CT Analysis of the Posteromedial Fragment of the Posterior Malleolar Fracture.

BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no studies describing the characteristics of posteromedial fragment in the posterior malleolus fracture. The aim was to investigate the variability of posteromedial fracture fragments to enable better surgical planning. METHODS: All Mason and Molloy type 2B fractures, defined as fracture of both the posterolateral and the posteromedial fragments of the posterior malleolus, from our database were identified to analyze the preoperative computed tomography scan. The posteromedial fragment was investigated in 47 cases (mean age, 46.6 years; 11 male, 36 female). RESULTS: Morphologically, the fracture could be divided into 2 subtypes: (1) a large pilon intra-articular fragment (mean of X axis: 33.0 mm, Y: 30.7 mm, Z: 31.7 mm) presented in 29 cases with mean interfragmentary angle of 32.1 and back of tibia angle of 32.7 degrees (this was seen in 25 of 27 cases with supination injury pattern); and (2) a small extra-articular avulsion fragment (mean of X axis: 9.6 mm, Y: 13.2 mm, Z: 11.5 mm) present in 18 cases with a mean interfragmentary angle of 11.0 and back of tibia angle of 10.1 degrees. It was seen in 80% of pronation injuries. CONCLUSION: The avulsion type of the posteromedial fragment of posterior malleolus fracture was more common in pronation injuries, likely the result of traction by the intermalleolar ligament, and the pilon type was more common in supination injuries, likely the result of the rotating talus impaction. Because of the intra-articular involvement, we believe the pilon type should undergo fixation to achieve articular congruity, unlike the avulsion type which may only function as a secondary syndesmotic stabilizer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Ankle fracture: radiographic approach according to the Lauge-Hansen classification.

Ankle fractures account for 9 % of fractures (Clare in Foot Ankle Clin 13(4):593-610, 1) representing a significant portion of the trauma workload; proximal femoral fractures are the only lower limb fracture to present more frequently. Ankle fractures have a bimodal age distribution with peaks in younger males and older females (Arimoto and Forrester in AJR Am J Roentgenol 135(5):1057-1063, 2). There has been threefold increase in the incidence among elderly females over the past three decades (Haraguchi and Armiger in J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(4):821-829, 3). In 1950, Lauge-Hansen devised a classification of ankle fractures based on the position of the foot and the deforming force at the time of injury. This has been widely accepted by orthopedists, but is not in general use by radiologists. Identification of the fractures and classification of the type of injury allows diagnosis of the otherwise occult ligamentous injuries. Three radiographic views of the ankle (anteroposterior, mortise, and lateral) are necessary to classify an injury with the Lauge-Hansen system. Two additional criteria are also necessary: the position of the foot at the time of injury and the direction of the deforming force.

Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver reliability of the hook test and the stress test for the intraoperative diagnosis of instability of the distal tibiofibular joint following fixation of ankle fractures resulting from supination-external rotation forces. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 140 patients with an unstable unilateral ankle fracture resulting from a supination-external rotation mechanism (Lauge-Hansen SE). After internal fixation of the malleolar fracture, a hook test and an external rotation stress test under fluoroscopy were performed independently by the lead surgeon and assisting surgeon, followed by a standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test of each ankle under fluoroscopy. A positive stress test result was defined as a side-to-side difference of >2 mm in the tibiotalar or the tibiofibular clear space on mortise radiographs. The sensitivity and specificity of each test were calculated with use of the standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test as a reference. RESULTS: Twenty-four (17%) of the 140 patients had a positive standardized 7.5-Nm external rotation stress test after internal fixation of the malleolar fracture. The hook test had a sensitivity of 0.25 (95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.45) and a specificity of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.0) for the detection of the same instabilities. The external rotation stress test had a sensitivity of 0.58 (95% confidence interval, 0.39 to 0.76) and a specificity of 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.98). Both tests had excellent interobserver reliability, with 99% agreement for the hook test and 98% for the stress test. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver agreement for the hook test and the clinical stress test was excellent, but the sensitivity of these tests was insufficient to adequately detect instability of the syndesmosis intraoperatively.