Robotically controlled ablation for atrial fibrillation: the first real-world experience in Africa with the Hansen robotic system.

BACKGROUND: We report the first single-centre experience in Africa with the Sensei X robotic navigation system in an unselected subset of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Data were recorded prospectively of all consecutive patients who underwent robotically assisted catheter ablation therapy using the Sensei X robotic navigation system at the Christiaan Barnard Memorial Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, from July 2009 to July 2010. Outcomes were defined at one and nine months. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included: 63% had only AF and 37% had AF plus atrial flutter. AF was of the persistent type in 81% of patients. The mean procedure, fluoroscopy and ablation times were 220.6 ± 89.6 min, 31.0 ± 20.4 min, and 61.3 ± 28.1 min, respectively. Both fluoroscopy and procedure times were significantly longer for the first 19 patients compared with the remaining 76 patients (43.5 ± 22.7 vs 27.8 ± 18.5 min and 274.7 ± 90.2 vs 207.1 ± 84.7 min, respectively, p = 0.002). The procedural endpoint of the study was successfully achieved in all patients. After one attempt, 27% were discharged from hospital off anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). At a median of nine months' follow up, 74% were AF-free off AADs, and 11% were AF-free on AADs, yielding a total freedom from AF of 84% without any redo procedures. Freedom from relapse after 1.12 procedures was 88%. CONCLUSION: The Sensei X robotic navigation system offers a safe and effective approach for the treatment of AF. There was a learning curve with regard to fluoroscopy and procedure time, after which point reduction in radiation exposure and operator strain, as well as improvement in procedure throughputs were even more pronounced.

Initial experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Remote robotic navigation (RRN) technology has been developed to facilitate catheter ablation of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). Here, we assess procedural parameters of AF ablation obtained during initial use of RRN compared with a control group treated with a manual ablation approach. METHODS: Consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF were subjected to radiofrequency catheter ablation with RRN (Sensei X [Hansen Medical, Mountain View, CA]; n = 25; mean age, 60 ± 2.3 years) or using the standard manual technique (n = 61; mean age, 62 ± 1.4 years). A circumferential pulmonary vein isolation approach guided by 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping was followed. RESULTS: Remote robotic navigation was associated with reduction of overall fluoroscopy time by 26%. In a case-control subgroup analysis comparing 25 patients with similar clinical characteristics from each group, mean fluoroscopy time was reduced by 22%. Acute isolation of pulmonary veins was achieved in 97% (RRN) and 96% (conventional ablation), respectively. Ablation times and frequency of adverse events were not significantly different among study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The early use of RRN resulted in a significant reduction of overall fluoroscopy time and was equally effective and safe compared with manual catheter ablation.