The story of Lymphatic Filariasis elimination as a public health problem from Yemen.

In 2000, Yemen joined the WHO global efforts to eliminate lymphatic filariasis (LF) as a public health problem by initiating a National LF Elimination Programme (NLFEP), that was fully integrated with the National Leprosy Elimination Programme (NLEP), the Ministry of Public Health and Population. This article reviews the NLFEP extensive efforts and interventions to eliminate LF in Yemen. LF mapping was started in 2000, followed by five annual rounds of mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin and albendazole in 8 implementation units (IUs) during 2002-2006. The epidemiological coverage for all MDA rounds was ≥80%. Based on WHO guidelines of 2005, MDA was stopped in 7 IUs, additional MDA rounds were continued in one IU until 2011. Microfilaremia monitoring and evaluation, and MDA stopping surveys were conducted based on WHO guidelines of 2005 and 2011. Information about the presence of patients suffering from lymphoedema/elephantiasis and hydrocele was collected, and basic care provided to all chronic cases by NLEP coordinators, trained on LF morbidity management and disability prevention (MMDP). As of 2017, a total of 610 lymphoedema patients were trained on self-management, and 31 hydrocele patients were referred to local General Hospitals for surgery. The NLFEP made excellent progress due to integration with NLEP, strong collaboration with national and international bodies, intensive training and supervision, and the use of robust advocacy for mobilization of endemic communities. Transmission assessment surveys (TAS), conducted in 2013 and 2016, indicated 0% antigenemia levels in schoolchildren in the 8 IUs. Thus, after almost two decades of sustained effort, Yemen met the WHO criteria for successful elimination of LF as a public health problem. In 2019, WHO validated Yemen as the second country in the WHO' Eastern Mediterranean Region to successfully eliminate LF as a public health problem.

Management of severe strongyloidiasis attended at reference centers in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Strongyloides stercoralis is a globally distributed nematode that causes diverse clinical symptoms in humans. Spain, once considered an endemic country, has experienced a recent increase in imported cases. The introduction of serology helps diagnosis and is currently replacing microbiological techniques in some settings, but its sensitivity is variable and can be low in immunocompromised patients. Diagnosis can only be confirmed by identification of larvae. Often, this "gold standard" can only be achieved in severe cases, such as disseminated S.stercoralis infection, or S.stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome, where parasite load is high. In addition, these clinical presentations are not well-defined. Our aim is to describe severe cases of S.stercoralis, their epidemiological profile, and their clinical details. METHODS: An observational retrospective study of disseminated S.stercoralis infection, or hyperinfection syndrome. Inclusion criteria: aged over 18, with a diagnosis of disseminated S.stercoralis infection, or hyperinfection syndrome, confirmed by visualization of larvae. Patients were identified through revision of clinical records for the period 2000-2015, in collaboration with eight reference centers throughout Spain. RESULTS: From the period 2000-2015, eighteen cases were identified, 66.7% of which were male, with a median age of 40 (range 21-70). Most of them were foreigners (94.4%), mainly from Latin America (82.3%) or Western Africa (17.6%). Only one autochthonous case was identified, from 2006. Immunosuppressive conditions were present in fourteen (77%) patients, mainly due steroids use and to retroviral coinfections (four HIV, two HTLV). Transplant preceded the clinical presentation in four of them. Other comorbidities were coinfection with HBV, Trypanosoma cruzi, Mycobacterium leprae or Aspergillus spp. All presented with digestive disorders, with 55.6% also presenting malaise. 44.4% of cases had fever, 27.8% skin complaints, and 16.7% respiratory or neurological disorders. One patient presented anemia, and one other nephrotic syndrome. Diagnosis was confirmed by identification of larvae in fresh stool samples (n = 16; 88.9%), concentration techniques (n = 6; 33.3%), larval culture (n = 5; 29.4%), or digestive biopsies (n = 8; 44%). S.stercoralis forms were identified during necropsy in one case. In addition, ten (55%) had a positive serology. All the cases were treated with ivermectin, six (33%) also received albendazole and one case received thiabendazole followed by ivermectin. All needed inpatient management, involving a mean hospitalization stay of 25 days (range 1-164). Two cases received intensive care and eventually died. CONCLUSIONS: Only eighteen cases of disseminated S.stercoralis infection/hyperinfection syndrome were identified from the 15-year period, most of which were considered to have been imported cases. Among those, immunosuppression was frequent, and mortality due to S.stercoralis was lower than previously described.

Tratamiento de la larva migrans cutánea (erupción serpiginosa): comparación entre albendazol y el tratamiento tradicional / Treatment of larva migrans cutanea (creeping eruption): a comparison between albendazole and traditional therapy

Objetivo: La erupción serpiginosa (ES), que es característica de las regiones tropicales y subtropicales, se está observando cada vez con más frecuencia en Italia. La presencia en las playas de animales extraviados infectados por nematodos de la especie Ancylostoma favorece el contacto entre la piel humana y el suelo infestado por la larva. Materiales y métodos: Describimos nuestra experiencia con 56 pacientes (13 tratados con crioterapia, 1 con tiabendazol y crioterapia, 6 con tiabendazol, 2 con albendazol y crioterapia y 34 con albendazol). Resultados: Se consiguió una curación rápida y definitiva en los 56 pacientes. Por tanto, la eficacia terapéutica de los distintos métodos utilizados es equivalente. Conclusiones: Creemos que albendazol debería considerarse como primera línea de tratamiento. Se tolera muy bien y la aceptación de los pacientes es buena (AU)