A novel method for simple detection of mutations conferring drug resistance in Mycobacterium leprae, based on a DNA microarray, and its applicability in developing countries.

A simple method to detect mutations in the genome of Mycobacterium leprae that confer resistance to key drugs for leprosy was exploited on the basis of a reverse hybridization system. A series of oligonucleotide probes corresponding to each mutation in the folP1, rpoB and gyrA genes for dapsone, rifampicin and ofloxacin resistance, respectively, were selected and fixed on a glass slide as capture probes, to develop a DNA microarray termed the leprosy drug susceptibility-DNA microarray (LDS-DA). Mutations in clinical isolates of M. leprae were successfully identified by the LDS-DA. Feasibility studies were conducted to evaluate the performance of the LDS-DA in two developing countries, Myanmar and the Philippines. The high concordance of the results obtained by this method with the results of nucleotide sequencing strongly supports the applicability of the LDS-DA as a drug susceptibility test in place of sequencing, a time-consuming and costly procedure. This is a rapid and simple method for the simultaneous susceptibility testing of three front-line drugs for leprosy, and solves the problems of previously reported methods.

The frequency of drug resistance mutations in Mycobacterium leprae isolates in untreated and relapsed leprosy patients from Myanmar, Indonesia and the Philippines.

INTRODUCTION: The magnitude of drug resistance in Mycobacterium leprae to dapsone, rifampicin, and ofloxacin was studied in three Southeast Asian countries with a high prevalence of leprosy. METHODS: M. leprae from the skin of leprosy patients was collected in North Maluku and North Sulawesi in Indonesia, Yangon in Myanmar, and Cebu in the Philippines. Mutations in the drug resistance determining regions in the folP1, rpoB, and gyrA genes, which have been proven to confer resistance, were analysed. In addition, samples from 51 newly diagnosed cases and 13 patients with leprosy relapse in Cebu were submitted for susceptibility testing in the mouse footpad. RESULTS: Of 252 isolates obtained from new cases, 3% were dapsone resistant and 2% were rifampicin resistant. In samples taken from patients with relapsed leprosy (n = 53), significantly more resistance mutations were detected: 15% had dapsone resistance mutations, and 8% had rifampicin resistance mutations. Two patients with relapsed leprosy had mutations for both dapsone and rifampicin resistance. No mutations conferring quinolone resistance were detected. No mutations were detected in the folP1 gene of M. leprae isolates with a low degree of resistance to dapsone. DISCUSSION: Detection of drug-resistant cases by mutation detection in the drug resistance determining region of the genome is a practical method for monitoring resistance. A comparison of the results obtained in this study with previous data obtained prior to the use of multidrug therapy (MDT), does not indicate clearly whether the magnitude of drug resistance has changed. Larger studies of resistance mutations in M. leprae isolated from patients with relapsed leprosy are needed to confirm our results. CONCLUSION: We recommend monitoring the magnitude of drug resistance globally, by testing M. leprae DNA from relapse cases and a representative sample of new cases.