The human CD1-restricted T cell repertoire is limited to cross-reactive antigens: implications for host responses against immunologically related pathogens.

The repertoires of CD1- and MHC-restricted T cells are complementary, permitting the immune recognition of both lipid and peptide Ags, respectively. To compare the breadth of the CD1-restricted and MHC-restricted T cell repertoires, we evaluated T cell responses against lipid and peptide Ags of mycobacteria in leprosy, comparing tuberculoid patients, who are able to restrict the pathogen, and lepromatous patients, who have disseminated infection. The striking finding was that in lepromatous leprosy, T cells did not efficiently recognize lipid Ags from the leprosy pathogen, Mycobacterium leprae, or the related species, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, yet were able to efficiently recognize peptide Ags from M. tuberculosis, but not M. leprae. To identify a mechanism for T cell unresponsiveness against mycobacterial lipid Ags in lepromatous patients, we used T cell clones to probe the species specificity of the Ags recognized. We found that the majority of M. leprae-reactive CD1-restricted T cell clones (92%) were cross-reactive for multiple mycobacterial species, whereas the majority of M. leprae-reactive MHC-restricted T cells were species specific (66%), with a limited number of T cell clones cross-reactive (34%) with M. tuberculosis. In comparison with the MHC class II-restricted T cell repertoire, the CD1-restricted T cell repertoire is limited to recognition of cross-reactive Ags, imparting a distinct role in the host response to immunologically related pathogens.

Expression of costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, CD28, CD152), accessory molecules (TCR alphabeta, TCR gammadelta) and T cell lineage molecules (CD4+, CD8+) in PBMC of leprosy patients using Mycobacterium leprae antigen (MLCWA) with murabutide and T cell peptide of Trat protein.

In leprosy, cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is more significant than humoral response to eliminate intracellular pathogen. T cell defect is a common feature in lepromatous leprosy (LL) patients as compared to tuberculoid type (TT) patients. For efficient initiation of CD4+, T cell response requires T cell receptor (TCR) activation and costimulation provided by molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APC) and their counter receptors on T cells. In our previous study, the defective T cell function in LL patients was restored to a proliferating state with the release of TH1 type cytokines using mycobacterial antigen(s) with two immunomodulators (Murabutide (MDP-BE) and T cell epitope of Trat protein of Escherichia coli) by presenting the antigen in particulate form in vitro to PBMC derived from leprosy patients. This observation prompted us to study the expression of the costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, CD28, CD152), other accessory molecules (TCR alphabeta/gammadelta) and T cell lineage molecules (CD4+ and CD8+) during constitutive and activated state of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) derived from normal and leprosy individuals using different formulations of Mycobacterium leprae total cell wall antigen (MLCWA), Trat and MDP-BE using flow cytometric analysis. An increased surface expression of CD80, CD86 and CD28 but decreased CD152 expression was observed when PBMC of normal, BT/TT (tuberculoid) and BL/LL (lepromatous) patients were stimulated in vitro with MLCWA+MDP-BE+Trat peptide using liposomal mode of antigen delivery, while opposite results were obtained with the antigen alone. Antibody inhibition study using antihuman CD80 or CD86 completely abolished the T cell lymphoproliferation, thereby reconfirming the importance of these costimulatory molecules during T cell activation/differentiation. Though the liposome-entrapped antigen formulation has no effect on expression of alphabeta/gammadelta T cell receptor, the constitutive levels of TCR gammadelta were high in lepromatous patients. Thus, TCR bearing gammadelta appears to have a negligible regulatory role in peripheral blood of leprosy patients. The percentage of cells positive for CD4+ are increased in inducible state in all the three groups, while CD8+-positive cells were decreased in LL patients, thereby reconfirming the fact that priming of CD4+ cells are necessary for producing final effector functions. Lastly, intracellular cytokine staining experiment indicated that CD4+ cells are the major producers of IFN-gamma but not NK cells. The study highlights the reversal of T cell anergy especially in lepromatous patients through the modulation of costimulatory molecule expression under the influence of Th1 cytokines, i.e., IL-2 and IFNgamma.

Human suppressor T cell clones lack CD28.

Previously we showed that certain T cell lines and clones from a lepromatous leprosy patient displayed a dose-dependent suppression of the proliferation of autologous T cells to Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) but not mitogen or an unrelated antigen. The latter cells were also cloned and did not display this suppressive activity, were CD4+ and proliferated vigorously to M. leprae presented by autologous HLA-DR molecules. We shall refer to these cells as T helper (Th) cells. Most of the suppressive T cell clones (Ts) were also CD4+ and also proliferated to M. leprae presented by HLA-DR, but much less strongly than Th cells. In this study we report on our search for (a) the mechanism of this apparently antigen-specific suppression by T cells, and (b) a possible phenotypic difference between Th and Ts clones. The two main conclusions are that Ts clones possess a lytic machinery, but that M. leprae-specific suppression and cytotoxicity can be clearly dissociated, and that the only phenotypic difference between Th and Ts is the presence of the CD28 marker on Th and its absence on Ts clones.