CD2 expression and function in lepromatous leprosy.

Leprosy is a spectral disease in which clinical presentation is thought to be related to the host immune response. Previous investigations have suggested that selective unresponsiveness to Mycobacterium leprae in patients with lepromatous leprosy is due to the presence of M. leprae-specific T-suppressor cells. However, it has recently been suggested that CD2 modulation was the mechanism for the observed impaired immune response in lepromatous patients. Therefore, we studied the expression of CD2 and CD3 on lymphocytes in lepromatous skin lesions and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Using immunohistochemical techniques, we found that virtually all of the CD3+ cells in leprosy skin lesions expressed CD2. In addition, indirect immunofluorescence flow cytometry demonstrated that most CD3+ cells in the peripheral blood possessed the CD2 marker, suggesting that CD2 expression of T-lymphocytes is normal. T-cell activation using paired anti-T11(2) and anti-T11(3) or anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies demonstrated similar 3H-thymidine incorporation and gamma interferon production in the PBMC of lepromatous patients in comparison with the PBMC of their contacts and tuberculoid patients. However, lepromatous PBMC did not proliferate or produce gamma interferon in response to M. leprae. Our data suggest not only that CD2 expression is normal on T lymphocytes in lepromatous leprosy skin lesions but also that CD2 expression in peripheral blood lymphocytes is functional in T-cell activation. Defective CD2 modulation does not appear to be the mechanism for specific unresponsiveness in lepromatous leprosy.

Defective cell-mediated immunity in leprosy: failure of T cells from lepromatous leprosy patients to respond to Mycobacterium leprae is associated with defective expression of interleukin 2 receptors and is not reconstituted by interleukin 2.

Patients with lepromatous leprosy (LL) but not borderline tuberculoid leprosy (BT) have defective cell-mediated immune responses to Mycobacterium leprae, despite normal responses to other stimuli, as judged by in vivo skin testing and in vitro lymphocyte transformation. To investigate the basis of the immune defect in LL patients, we studied the ability of patient mononuclear leukocytes to produce interleukin 1 (IL 1) and interleukin 2 (IL 2) upon stimulation with M. leprae, and determined the ability of exogenous IL 1 and IL 2 to reconstitute the LL patient response to this antigen in vitro. Equal numbers of adherent non-T cells from LL and BT patients produced similar amounts of IL 1 upon challenge with M. leprae, and addition of IL 1 to the culture medium failed to reconstitute the response of lymphocytes from LL patients to M. leprae. On the other hand, T cells of LL patients failed to express receptors for IL 2 or to produce IL 2 in response to M. leprae, whereas similarly treated T cells of BT patients both expressed IL 2 receptors and produced IL 2. Finally, recombinant human IL 2 purified to homogeneity as well as crude supernatants of mitogen-activated lymphocytes failed to reconstitute the response of LL patients to M. leprae. These results suggest that T cells of LL patients fail to respond to M. leprae despite an ability to produce IL 1 and that their failure to express receptors for IL 2 may explain both defective proliferation and the failure of exogenous IL 2 to reconstitute the response.