nerve pain and tenderness, and adverse events. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted trial authors for additional information. We collected adverse effects and cost effectiveness information from the trials and non-randomised studies. MAIN RESULTS: We included three randomised controlled trials involving 513 people. Two trials compared prednisolone with placebo. One trial treated mild sensory impairment of less than six months duration and the other trial treated nerve function impairment of 6 to 24 months duration. Both trials examined an effect twelve months from the start of treatment. There was no significant difference in nerve function improvement between people treated with prednisolone or with placebo. The third trial compared three corticosteroid regimens for severe type 1 reactions. This trial did not report the prespecified outcomes. However, after 12 months, a significantly higher proportion of individuals on a 3-month course of prednisolone required extra corticosteroids compared to the groups with a high-dose and low-dose regimen of five months duration. Diabetes and peptic or infected ulcer were sometimes reported as serious adverse events in the placebo-controlled trials, but not significantly more often in the corticosteroid than placebo groups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids are used for treating acute nerve damage in leprosy, but evidence from randomised controlled trials does not show a significant long-term effect. Randomised controlled trials are needed to establish their effectiveness, the optimal regimens and to examine new therapies.

Multi-centre, double blind, randomized trial of three steroid regimens in the treatment of type-1 reactions in leprosy.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized trial was to compare three different steroid regimens in treating type 1 reactions in leprosy in routine clinical practice. DESIGN: The study design was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel group trial in patients with acute reversal reactions. The trial was conducted in six leprosy treatment centres in India. A total of 334 participants with acute type 1 reaction were recruited to the trial and randomized to one of three prednisolone regimens: high dose (60 mg per day) or low dose (30 mg per day) both tapered over 20 weeks, and short duration (60 mg per day tapered over 12 weeks). The main outcome measure was the proportion of patients failing to respond to treatment and requiring additional steroids. RESULTS: At the end of 12 months, 46% on the short course required additional steroids compared with 31% on the low dose and 24% on the high dose regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The two 20-week regimens were significantly better than the 12-week regimen. The high dose 20-week regimen was marginally and non-significantly better than the low dose regimen, but the high dose regimen contained 50% more steroid. Reactions in leprosy persist over many months and require long courses of steroids.

Promoting early detection in leprosy--a literature review to identify proven and potential interventions addressing patient-related delay.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the literature review was to identify proven and potential interventions to promote early diagnosis and start of treatment in leprosy, specifically, forms of intervention addressing needs at the local or primary level. DESIGN: Using a structured search procedure, we identified recent leprosy-related publications describing proven interventions. To identify potential interventions the search was extended to publications assessing knowledge and attitudes towards leprosy and extended again to identify publications relating to patient-related delay in the context of other infectious diseases. RESULTS: The review identified just 19 publications reporting leprosy-related interventions that included a form of evaluation of which only 10 directly addressed patient-related delay. These included health education interventions focussed on people directly affected by leprosy, their family members and other key individuals or groups within the local community. We identified no reports of interventions focussed specifically on the needs of women. CONCLUSIONS: Our conclusion is that the evidence base available to inform the choice of small-scale interventions to promote early detection at the primary level is extremely limited. There is an urgent need to develop and extend the range of proven interventions, specifically those that address the needs of women, those that explore and develop the health promotion potential of people previously affected by,leprosy and those that exploit the potential of individuals with leadership roles within the community. This will require careful attention to planning, implementation, evaluation and reporting of interventions.

Factors contributing to delay in diagnosis and start of treatment of leprosy: analysis of help-seeking narratives in northern Bangladesh and in West Bengal, India.

The objective of our research was to identify factors contributing to delay in diagnosis and start of treatment in leprosy, focussing on patients' narratives of help-seeking behaviour. Our research took place in Purulia, West Bengal, India and in Nilphamari, northern Bangladesh. Between January and August 2000, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 104 patients that explored each individual's narrative of help-seeking behaviour and the context of beliefs and attitudes towards leprosy. Subsequently we surveyed 356 patients currently receiving treatment for leprosy and recorded specific aspects of each help-seeking action and their reports of local beliefs and attitudes towards leprosy. Delay was estimated from time of first symptoms through to start of effective treatment (mean 18 months, median 9 months in Purulia and mean 20 months, median 12 months in Nilphamari). The number of help-seeking actions ranged from 1 to 7. Time committed to first actions contributed 86% (Nilphamari) and 79% (Purulia) to total delay. The most important contributor to delay in the first action occurred when people simply monitored or ignored first symptoms, 80% in Nilphamari and 67% in Purulia. With delay longer than 12 months as outcome, logistic regression analyses identified age over 35 years, multiple visits to practitioners in traditional medicine and multiple visits to health service practitioners as predictive of delay. Attending a nearby clinic and exposure to health education materials were predictive of early presentation reduced delay.

Nasal carriage of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in healthy individuals in Lega Robi village, Ethiopia.

The number of registered leprosy patients world-wide has decreased dramatically after extensive application of WHO recommended Multiple Drug Therapy (MDT). The annual number of new cases has, however, been almost unchanged in several populations, indicating that the infection is still present at community level. Nasal carriage of Mycobacterium leprae DNA was studied in Lega Robi village in Ethiopia. MDT had been applied for more than ten years, and 718 residents over 5 years old were eligible for the study. During the first survey nasal swab samples were collected from 664 (92.5%) individuals. The results of a Peptide Nucleic Acid-ELISA test for M. leprae DNA interpreted by stringent statistical criteria were available for 589 (88.7%) subjects. Thirty-five (5.9%) individuals without clinical signs of leprosy were positive for M. leprae DNA. Seven PCR positive individuals lived in a household where one or two other members were also positive for M. leprae DNA. During a second survey 8 (46%) of 175 interpretable PNA-ELISA tests were positive. Of 137 individuals tested twice, only two were positive on both occasions whereas 10 were PCR positive only once. The study confirms the widespread distribution of M. leprae DNA in healthy individuals. The feasibility of curbing possible transmission of subclinical infection needs further consideration.

Delay in presentation, an indicator for nerve function status at registration and for treatment outcome--the experience of the Bangladesh Acute Nerve Damage Study cohort.

The objective of our research was to relate delay in presentation in the Bangladesh Acute Nerve Damage Study cohort to intake status and to treatment outcome. The Bangladesh Acute Nerve Damage Study (BANDS) is a prospective cohort study of 2664 consecutive newly registered patients at clinics run by the Danish-Bangladesh Mission Leprosy (DBLM) project in Nilphamari, northern Bangladesh. The 1-year intake began in April 1995. Three-year follow-up for PB cases and 5 years for MB cases was completed in 2001. Delay in presentation in the BANDS cohort is associated with increased signs of nerve function impairment at registration. Individuals presenting with no nerve impairment and maintaining nerve function to the end of follow-up had the shortest mean delays. Individuals presenting with impairment that did not improve during follow-up had the longest mean delays. Discussion focuses on the value of setting a threshold value defining early presentation. Since the WHO Grade 2 disability rate effectively sanctions lengthy delays where there is no impairment, an indicator relating directly to delay is preferred as an indicator for good practice in leprosy control.

Nasal carriage of Mycobacterium leprae DNA in healthy individuals in Lega Robi village, Ethiopia

The number of registered leprosy patients world-wide has decreased dramatically after extensive application of WHO recommended Multiple Drug Therapy (MDT). The annual number of new cases has, however, been almost unchanged in several populations, indicating that the infection is still present at community level. Nasal carriage of Mycobacterium leprae DNA was studied in Lega Robi village in Ethiopia. MDT had been applied for more than ten years, and 718 residents over 5 years old were eligible for the study. During the first survey nasal swab samples were collected from 664 (92.5%) individuals. The results of a Peptide Nucleic Acid-ELISA test for M. leprae DNA interpreted by stringent statistical criteria were available for 589 (88.7%) subjects. Thirty-five (5.9%) individuals without clinical signs of leprosy were positive for M. leprae DNA. Seven PCR positive individuals lived in a household where one or two other members were also positive for M. leprae DNA. During a second survey 8 (46%) of 175 interpretable PNA-ELISA tests were positive. Of 137 individuals tested twice, only two were positive on both occasions whereas 10 were PCR positive only once. The study confirms the widespread distribution of M. leprae DNA in healthy individuals. The feasibility of curbing possible transmission of subclinical infection needs further consideration.